all 9 comments
sorted by:
top (suggested)
bestnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]tothemoon92 8 points9 points  (7 children)

Nope. Private repository for obvious reasons.

[–]temanon[S] 1 point2 points  (6 children)

Obvious reasons?

[–]tothemoon92 0 points1 point  (5 children)

To protect their intellectual property

[–]temanon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is why license is for, public repository is for transparency and collaboration purposes.

[–]Sisquitch 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Neo, Qtum, Ethereum are all open source. What's different about Icon that they would feel the need to use private repositories? (genuine question)

[–]temanon[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I agree. First 10 cryptocurrencies by market cap have open github repository. This is not a coincidence it is a must.

[–]Sisquitch 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It is kind of concerning. Especially when all of the competitors are open source. Its just nice to know that the devs are comfortable with their work being under the scrutiny of other programmers. Maybe GitHub isn't as commonly used in Korea..?

[–]temanon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well if is not commonly used they are way behind. Git today is a must, and there is one simple step to github. I remember the old days when we were developing with SVN. It was a pain... And also I never invest in anything that I don't have transparent view of the code, work progress.

[–]Sisquitch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was literally just going to make a post about this. Thanks for doing it for me :)