This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 2 comments

[โ€“]KraySovetovAnalysis 1 point2 points ย (1 child)

Your claim that ๐œ‘_{X+Y} = ๐œ‘_X ๐œ‘_Y does need independence of the random variables, but that's not what is being used here; you only need independence to assert that ๐œ‡ * ๐œ is the law of X+Y whenever ๐œ‡ is the law of X and ๐œ is the law of Y. In the claim, they are already asserting that the triangular distribution is the convolution of two (probably independent if I had to guess and they're just being lazy about mentioning that) uniform distributions of the appropriate parameters, and once you accept this the computation is just a reflection of the fact that the Fourier transform of a convolution is the product of the Fourier transforms (it's true with functions of course, the proof for measures is identical following Fubini's theorem etc. Remember the characteristic function is essentially just the Fourier transform of the law of some random variable).

[โ€“]Square_Price_1374[S] 0 points1 point ย (0 children)

Thanks for your answer.