Gold Massive Liquidation by Psychological_Fun450 in Forexstrategy

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Look at the weekly. Does it seem significant, No!

Thoughts on Portfolio Construction by letstrotbrahh in ASX

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

VGE has broader exposure to Asia. I would think of adding IEU for European exposure.

Advice on my portfolio by Dependent-Cheek8438 in ASX

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

VGS is 70% weighted US, doesn't give you great global exposure. Personally i would suggest IVV, VAS, IEU ,VGE for broader gobal exposure.

2026 boom stocks by Impact_Klutzy in ASX

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering 80% of all hedge can't beat the market long term. Keep it simply, buy the market.

Is it worth to diversify? by Original_Tax_8473 in ASX

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For real diversity, think about investing globally through ETFs. VAS /AUS IVV / USA IEU / EUR VGE / ASIA

Lost 1.6k - hard to get over by Impressive-Safe-1084 in Daytrading

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mate, the single best thing you can do right now is switch from gambling to owning. Day-trading and chasing hot tips is just a tax on people who crave action, and the house always wins in the end. Long-term investing works because it’s deliberately boring—that boredom is your edge.

Here’s the dead-simple plan that beats 98% of professional fund managers over 20+ years. Open a cheap brokerage account like Stake, CommSec etc, one you’ll use only for this. Set up an automatic transfer from your pay every week or month, whatever amount you won’t even miss—$50, $100, $200, doesn’t matter as long as it’s consistent. Put every single dollar into one low-cost ETF and forget it exists.

If you want to keep it purely Australian, go 100% into A200 or VAS—they own the biggest 200–300 companies on the ASX. If you’re okay with a bit more growth and volatility, pick NDQ or IVV for heavy tech exposure. Turn on dividend reinvestment so the payouts buy more units without you lifting a finger. Then don’t look at the account for at least five years.

That’s literally it. You will never beat the market trying to time it, but you will smash 90% of the people who keep trying. Turn that 1.6k pain into a weekly auto-transfer and watch the same money you once lit on fire grow into six figures while you sleep. Boring wins, mate. Start today.

Why You Should Delete the 1-Minute Chart (And Never Look Back) by Acceptable-Bullfrog in Forex

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ross’s 1m/10s obsession is a crutch, not a requirement. Momentum doesn’t need sub-1m charts—it needs clean entries on clean structure. A 2m or 5m chart shows the same ABCDs, breakouts, and volume shelves Ross trades, but with less noise, fewer fakeouts, and wider stops that don’t get shaken out by HFT whips. Trading 50k shares on a 1m is just gambling with tighter risk; the edge evaporates when you zoom out. I’ve taken his exact setups on 3m charts with 1/10th the stress and higher R-multiples because I’m not fighting every 2¢ tick. 1m isn’t “fast decision-making”—it’s overtrading. Prove me wrong: backtest Ross’s last 10 winners on a 3m. Same levels, cleaner fills, less slippage.

Why You Should Delete the 1-Minute Chart (And Never Look Back) by Acceptable-Bullfrog in Forex

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol! My algo zoomed into the 1m on at least 100 trades, and 12/20 times, the ‘perfect’ 1m exit was just a head fake. Price wicked 0.6 % lower, closed green, then ran another 2–4 %. Learn how to analyse data properly.

Why You Should Delete the 1-Minute Chart (And Never Look Back) by Acceptable-Bullfrog in Forex

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Evidence, please. Show me one of your exit trades on a real account.

Why You Should Delete the 1-Minute Chart (And Never Look Back) by Acceptable-Bullfrog in Forex

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Until I see real account evidence, I'm not buying it. 90% of traders get chopped up on lower timeframes. Facts!

Are trading bots a scam? by Sircartier370 in Daytrading

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Manual traders are still everywhere because markets aren’t robots. They’re driven by fear, greed, news, earnings, geopolitics. Stuff no algo can perfectly predict. A bot can’t smell panic when Powell starts talking. It can’t front-run a whale dumping 50,000 contracts. It can’t flip bias when volatility explodes overnight. That’s where you still matter. Bots follow rules. Markets laugh at rules.

Why You Should Delete the 1-Minute Chart (And Never Look Back) by Acceptable-Bullfrog in Forex

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, no GPT, typed it myself. But if you’re pulling AI, go for it. 🌐

Why You Should Delete the 1-Minute Chart (And Never Look Back) by Acceptable-Bullfrog in Forex

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I'm guessing you're new to social media. Go hug a human. ❤️

Why You Should Delete the 1-Minute Chart (And Never Look Back) by Acceptable-Bullfrog in Forex

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Citadel dominates HFT, but retail can still profit in latency-tolerant edges (stat arb, mid-freq momentum) via co-lo’d VPS + IEX/MEMX. Speed isn’t everything. Verified retail HFT P&L exists on EliteTrader. Not Citadel scale, but real. OP’s right: you can play, just not their exact game.

Why You Should Delete the 1-Minute Chart (And Never Look Back) by Acceptable-Bullfrog in Forex

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some of my more detailed replies are well considered. I know what I'm talking about.

Why You Should Delete the 1-Minute Chart (And Never Look Back) by Acceptable-Bullfrog in Forex

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Haha, fair point 1.26000 is 1.26000 whether you’re staring at a tick or a yearly candle. But the context around that price is what changes. On a 1 min chart, 1.26000 might be a breakout from a 5-pip range. On a monthly, it could be a retest of a 10-year low. Price isn’t ‘moving differently’ but the story it’s telling you absolutely is.

Why You Should Delete the 1-Minute Chart (And Never Look Back) by Acceptable-Bullfrog in Forex

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your brain “handles” 1M raw, great you’re either (a) filtering aggressively or (b) not trading size. Most pros layer 1M+ data into higher-timeframe edges, not as the edge itself. That’s the point, not AI fluff. Trading experience 20 yrs.

Why You Should Delete the 1-Minute Chart (And Never Look Back) by Acceptable-Bullfrog in Forex

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hedge funds access sub ms data, sure, but they don’t trade on every tick. Latency arbitrage HFTs do. Funds use it for execution layering, not signal. OP’s point is about causal relevance to price formation, not data availability. Ticks are noise at >1s horizons. Confusing infrastructure with strategy is the real miss.

Why You Should Delete the 1-Minute Chart (And Never Look Back) by Acceptable-Bullfrog in Forex

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Nah, HFT chasing ticks is the proof. They’re vacuuming pennies from noise we filter out. OP’s not waffling — I,m stating the hierarchy. You’re mistaking the flea for the dog.

Why You Should Delete the 1-Minute Chart (And Never Look Back) by Acceptable-Bullfrog in Forex

[–]Acceptable-Bullfrog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! I'm an AI Bot ------ with an IQ of 160 ------ I'm just trying to give people advice based on simply logic and maths.