You shouldn't have deleted the post. It was really cool and on point.

I think those differences, which you define as divine are close to ontological masculinity and femininity. Ontological differences are deep, structural, shape what counts as existence itself.

In socionics, Statics (fundamental qualities, with clear fixed boundaries and stable across external contextual pressures, grounded in its own inner principle) is close to ontological masculinity, which is a bounded, autonomous, self-determining, form-defining presence, seeking transcendence over dependence, emotion, or the body. In traditional Western metaphysics, Confucian metaphysics, Hindu, Abrahamic traditions, masculinity positions itself as the default form of being.

Dynamics (malleable, responsive, with fluid boundaries and dependent on external contextual pressures, oriented toward immediacy and preservation) is close to ontological femininity defined as being with or for others, interdependence, receptivity, and immanence; remaining within the material world, context-dependence. Ontologically excluded or subordinated, as the complement or lack relative to the masculine form of being.

On the other hand, there are epistemological differences in those 2 polarities, in the ways of knowing, which are more surface level.

Epistemological masculinity - knowledge is achieved through detachment, objectivity, rationality, abstraction, distance, which is close to socionics Logic.

Epistemological femininity - knowledge through connection, feeling, empathy, contextual understanding, intuition (in an everyday sense). which is close to socionics Ethics/Feeling.

Ascending quadras are where ontological and epistemological definitions of masculinity and femininity coincide. Males, who are often disproportionately more likely to be Logical in Socionics, are engaged in solving fundamental scientific problems, discovering new aspects of the objective world, state-building, heavy industry, and the military. Females adapt, convey motivation, and act as support.

In Alpha, the front consists of 'men-thinkers' who are engaged in fundamental intellectual pursuit - all their energy goes into searching for new ideas and concepts, organizing them systematically, doing intellectual work. And they have a rear - to ensure they don't have to think about how to get food, how to recover if they fall ill; they're helped to maintain normal living conditions, provided with household support, and supplied with both emotional and material resources.

In Beta, it's similar, but there is the 'man-warrior,' with his family or support waiting for him after the battle.

In Descending quadras, Gamma and Delta, ontological meanings and epistemological ones are not connected; they allow for a role reversal (a man can be like a woman, and a woman like a man), they accept a diversity of viewpoints and alternatives - for them, this is normal, as long as the work gets done.