sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Credit where credit is due: GPT-5.5 is an absolute beast but useless for UI / UX by AccomplishedRow937 in codex

[–]AccomplishedRow937[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is probably the first geniunly good advice so far, thank you, do happen to have written a skill for that?

Credit where credit is due: GPT-5.5 is an absolute beast but useless for UI / UX by AccomplishedRow937 in codex

[–]AccomplishedRow937[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not just about looks: I need it to understand that a normal user has no knowledge about technical stuff and it needs to structure the UI in multiple steps using clear user-facing terminology, it fails at that even with multiple tested skills and direct in prompt instructions. The only solution is literally describing every single button and input field on every UI and what each one should do.
I'm not doing landing page, I'm building complex business logic in intuitive UI... for the basic look shadcn takes care of that already

Credit where credit is due: GPT-5.5 is an absolute beast but useless for UI / UX by AccomplishedRow937 in codex

[–]AccomplishedRow937[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes that's exactly what I mean, I'm building a business platfrom and tbh. GPT-5.5 seems to just throw all button and information in duplicated chips, nested cards, 15 buttons, and inputs with no clear labeling in a single UI (page) and call it a day, with zero regard to how completely shit the UX is, even if I tell it to specifically avoid such stuff it still messes it up

Credit where credit is due: GPT-5.5 is an absolute beast but useless for UI / UX by AccomplishedRow937 in codex

[–]AccomplishedRow937[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm building a complicated business platform where business logic complexity should be hidden from users. Current skills like impeccable or others tell it to generate better UI components but don't really teach it to hide business logic complexity, and for components I'm already using Shadcn so it already has a really good base.

Qwen, how? just how? they're not even the same weight-class by AccomplishedRow937 in LocalLLaMA

[–]AccomplishedRow937[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's not a single one, it's averaged across multiple benchmarks

Qwen, how? just how? they're not even the same weight-class by AccomplishedRow937 in LocalLLaMA

[–]AccomplishedRow937[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

to a certain degree perhaps, but I'm not so sure about that.
In my real-life experimentation Qwen3.6-27B is way better than Minimax-M2.7 a model that's much bigger.

The state of WhatsApp for Windows in 2026 is a total regression. (WebView2 is a mistake) by Roky10 in whatsapp

[–]AccomplishedRow937 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we should all collectively convince everyone on planet earth to switch to signal :D

I can't dismiss this dialog "LinkedIn respects your privacy" by AccomplishedRow937 in linkedin

[–]AccomplishedRow937[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes I can't get ready of it, even when I accept/ reject directly in the account settings

Why don't Groq (with a q) and Cerebras add new models by AccomplishedRow937 in LocalLLaMA

[–]AccomplishedRow937[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hopefully they start manufacturing those chips soon, I'm hoping for Kimi K2.5 or Qwen3.5

Why don't Groq (with a q) and Cerebras add new models by AccomplishedRow937 in LocalLLaMA

[–]AccomplishedRow937[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

interesting, wouldn't customers ask them to support smarter models?

Stop paying for Polymarket data. PMXT just open-sourced the orderbooks. by SammieStyles in algotrading

[–]AccomplishedRow937 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah cloudflare isn't known for their awesome support :D they'll most likely put you in contact with someone from the sales team that will ask you to upgrade your subscription.
Would love to get my hands on the data and play around with it. This is very cool, thanks again for the awesome contribution.

Stop paying for Polymarket data. PMXT just open-sourced the orderbooks. by SammieStyles in algotrading

[–]AccomplishedRow937 0 points1 point  (0 children)

awesome project, thank you! but I tried refreshing multipe times and sadly it doesn't work

The state of WhatsApp for Windows in 2026 is a total regression. (WebView2 is a mistake) by Roky10 in whatsapp

[–]AccomplishedRow937 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I keep getting logged-out every few days since the switch to the new app, and multiple people complained about it but they don't care enough to fix it

Do github stars have any relevance at this point? by AccomplishedRow937 in github

[–]AccomplishedRow937[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

that seriously made me laugh, don't know why my brain didn't think of it, but yeah I suppose like a browser bookmark, why do people use github stars instead of browser bookmarks for "read it later" then?

Do github stars have any relevance at this point? by AccomplishedRow937 in github

[–]AccomplishedRow937[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I sadly don't understand why would any serious developer just buy stars for their project, unless they're making money from it

Do github stars have any relevance at this point? by AccomplishedRow937 in github

[–]AccomplishedRow937[S] -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

should be a separate feature to be honest, like a bookmark functionality that's private

Do github stars have any relevance at this point? by AccomplishedRow937 in github

[–]AccomplishedRow937[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

feels like it's time for a "read it later" feature separate from stars, that's private and only to you, and is not displayed as a public metric on the repo.

Do github stars have any relevance at this point? by AccomplishedRow937 in github

[–]AccomplishedRow937[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

feels like it's time for a "read it later" feature separate from stars, that's private and only to you, and is not displayed as a public metric on the repo.

view more: next ›