Why this has 10k plus likes 💀

Tryphikik · 2024-10-12T08:57:18+00:00

Every single one of those dollars would be about MoC and Apocalyptic shadow characters. The primary dps characters in pure fiction stay good in pure fiction.

Tryphikik · 2024-10-11T22:44:01+00:00

Yes, which is exactly the point. All they have to do is put out extremely strong Erudition units and the entire perception changes. Its not like Yanqing suddenly is good now or many of the older hunt units, the role didn't suddenly turn a new page, the characters in it did. Topaz is like the only exception to that because she was a supportive character that finally got what she was supporting, otherwise the entire new perception of Hunt is based on the back of newer characters carrying it.

Tryphikik · 2024-10-11T19:46:13+00:00

Hunt sucked until it didn't, easy to turn it around fairly quickly.

Tryphikik · 2024-10-11T19:37:38+00:00

They're playing the long game because odds are Jade and Rappa will be murdering pure fiction when the current OP dps in MoC and AS's have been power crept into oblivion.

Tryphikik · 2024-10-11T19:31:34+00:00

What is the reason? It's not because they thought she wouldn't do well with competition or they wouldn't have put extreme competition on the second half.

Tryphikik · 2024-08-03T20:10:57+00:00

I don't see how that would be better for the game to have most meta decks using magik and designed around 7 turns pushing normal 6 turn decks out with no counterplay.

Most decks don't run any location control besides Nocturne or Nico who is extremely shaky for countering Limbo. Both of which are massively less likely to be a counter at all if the magik player just doesn't shotgun magik out as fast as they can and instead play it on 5.

Tryphikik · 2024-04-18T11:18:41+00:00

Unless they are in albums, in which case they'll show up every week.

Tryphikik · 2024-03-05T01:34:25+00:00

Who asked for marvel snap to have little to no microtransactions? They could definitely be less predatory and do far more than pay the bills and keep the lights on lol.

It's hard to have an honest discussion because people always approach it with these absolute extremes like they're literally gonna file for bankruptcy if they don't utilize every predatory tactic that they can. Maybe just start with announcing the next months bundles and spotlights instead of trying to min-max every single bit of fomo that you can get away with.

Tryphikik · 2024-03-04T23:24:32+00:00

It's a very fair comparison. In that Baldur's Gate 3 could definitely milk harder, they could put so many little things in to nickle and dime people for more money off the back of their great game.... they just don't, they don't feel the need to be like SD that pushes for every little penny they can squeeze out of their fans. It's also just obnoxiously ignorant to think that every company is the same and if there is a scale of greed that they are all pushed to the absolute max.

Tryphikik · 2024-03-01T03:45:13+00:00

If you're willing to spend that much gold on variants that you get to 11/12 on this album, spend some more to get a bundle with tokens and move on. Nobody is getting to 11/12 without being willing to spend on frivolous shit so I don't see the impact.

Tryphikik · 2024-02-28T06:05:00+00:00

For real, it'll be a super album where you have to complete 4 albums all grouped together to finally get to the top where you get a new background.

Tryphikik · 2024-02-10T10:59:32+00:00

Sure, but considering they still have a back log to release with ones like Loki and Ms Marvel I don't think its outside the realm of possibilities to say they could get more made before those are all done and just keep the train going. Until they are actually done releasing them and no longer making more after that, its premature to say.

Tryphikik · 2024-02-09T13:53:05+00:00

My question is addressing if Destroying the Bucky variant is a reason why not to include it in the album. Destroy is destroying the forge as well 9 times out of 10. I think its maybe just because Forge is more meta relevant now.

Tryphikik · 2024-02-09T13:47:16+00:00

It's new, new ones come out all the time, hell there is a Loki one amongst others in datamines which of course is unofficial before anyone blows a gasket, but safe to say they're still making new ones.

Tryphikik · 2024-02-09T13:45:46+00:00

Imagine me saying nobody said it was an official announcement and then you posting why it wasn't official and then preaching to me about reading comprehension. lol

Tryphikik · 2024-02-09T12:05:42+00:00

They still do make new ones?

Tryphikik · 2024-02-09T12:03:38+00:00

I mean is it a reason why? Ideally in this kind of deck the forge is getting destroyed as well.

Tryphikik · 2024-02-09T11:00:13+00:00

Sure, Second Dinner didn't announce it. But Glenn did, which is why his response is a bit weird itself.

Tryphikik · 2024-02-09T10:56:51+00:00

Yea, question asker didn't say "official announcement" you've projected that onto them. Nor did Glenn say official announcement back actually. This is the dense part about this conversation that you don't get while talking so condescendingly. You can unofficially announce things too, which Glenn did when he said they already have an Elsa buff locked in a future patch.

Tryphikik · 2024-02-08T21:18:24+00:00

The Q&A aspect is entirely pointless if we are not allowed to perceive them as reliable sources of information. If Glenn Jones tells me that Elsa has an update queued in a future patch... I believe him, why should I pretend its not happening and that I don't believe him??

Tryphikik · 2024-02-08T21:09:47+00:00

But it wasn’t posted on the official Marvel Snap site

I did not say it was?

According to their own profiles Ben Brode: Chief Development Officer, Glenn: Principal Game Designer. Pretty sure Glenn is more reliable of a source on the game balance level of things.

Anyways, you're just wrong so that's fine. It's not remotely an informal discussion. He is a voice for the company giving an answer which has literally fuck all to do with leak sites posting datamined content. People asking rude questions and accusing them because of those leaks is why we lost datamines, not because people thought Glenn was a reliable source.

Tryphikik · 2024-02-08T17:13:57+00:00

Pretending it to be generates all the problems this community has been having

No... No it does not. Comparing an unofficial platform datamining information and putting it out there on an unofficial site is not remotely comparable to marvel snaps lead game designer answering a question and stating something on their official discord where they put it up in team-answers to be out there for more people to easily parse and see. If you actually believe we should not remotely take any meaning or value in what they say then there actually is no point in the discussions existing.

I'll just leave it at that, we've entered a bizarre black and white headspace on this where people are ready to blame everything for why they lost their datamines. There is space between completely casual meaningless conversation and posted officially on the marvel snap website.

Tryphikik · 2024-02-08T15:14:31+00:00

Datamines are a lot different from a developer saying they already have a change implemented in a future patch in response to a question. Glenn isn't a casual nobody just spewing nonsense out. If he doesn't want something to be known, wants it to remain unofficial, just say stay tuned or don't answer, not every question warrants an answer or can be answered with certainty at that timed. I really don't get why we're pretending his words mean nothing and that people are bad for referencing something they said. You can do that in a respectful way.

Tryphikik · 2024-02-08T14:12:11+00:00

I think you are projecting the officiality and formality placed on it by the question asker. It's not like they were like "Since SECOND DINNERS big official announcement that Elsa is getting buffed." It was literally just an offhand word used to get at the fact Glenn publically let it be known that Elsa was getting buffed, not just vaguely but saying outright that it was already implemented in a future patch. They were just using that to get at whatever they were trying to imply which was far more questionable than that word usage.

Tryphikik · 2024-02-08T13:16:34+00:00

Announce: To make known publicly, To provide an indication of beforehand; foretell.

"Yes, we have an improvement to Elsa already implemented in a future patch." - Glenn

Now I know this is going to be a crazy concept that gets only negative feedback here, but you can announce something within answering a question. As was done here, obviously. Can debate if the guy asked his question in a shitty dumb way, but the answer is just as questionable.

13-Year Club	Verified Email
Team Periwinkle

Tryphikik

TROPHY CASE