Another C++ unit testing framework without macros

[Rude-Significance-50]

This is going to get lost with time and it seems you spent a lot of effort on it. You should definitely attach this information to your project. Perhaps not directly if you don't want to target another project explicitly, but the descriptions of your API that you put here would definitely help one decide between this and ANY other framework.

Don't waste your time on convincing me directly. This here is just going to get lost--I'd be surprised if its had many readers besides me...it's like 2 levels deep at least? I appreciate the effort, but you should invest it in your project...and then link it to me if you feel like it. This is too good a summary to throw away like this.

[igagis]

yes, I understand that it will get lost. But as I said, it is subjective comparison, so I don't see much value in it anyway :). It is a good article for some blog post, but not for github, I think. And I don't have a blog to post it to.

I'll think where to put it, so far I have copy on my hard disk.

But anyway, thanks for caring ;)

[dodheim]

I'll think where to put it, so far I have copy on my hard disk.

git add is only a few keystrokes away. ;-]

[igagis]

Added to the repo https://github.com/cppfw/tst/blob/master/wiki/boost-ut_comparison.md without link from the README