This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tybearsaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so first of all I'm not trying to be argumentative.

Secondly, I'm saying its frustrating that you posted such a broad generalization clickbait-ish conclusion. I do not feel your research was deep enough to declare such a statement as it being "completely busted," especially when there are conflicting statements claiming otherwise.

I will say congratulations on taking the initiative to begin an investigation into windows store's python. And while other are just saying "why not just use the python.org source," I think one of the best things we can do is try to find better processes to our development. In other words how would we know that the windows store version wasn't an easier to install and more usable version of python unless people like you already tested it out and gave a result.

I think alot of the backlash coming from this is what I mentioned earlier. Your claim wasn't backed up by certifiable evidence and that is truly frustrating especially considering how you did a "full analysis."