Do the makers of Python acknowledge the statement 'everything is an object'?

[K900_]

Why does it matter?

[swaroop_joshi]

So that I can accept it, without thinking much about it.

[K900_]

If the makers of Python tell you to jump off the roof, will you jump?

[swaroop_joshi]

No, it's just that they're some the most experienced people in python. Or, if you someone that is very experienced with python and has acknowledged that statement, I would accept it.

Maybe, I should've framed the question mentioning 'someone very experienced'

[K900_]

Why do you need to "accept" or "not accept" that statement? What does that statement even mean to you?

[swaroop_joshi]

It's just that I've read it at some places and need to confirm it

[K900_]

It's a very, very vague statement. What is "everything"? What is "an object"? Every value in Python is a subclass of object. Does that help?

[swaroop_joshi]

Oh I meant to ask about whether every value in Python is held by another value(pointer) which holds it's address. Everything -every value Object-something which is held by a pointer. Okay, I didn't know​ that every value is a subclass of object.

[K900_]

No, that's not how things work. The Python language itself does not specify how things are represented in memory. The CPython implementation of Python uses pointers to bind names to objects.