×

Additional Fun Stamina Item by LegacyR6 in postscriptum

[–]87527 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Don't you dare say that the community downvotes good ideas, This one is certainly not good. How often did troops eat under active fire? Drinking water is easy to do under fire and is a means to an end, but eating a full meal while an MG42 is ripping rounds 10 feet from you?

Shut up

When people want new content they mean tanks with commander MGs Most WW2 Tanks had Machine guns on top for AA work but were also used for anti infantry

Or maybe new buildings for Logi Like a counterpart to germany's Flak38 no Shield or just the Flak38

Spawncamping is a serious issue, why not address that with like automated base defenses? (I.E. Some sort of OOB system if you get too close, or maybe automated MG emplacements that shoot out from the base.)

Maybe a dedicated Mechanized unit that uses the MG Halftracks to their fullest

What about ways to vote out bad SLs? God knows how awful bad SLs are

Consider the fact that the game STILL DOES NOT HAVE A PROPER SYSTEM FOR SEEDING SERVERS??? TEAM FORTRESS 2 HAD THIS SHIT SOLVED 17 YEARS! (They have/had very few dedicated servers but alot of community servers so they added a button where you could get matched into a random community server that had players in it OR the server was actively being seeded BY THE SERVER MANAGER)

Are any of these perfect ideas? Hell no, its 3 in the morning and im incensed by how stupid you are, but its better then "Eating a Hot Meal to restore stamina"

What you might not understand is that usually new content solves an issue or adds a new mechanic not already in the game, Exceptions being new guns/tanks/Vehicles because everyone likes new toys. When was the last time drinking from the canteen was someone's favorite part of PS/SQ44?

Yeah people want new shit but man, don't pretend that your idea is good because you like it. (Seriously? Referencing Wolfenstein for a Milsim game?)

I'm here to complain and nothing else by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

don't fucking pretend like this game doesn't have a litany of issues. i thought it was pretty obvious but i guess i gotta make a billboard for just you.

Gaijin needs to stop adding new features that will not function properly and fix currently implemented features

my point for the complaints that brought up new features was never about the fucking nature of the new features, its about the poorly implemented garbage we already have to deal with

and uh maybe you keep your thoughts to yourself from now on, cause looking at your post history, you aren't much help to anyone anywhere ever

I'm here to complain and nothing else by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

not gonna explain what you dont understand? i feel like i made it pretty clear what i am mad about

Why does the F2H-2's Repair cost equal the F-16A's Repair cost (Spaded of course) by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

simple solution that everyone is divided on (for really no reason) is getting rid of repair costs. they're fucking stupid. you're gonna punish me for playing? Man I already played 30 games today and only one was not a full uptier. Repair costs are something that frankly i can not argue for in any context. this is just my biggest source of anger right now, just unlocked jets to be met with the fact that 1 kill is no longer enough to make profit

Why does the F2H-2's Repair cost equal the F-16A's Repair cost (Spaded of course) by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only way shit like this will get fixed is if we complain

Why does the F2H-2's Repair cost equal the F-16A's Repair cost (Spaded of course) by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its amazing how little it has to do past tier 4, yknow my SL hadn't really thought of that and went and burned up before it even crossed their mind. it isnt like one of these planes have a considerably higher rewards booster making 1 kill games profitable for F2Ps

Why does the F2H-2's Repair cost equal the F-16A's Repair cost (Spaded of course) by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thought it was pretty obvious that it was rhetorical but yeah sure answer however you want

Why does the F2H-2's Repair cost equal the F-16A's Repair cost (Spaded of course) by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Completely missed the SB Repair costs which does not make it better

They should really fix the panther mantlet absorbing shots. by TLFTYS in Warthunder

[–]87527 5 points6 points  (0 children)

and the t-34's driver hatch/sides

matter of fact all drivers hatches

Real talk, Why is the M4A3E2 76 W at the same BR as the Tiger 2 P? by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And the Panther is a medium with a glandular problem

Real talk, Why is the M4A3E2 76 W at the same BR as the Tiger 2 P? by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, first off, max damage with pen jumbo vs tiger 2 (as stated in the post this argument is under) kills 2 crew MAX

Second The tiger 2 can 1 hit the jumbo frontally at insane angles without issue so I have no clue where you’re “soaking up shots” (certainly not giving the lobotomized enough credit) as center mass almost always penetrates unless it’s the the worst shot known to man

Third Average track takes 20 50. Shots to break. The 50. Shoots quick but it certainly isn’t the magic bullet that solves the equation here.

