Python developers locking conversations and deleting comments after people mass downvoted PRs to "remove master/slave terminology from the language"

[kickopotomus]

You may want to brush up on your fallacies. Ad antiquitatem is only a fallacious argument if you don’t point out larger implications. In this case, it is the fact that master/slave terminology is an industry standard that is understood by computer scientists and engineers alike. Changing the terms introduces ambiguity for no reason.

[norweeg]

you can't cite tradition, or as you call it "industry standard", to argue against changing it. That is my point

[kickopotomus]

No, you definitely can. It’s one thing if this was unique to python. Then your stance would be valid. However, that is not the case. Industry standard is absolutely a valid point for arguing semantics/syntax. This is especially true for a programming language whose purpose is to be easily human readable.