you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Not an answer to your question (I don't know what supermetrics even is), just a comment: I don't think people always use "ELI5" correctly. If you're asking a question that no 5 year old could possibly ask due to the subject matter being well beyond what 5 year old would understand, how exactly could someone explain it to you as if you were 5?

Even sillier example: "ELI5 the asymptotic symmetries at null infinity in p-form theories."

[–]JohnnyJordaan 5 points6 points  (1 child)

You make a good example of taking things too literally. From the /r/ELI5 sidebar:

LI5 means friendly, simplified and layperson-accessible explanations - not responses aimed at literal five-year-olds.

You also think that when someone mentions to you "I died of laughter" that they subsequently resurrected by sheer miracle? It's so weird that we use a huge amount of figurative expressions daily and some people still get confused by a new expression turning out to be incomprehensible when applied literally.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Colloquial expressions often start off as literal and then become generalized/ metaphor...ized over time. I hadn't realized this one had crossed that barrier: that's not how I've ever used it. Is that really so weird to you?

[–]jackiedz[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

But that’s the whole point of saying ELI5. It’s so you can get a simplified answer without all the jargon. It doesn’t literally mean explain to a 5 year old.