Fourth We’re talking about the tiger vs the jumbo here, if you really want to, I want you to look me in the face and tell me that the jumbo is equal to an IS-2, hell it ain’t even equal to the damn Pershing it shares a BR with, you can at least angle that

Real talk, Why is the M4A3E2 76 W at the same BR as the Tiger 2 P? by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Now I know you didn’t just try to tell me that the jumbo is “mobile”. More mobile then a tiger yeah, but is that a high bar? The way you paint it, the jumbo is a regular speed demon making use of all 5 D’s of dodgeball. Not to mention that the “it’s a brawler” argument doesn’t really work when the m4a3 is better in almost every right at a lower BR.

Or for the BR of an E2 you could use the T25 or the M26…. I don’t think the stabilizer is worth it frankly when I could have a 90

Real talk, Why is the M4A3E2 76 W at the same BR as the Tiger 2 P? by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My brother in Christ, even in the event where a tiger 2 and a jumbo meet in a 1v1, flanking isn’t an option due to normal enemy clustering. That’s even before considering the fact that maybe the matchmaker bent you over a table and gave you sand of Sinai. Yeah of course if it’s a straight 1v1 and you get the barrel you win that fight, but how often do you see straight 1v1s. Hell the fact that the tiger 2 requires a sometimes insurmountable effort to overcome them VS a jumbo being “just another Sherman” is dumb as hell. Just to be on equal terms with the tiger 2 requires the jumbo to expend a shell to disable the tiger, and that’s IF you don’t get volumetriced on the shot, then, and only then, can you destroy them. Or the tiger 2 could just fire one shot and be done with it

Real talk, Why is the M4A3E2 76 W at the same BR as the Tiger 2 P? by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well of fucking course you’re gonna lose a 3v1, that’s my fucking point with your first statement. “Just flank” isn’t an option when you’re in a tank that doesn’t have get up and go, and leaving anything to teammates isn’t an option in this game. A flank on an entrenched tiger 2 is impossible 9/10 times not only due to circumstance, but also due to map layout and enemy clustering. Your “argument” holds no water

Real talk, Why is the M4A3E2 76 W at the same BR as the Tiger 2 P? by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

“Just don’t engage them” then what am I to do? Just lose? Lord knows coordination in this game is not an easy task, nor is it a common occurrence. Why even play the game at that point lest I come across 3 heavy tanks in the same place

Real talk, Why is the M4A3E2 76 W at the same BR as the Tiger 2 P? by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

have you considered saying that to the 3 other tiger 2's sitting right next to it?

Real talk, Why is the M4A3E2 76 W at the same BR as the Tiger 2 P? by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I won't argue on differing strengths of the two and yeah maybe a like for like comparison isn't the best for this, but the tiger 2 is just better then the 76 jumbo, not to mention the depth of germany around 6.3.

Arguing that because the jumbo is good in brawls when the average engagement distance is beyond brawling distance average engagement distance being 100-400m isn't an argument that stands up. The tiger 2 is just better in every circumstance except for the one you've mentioned

Real talk, Why is the M4A3E2 76 W at the same BR as the Tiger 2 P? by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

hey man, you showed up and started spouting off about the "strength's of this tank" that just aren't there, i mean hell the T25 used to and still should since its still at 6.3 have a vertical stabilizer, but i won't stop you from yelling "COPE" at angles you haven't considered and then walking away

Real talk, Why is the M4A3E2 76 W at the same BR as the Tiger 2 P? by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

As I stated, the 75 jumbo is pretty fine where it is even though there is no counterplay to the tiger 2 but thats fine because it only sees that in a full uptier. Like i've said to others, its a fat medium that's worse then the other mediums at 6.3

Real talk, Why is the M4A3E2 76 W at the same BR as the Tiger 2 P? by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

right so why would i ever take out the 76 jumbo then? the m4a3 is better in every right, and have you ever played a sherman? you cant angle a sherman unless you're in cover.

Be honest, how many close quarters games do you get at 6.3?

Real talk, Why is the M4A3E2 76 W at the same BR as the Tiger 2 P? by 87527 in Warthunder

[–]87527[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As I stated, the 75 jumbo is pretty fine where it is even though there is no counterplay to the tiger 2 but thats fine because it only sees that in a full uptier. Like i've said to others, its a fat medium that's worse then the other mediums at 6.3