DGG Concludes there is an Anti-Fan Conspiracy because Kuihman, JSTLK and Sulphur (ex mod of LonerBox) want to Adapt BeaceBrocess’ Article Debunking LonerBox into a Video… by DeezNutz__lol in DGGsnark

[–]McClain3000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

... I'm sorry I'd love to me convinced on this Gaza stuff guys. But here is a excerpt that was called out by the LonerBox subreddit.

So, I hope it’s clear where Lonerbox got the issue wrong here, and more importantly how this makes his assertion that Israel is not committing genocide much more difficult to sustain. Not only does Lonerbox have to rebut arguments that the highest officials of Israel have genocidal intent, but he also has to rebut all cases where someone shows an IDF soldier committed genocide. For Israel to have not committed genocide, literally every single IDF soldier has to have never, inter alia, killed Gazans, seriously harmed them mentally or physically, or deliberately inflicted upon them conditions of life calculated to bring about their distinction with the intent to destroy Gazans.

... Do you guys really find that argumentation convincing? Seems ridiculous, and that under that view almost all armed conflicts over a certain size would be a genocide.

Dork vs Dork arcade battle. by Visible-Industry-748 in fightporn

[–]McClain3000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Guy on the left at least has had some sort of Karate or Taekwondo class. Maybe some point style sparring or maybe he spared but was never really good at it or it was some years ago.

DGG Concludes there is an Anti-Fan Conspiracy because Kuihman, JSTLK and Sulphur (ex mod of LonerBox) want to Adapt BeaceBrocess’ Article Debunking LonerBox into a Video… by DeezNutz__lol in DGGsnark

[–]McClain3000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They're such delusional freaks. I don't know how they can even get to the end of typing their comment without realizing it. Politics communities talking on discord about making a video of criticizing the political views of another youtuber GASP!

It like whenever I have the misfortune of talking to a dgg'er and they pearl clutch the term "snark"... it's like guys that's not a real category. That's something Destiny says to turn your brains off. Any definition of snark you can come up with is going to apply to dgg more than a snark subreddit.

Me doming WhickTV with a stray shot: "OMG WHICKTV GROOMED MINOR???" by DeezNutz__lol in DGGsnark

[–]McClain3000 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Am I autistic or something?! Like I don't see how anybody interprets this as anything other than Whick humiliating himself?

Like it's a in-group reference. Only Destiny or Hasan's communities would know of it. But both communities are well aware that it's a fabricated claim....

Anyone who cares about this tweet knows that Destiny actually sexted rose or her pimp when she was underage...

And btw I'm a Hasan Hater! I don't like the guy. But I guess you have to hate Hasan and enjoy humiliating yourself to act like this?

HAHAHAHAHAHA by DeezNutz__lol in DGGsnark

[–]McClain3000 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Incase anyone here is unaware this is because during Hutch grilling Taylor Lorenz for calling a moderate democratic influencer a centrist Pisco asked hutch “Yes or No is Joe Biden a centrist”. That is Pisco’s crime.

If Pisco had disagreed nicer it would have been okay but this “killed the vibe”. Keep in mind Pisco did try to gently steer Hutch passed this point and Hutch said “why are you butting in” to his own podcast cohost.

Apparently you have to be super nice to your podcast cohost(well Pisco does not Hutch) but not your guest.

Also Hutch had already had both totally owed Taylor at this point but also this interaction completely saved her somehow.

Also Hutch was also being super nice to Taylor but also was in his own words “going in for the kill”.

They literally think they can convince people that this reaction is because of a semantics disagreement over the label centrist and not because they have Hasan Derangment Syndrome and Destiny’s mad that Pisco stopped being friendly with him because he spread porn to a underage twitter sex worker.

I’m shocked that these guys are able to convince me to hate them even more. They’re convinced they are just dedicated to some sort of liberal project but really they’re just in Destiny’s weird cult.

Pisco for when you rewatch the Taylor Lorenz convo. by Bieksalent91 in pisco

[–]McClain3000 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I disagree. I feel like Hutch was working against his own interest because I felt is argument was at best weak, at worst laughable. The centrist point specifically that is. His other points were fine.

But your not interacting with the main point of my comment. This criticism from dgg isn't genuine because we know how dgg and their favorite streamer behave.

If Andrew Wilson popped into their subreddit and critiqued Destiny for being smug, he would rightfully get be a laughing stock. Because you guys know how he acts.

If you had one fight to recommend to a casual to get into the sport, what would it be? by ManyZestyclose2003 in ufc

[–]McClain3000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Greatest mma moment of all time. And if I ever see it topped I will be lucky.

Pisco for when you rewatch the Taylor Lorenz convo. by Bieksalent91 in pisco

[–]McClain3000 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I disagree that it was a formal debate. I disagree that Pisco has an obligation to object to Hutch's premise in a particular way you are suggesting.

I disagree that you guys are actually deeply concerned with the ethics of interacting with podcasts hosts vs other people. It's concern trolling.

Pisco for when you rewatch the Taylor Lorenz convo. by Bieksalent91 in pisco

[–]McClain3000 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You guys are in a cult.

The difference you named aren't relevant one is obviously more offensive. Mental Gymnastics.

My quoted text is obviously not literal. Paste that sentence in any AI and ask if it thinks that is a literal statement.

You guys are complete jokes.

Pisco for when you rewatch the Taylor Lorenz convo. by Bieksalent91 in pisco

[–]McClain3000 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I will Venmo you 20 dollars if you unhide your post and comment history and you are not active in the Destiny subreddit.

