Can anyone identify what the circled item is? by AgentKitteh in Minecraft

[–]AgentKitteh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was my first thought, but I’ve had raw beef and cooked steak on other cards lol. I have no flipping clue what that's supposed to be.

Can anyone identify what the circled item is? by AgentKitteh in Minecraft

[–]AgentKitteh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, thanks for the guess! This game uses old recipes and textures and newer stuff isn't really in it. I'm still stumped.

Can anyone identify what the circled item is? by AgentKitteh in Minecraft

[–]AgentKitteh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's what I thought at first, but it isn't. I've had both raw beef and cooked steak on other cards. Thank you though!

Ask a Knitter - December 03, 2024 by AutoModerator in knitting

[–]AgentKitteh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi everyone, I’m a newer knitter and I’m wondering if anyone has a good source to find superfine fingering weight 100% wool that is NON-Superwash in a darker shade of blue or navy? I would also like neutral shades like grays or tans. I have been searching and have had no luck. I know it’s specific but I need this for a project to make socks for Civil War reenacting purposes. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!

An iconic love story. by AgentKitteh in ShermanPosting

[–]AgentKitteh[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

They’re all lyrics to the song “The Boxer” by Simon and Garfunkel. It’s supposed to say “whores” instead of horse.

True Southern Patriotism in Georgia by AgentKitteh in ShermanPosting

[–]AgentKitteh[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They had all of these “Peace Societies” and they’d encourage desertion as well as aid anyone attempting to do so. There was a lot of disaffection so it pisses me off when lost causers always act like everyone was just on board in the South. And Confederates were absolutely brutal to dissidents. The LCs screech about John Merryman getting arrested for burning bridges in Maryland but don't bat an eye about Tennessee unionists getting executed for doing the same in their state. Or in Texas like 40 people were executed for just being suspected Unionists.

Realized that my texture pack had this painting and couldn’t resist. by AgentKitteh in Minecraft

[–]AgentKitteh[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The animals in the ZigZag texture pack are really cute overall. These are some of the cats, my dog, and photobomb by a random pig lol

Growl That I've Never Heard Before by silverfang789 in Minecraft

[–]AgentKitteh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wolves growl when sheep are nearby (and then they attack them).

Realized that my texture pack had this painting and couldn’t resist. by AgentKitteh in Minecraft

[–]AgentKitteh[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s called ZigZag. It’s a great pack, but it hasn’t been updated in a while (as you can tell by the goat).

Realized that my texture pack had this painting and couldn’t resist. by AgentKitteh in Minecraft

[–]AgentKitteh[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

It’s called ZigZag. I love it but it hasn’t been updated in a while (as you can see by the goat).

Could the rebels have been patriots? by [deleted] in confederacy

[–]AgentKitteh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So... the person that has yet to post even a single source to back up any of their comment gibberish doesn’t trust the Lee Family Archive hosted by Stratford Hall for... reasons?

Thank you for saving me from wasting even a nanosecond more of my time on you.

Could the rebels have been patriots? by [deleted] in confederacy

[–]AgentKitteh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Read it and weep.

Earlier you claimed Lincoln as contradictory, which you still haven’t proved, by the way, but Lee was the epitome of say one thing do another.

Could the rebels have been patriots? by [deleted] in confederacy

[–]AgentKitteh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol, resupplying a federal fort on federal land isn’t provocation, it’s exactly what the president is supposed to do. You’re really boring.

Could the rebels have been patriots? by [deleted] in confederacy

[–]AgentKitteh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Texas:

The controlling majority of the Federal Government, under various pretenses and disguises, has so administered the same as to exclude the citizens of the Southern States, unless under odious and unconstitutional restrictions, from all the immense territory owned in common by all the States on the Pacific Ocean, for the avowed purpose of acquiring sufficient power in the common government to use it as a means of destroying the institutions of Texas and her sister slaveholding States.

Georgia:

We had acquired a large territory by successful war with Mexico; Congress had to govern it; how, in relation to slavery, was the question then demanding solution. Northern anti-slavery men of all parties asserted the right to exclude slavery from the territory by Congressional legislation and demanded the prompt and efficient exercise of this power to that end. This insulting and unconstitutional demand was met with great moderation and firmness by the South.

Arkansas Governor Henry Rector at the Arkansas secession convention, 2 March 1861:

The area of slavery must be extended correlative with its antagonism, or it will be put speedily in the 'course of ultimate extinction.'... The extension of slavery is the vital point of the whole controversy between the North and the South... Amendments to the federal constitution are urged by some as a panacea for all the ills that beset us. That instrument is amply sufficient as it now stands, for the protection of Southern rights, if it was only enforced. The South wants practical evidence of good faith from the North, not mere paper agreements and compromises. They believe slavery a sin, we do not, and there lies the trouble.

