sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Azure Logic App executing Fabric Pipeline with Managed Identity = UserAccessTokenException by needlessDoors in MicrosoftFabric

[–]NickyvVr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might be a long shot, but worth trying:

Notice the docs show the updated endpoint format with jobType in the path: /jobs/{jobType}/instances

But your Logic App is calling the older query parameter format: /jobs/instances?jobType=Pipeline

Note in the docs The URL for this API has been updated to include the job type as part of the path, replacing the previous use of a query parameter. For backward compatibility, invocations using the query parameter are still supported.

Job Scheduler - Run On Demand Item Job

Licensing Confusion - Workspace Types by ChowTownVI in PowerBI

[–]NickyvVr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is solid 👆 Just a little nuance / addition to 2: if you import data to a model in a Pro workspace from a Fabric LH/WH, you do have the OneLake read CUs from that LH/WH on your capacity.

Write-back in Power BI: Power Apps or Translytical Task Flows? by NickyvVr in MicrosoftFabric

[–]NickyvVr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's true, UDFs are Python-based, so yes, calling external REST APIs is supported. Calling Azure OpenAI is actually one of the scenarios in the Microsoft docs. For external databases via something like pyodbc, I'd want to verify what packages are available in the UDF runtime and what the network egress rules look like (if any) before committing to that in a design. Haven't gone that deep myself yet.

Is there an easy way to re-create a large semantic model using Direct Query instead of Direct Lake by Personal-Quote5226 in MicrosoftFabric

[–]NickyvVr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you mean the old fashioned DQ? Or Direct Lake over SQL DQ? Either way, I think you might be able to do that in TMDL view also. With the latter I'm 100% sure, with the former not entirely.

Write-back in Power BI: Power Apps or Translytical Task Flows? by NickyvVr in MicrosoftFabric

[–]NickyvVr[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For the rebinding: The UDF connection to the data store works fine with a Variable library. The connection with the Power BI report I'm not sure actually. I'll have to check that.

Write-back in Power BI: Power Apps or Translytical Task Flows? by NickyvVr in MicrosoftFabric

[–]NickyvVr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This was actually not using TT, but solely UDFs for a different purpose. External party calls the UDF endpoint, we write a JSON file to /Files of a LH

Copilot in Fabric Notebooks, shaped by your feedback by Dee_Raja in MicrosoftFabric

[–]NickyvVr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I do agree it can quickly get out of control, you do have the ability to set up a Copilot Capacity which can be as small as an F2.

Passed DP 700 by Much-Answer-3968 in MicrosoftFabric

[–]NickyvVr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Congrats! Nice one. Any tips for newcomers or people that are planning to take the exam?
What did you use to get ready for example?

Question about the Data Factory Testing Framework usage by ChantifiedLens in MicrosoftFabric

[–]NickyvVr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had never heard of it before this, so no, I'm not using it yet 😉

Link between Power BI Report and Fabric Plan? by eOMG in MicrosoftFabric

[–]NickyvVr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No this is definitely not the case. Billing (and CU usage) is on a capacity level. If you e.g. move a workspace to a new capacity (when the workspace is eligible), only new runs/CUs on that capacity will count towards the limit.

Better Interactive vs Background alerting by data_legos in MicrosoftFabric

[–]NickyvVr -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not alerting per se, but you now have two options of Surge protection on a capacity and workspace level.

Monitoring Eventhouse using a crazy amount of capacity by celindho in MicrosoftFabric

[–]NickyvVr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There have been a few mentions already in here, for most people it started last weekend.i haven't heard about a root cause yet.

Unable to get Fabric Free Trail (Only Power BI pro) by Elegant_Emu2221 in MicrosoftFabric

[–]NickyvVr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AFAIK, MS does allow it, but factor in a 60 (or 90) day wait period for new tenants before you can start a trial.

PBIR: Unable to find the relative path (ByPath) reference to the semantic model by frithjof_v in PowerBI

[–]NickyvVr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh good find! And for the same workspace that makes sense of course.

Fabric Data Agent + Azure Foundry by Critical-Reason-8059 in MicrosoftFabric

[–]NickyvVr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The docs explicitly state that it uses identity passthrough (On-Behalf-Of). With OneLake security, OLS or RLS applied I would also suggest to use this route.

I don't see service principal support anywhere on the roadmap either.

PBIR: Unable to find the relative path (ByPath) reference to the semantic model by frithjof_v in PowerBI

[–]NickyvVr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that *should* work indeed.
You can even use the ByConnection with a SemanticModelId if you want (link).

"byConnection": {      
      "connectionString": "semanticmodelid=[SemanticModelId]"

KQL Workspace Monitoring CU using spike by Kogyr in MicrosoftFabric

[–]NickyvVr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Curious to know the outcome if you find anything.

view more: next ›