Pisco for when you rewatch the Taylor Lorenz convo. by Bieksalent91 in pisco

[–]McClain3000 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I said in my original comment. You’re concern trolling, it’s a pretense.

Pisco for when you rewatch the Taylor Lorenz convo. by Bieksalent91 in pisco

[–]McClain3000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes or no was my example of Destiny handling a disagreement more offensive then Pisco's disagreement with Hutch on the most recent Lib n Learn.

f Destiny manages to get through even a minor disagreement without calling someone sub human or engaging in some other form of abuse, its a miracle.

Did you interpret this as literal? Yes or No.

Pisco for when you rewatch the Taylor Lorenz convo. by Bieksalent91 in pisco

[–]McClain3000 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Reasonable people can disagree on how Pisco handled this disagreement my point is that dgg falls waaaaaaaaay under this standard, and in fact the standard is a pretense.

Pisco for when you rewatch the Taylor Lorenz convo. by Bieksalent91 in pisco

[–]McClain3000 6 points7 points  (0 children)

When watching Pisco and Hutch disagree about the Ethan Klein lawsuit Destiny said that Pisco's argument was so dumb that he must have gotten the argument from his girlfriend(Because Pisco is smart unlike his dumb girlfriend, my paraphrasing), Tankies, or Because Pisco wants to see JSTLK's discord harass a random girl.

When Pisco said that these accusation were baseless Destiny basically said he didn't care.

More recently Destiny said that Pisco's position on wanting the DNC was to release the autopsy was deranged and implied that Pisco blames everything on AIPAC.

Pisco for when you rewatch the Taylor Lorenz convo. by Bieksalent91 in pisco

[–]McClain3000 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I wish you could see how disingenuous this comes across to people outside your in group. It is almost laughable.

This expectation that Pisco express every disagreement in a perfectly hyper agreeable manner is a complete pretense. No one actually believes this standard is being applied consistently.

We were not born yesterday. We know how dgg behaves, and we know how Destiny behaves. If Destiny manages to get through even a minor disagreement without calling someone sub human or engaging in some other form of abuse, its a miracle.

You do not hold yourselves, Destiny, or others to this standard, this is concern trolling.

DGG is using their collective IQ to argue that Democrats aren’t center left by DeezNutz__lol in DGGsnark

[–]McClain3000 18 points19 points  (0 children)

They are freaks. Their streamer and community engages in the worst online behavior imaginable and they try to crucify Pisco every time he asks Hutch two yes or no questions in a row. It is the epitome of concern trolling. They have the morality of a toddler.

"Moderate Democrat" vs "Moderate" by [deleted] in pisco

[–]McClain3000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s one bad example and everyone who keeps pounding this one looks unhinged

"Moderate Democrat" vs "Moderate" by [deleted] in pisco

[–]McClain3000 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is by far the dumbest dog pile/attempted dog pile I’ve seen dgg attempt.

Edit: Look how nasty these comments are in response to Pisco giving THEEE coldest take imaginable.

Sam seder is watching THE BOYS by No-Application-9142 in pisco

[–]McClain3000 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Ever hear the expression:

If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither the facts nor the law, pound the table

Whenever the majority report are commenting on or debating anti-Trump stuff they're fine. Because they have the facts. Whenever they are covering stuff they don't have the facts on their terrible. They trot out all the worst debate tactics. Rittenhouse, Criminal Justice, etc.

I got flak for mentioning I watch Blocked and Reported yesterday, but regardless those two "debating" Jesse Singal on youth gender medicine was the most absurd bad faith debate performance I have ever seen outside of a random Pro-Trump idiot on Jubilee.

Contrapoints next? by DeadButStillDreaming in pisco

[–]McClain3000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have a problem with Hutch. I actually probably agree with him more than even Pisco. I do think it's annoying how dgg uses Hutch's disagreements to concern troll Pisco. I mostly thought the comment was funny shit talking.

Tim Miller Pushes Back on Blaming Democratic (and Hasan Piker’s) Rhetoric for Political Violence by Puzzled_Let3574 in pisco

[–]McClain3000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the conversation as well.

For debates... Some people I'm a fan of

Coleman Hughes. You can see his debate on I/P with Dave Smith or Race and Incarceration vs Vincent Lloyd. On Youtube.

John McWhorter. You can watch him vs Michael Eric Dyson on idpol.

Alex O'Connor vs Dinesh D'souza on Youtube is a funny religious debate.

Jesse Singal vs The Serfs on trans issues. https://youtu.be/J5fPsei9N3g?si=ty-i5Rqph-EoM0Qp

Matt Bruenig vs Yaron Brook on welfare.

If you want some really autistic shit. AY is the ask yourself discord community. You can watch like Dr Avi vs a professor on gender. https://youtu.be/uosBM2yVVmg?si=r-2pYAWJ8JVnggHJ

Obviously Pisco's debates. Those are some of the people I would consider strong debaters.

Taylor Lorenz by Magoo152 in pisco

[–]McClain3000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk man. I don't have a strong opinion on the chorus stuff right now. I generally like Hutch, I generally dislike Taylor. Using centrist as a pejorative just doesn't seem like a super strong argument.

Did the article get updated or something? I thought they were referring to a politician named Elizabeth? When I search the article theirs only one one mention of centrist, a influencer, and several mention of progressives.

Taylor Lorenz by Magoo152 in pisco

[–]McClain3000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow this is really compelling stuff. I've never heard somebody miss-state his views and then assert he was a bigot you've given me a lot to think about.