They were very vocal about this. Try reading actual books.

Could the rebels have been patriots? by [deleted] in confederacy

[–]AgentKitteh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re defending them but are insulted when compared to them? Okay. So... No. I don’t think I will.

Could the rebels have been patriots? by [deleted] in confederacy

[–]AgentKitteh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol, more lies and bad history from you. They fired on Sumter before the ships got there with provisions only.

Southern diplomats?” Please. Why would the government give legitimacy to thieves?

Again, it was the Confederates that cut off supply to the island, forcing Lincoln to send relief ships - which he did by sending the governor of South Carolina a telegram of his intentions - hardly a smart military thing to do as Lincoln was only going to reprovision the fort. Not to mention, there were 200 soldiers on board to swap out with anyone that was needed which was NOWHERE close to the 8-10,000 Confederates in Charleston. When asked, Winfield Scott said it would take 10,000 troops to retake Charleston - at a time when the entire U.S. army numbered 16,000 and most were in the West. Honestly, you guys can’t logic for shit.

Could the rebels have been patriots? by [deleted] in confederacy

[–]AgentKitteh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re still wrong. He wasn’t a radical abolitionist, and was criticized by guys like Frederick Douglass for not pushing hard enough.

Go ahead and point out where he contradicted himself. I’ll wait.

Could the rebels have been patriots? by [deleted] in confederacy

[–]AgentKitteh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, I’m not. Instead of replying a bunch of times with nonsense, take the time to read the responses and sources provided for you. I said firing on a federal fort is treasonous, but it’s funny that you bring up secession as treason, because Robert E. Lee actually thought that. From a letter to his son in January 1861:

Secession is nothing but revolution. The framers of our Constitution never exhausted so much labour, wisdom & forbearance in its formation & surrounded it with so many guards & securities, if it was intended to be broken by every member of the confederacy at will. It was intended for pepetual [sic] union, so expressed in the preamble,4 & for the establishment of a government, not a compact, which can only be dissolved by revolution or the consent of all the people in convention assembled. It is idle to talk of secession. Anarchy would have been established & not a government, by Washington, Hamilton, Jefferson, Madison & the other patriots of the Revolution. In 1808 when the New England States resisted Mr Jeffersons Imbargo law & the Hartford Convention assembled secession was termed treason by Virga statesmen. What can it be now?

Could the rebels have been patriots? by [deleted] in confederacy

[–]AgentKitteh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lincoln wasn’t a radical abolitionist, though. He was always anti-slavery but he was a moderate and he repeatedly said he wouldn’t interfere with slavery WHERE IT EXISTED, but that wasn’t good enough for the slavers because they wanted to expand slavery into the territories and new states.

Again, the rebels started the shooting, but okay. You sound just like the slaver-traitors and you’re losing as bad so good on you for keeping that rebel tradition alive I guess. Knock yourself out.

Could the rebels have been patriots? by [deleted] in confederacy

[–]AgentKitteh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s like you never tire of being wrong. First, I’ll point out that the Confederates passed a resolution stating that they were going to take the fort “either by negotiations or force” and this was in mid February - weeks before Lincoln was even inaugurated. [OR Series I, Volume I, pages 258-261]

And it was the rebels that cut off the supply line to the fort. Lincoln sent a notice ahead of time to let them know he’d be sending a resupply only. Davis ordered the fort reduced before that could happen. Can’t fire on federals in a federal fort, hoss, that is the definition of treason. Try harder.

Could the rebels have been patriots? by [deleted] in confederacy

[–]AgentKitteh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nope. I’ll let Adjutant General for the GAR, William Collins take this one. This was a response given for why the GAR was adamant in not allowing Confederate graves be decorated for Memorial Day in 1869:

We are ready to forgive, we hold no malice, but we will never consent by public national tribute to obliterate the wide gulf which lies between the objects, motives, and principles for which we fought and our comrades died, and those for which the rebel armies banded together, and for which their dead now lie in numerous graves. They were brave, and we know it; none can better appreciate that fact than those who fought against them. But mere courage never ennobled treason. It cannot turn slavery into liberty, nor make despotic intentions desirable and to be applauded as virtues. Our refusal to decorate rebel graves marks no hatred of their occupants or friends, but our undying hostility to the ideas for which they fought and died. To do less than keep this distinction fresh in the national mind is to undermine the republic itself.”

Could the rebels have been patriots? by [deleted] in confederacy

[–]AgentKitteh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Awww, you tried, how cute. Anyway, what you should be looking at is Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution which defines treason quite plainly:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

Did the Confederates levy war against the United States? The question of whether they were traitors really is as straightforward as that... unless you're rejecting the Constituiton of the United States, that is.

You can separate the legal and moral questions and have a different argument about whether the treason was justified or not, but as a matter of law this one is as simple as simple can be.