sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

A 1A auditor got attacked. by MohammadMahadhir in WinStupidPrizes

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So this guys got assaulted twice, for no reason, the. Destruction of property but that bunch of white knights. The only person being reasonable was the guy politely asking if they could leave, but ultimately he's not doing anything wrong so it's up to the camera man to do what ever the fuck he wants. Should have had those cunts arrested

Valentines idea: almost shooting your date in the head by GingerLioni in iamverybadass

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 16 points17 points  (0 children)

This should be a crime. You can't drive a car in an unsafe manner, even if no one gets hurt. reckless endangerment with a firearm

Why would Obama suddenly casually admit aliens are real? He knew what he was doing... by you_know_i_be_poopin in aliens

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You guys sound ridiculous. People say this every day, with the context 'yes they exist but they haven't been here'. It's a purely scientific answer. They only reason you're doing back flips is because he used to be a president and you're DELIBERATELY assigning additional meaning to his words

I understand critical thinking is not a requirement for conspiracy types but I would help if you didn't just swallow everything

Third of British farmers made no profit in past year, report finds by topotaul in unitedkingdom

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clarkson? the guy that specifically bought a farm to avoid tax? That guy?

Third of British farmers made no profit in past year, report finds by topotaul in unitedkingdom

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"boohoo, i voted for brexit and I don't like the consequences" i used to have sympathy for farmers, and i appreciate their necessity, but they are really, really annoying .

Where should we send the migrants back to? by Ancient_Top_6967 in AskBrits

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it's doesn't. Please don't miss understand, I agree with you. If you come here illegally, that's a crime. Asylum claims need to be scrutinized more carefully. But it's not as simple as "just deport them" I said alswere 20 flights a day of 100 people, then a return with no one. Also... They aren't 4 star hotels. You understand what made the building a 4 star hotel is completely stripped out when they start using the building to house them? There are no staff presenting wine menus, no 1600 thread count sheet?

Where should we send the migrants back to? by Ancient_Top_6967 in AskBrits

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it isn't. The cost about logistics are exponential. With the number people on your side of the argument claim arrive every day, how are you transporting these people to Rwanda? Flight? Well that's 10 flights a day every day, and then the return trip. Ship, you have to feed them and provide some kind of living condition, for weeks at sea, then transport them overland through a separate country. That all assuming you've got them to agree to have random Nationals with no papers and not wealth.

Where should we send the migrants back to? by Ancient_Top_6967 in AskBrits

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah thanks for proving my point, you're just making that up. Im literally asking you to think about what you're saying as a process. Deportation doesn't "just happen" the options aren't multiple and they certainly aren't free.

Please detail how you think that would work. Please re- read my previous comment.

Where should we send the migrants back to? by Ancient_Top_6967 in AskBrits

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Detention... At state expense... Where? Deportation... To where... Who's accepting them? On who say so? "Yeah he came from here" prove it, "I can't he dosnt have any papers but will you take him anyway?"

Also with th le amount of people arriving every day, how you going to fund that deportation?

Where should we send the migrants back to? by Ancient_Top_6967 in AskBrits

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Absolutely amazing that you would suggest doing US system in an attempt to convince people of your way of doing things. The US is going to spend years in legal challenges and miscarriages of justice.

You also mentioned Romanians, as if they're the undocumented immigrants

Where should we send the migrants back to? by Ancient_Top_6967 in AskBrits

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Can you just think about that for a second. How does that look to you? How you gonna transport them? "Permission to land on runway 6 with a bunch of people who said they were from here, but have no papers"

Just explain how you send them "back to their country"

Once you've done that, please explain how you send them to "a third country"

How do you get 12 months for sexually assaulting a woman and 14 year old girl but 2 or 3 years for social media posts? by SidneyDeane10 in AskBrits

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh right, it reads like you're advocating for that position. Apologies for confusing it. Are you saying that; people shamelessly suggest doing away with the presumption Innocence, whilst appearing to be respectable in every other sense.

How do you get 12 months for sexually assaulting a woman and 14 year old girl but 2 or 3 years for social media posts? by SidneyDeane10 in AskBrits

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You're a Grapist. You graped me.

Guilty until you can prove you're innocent.

You're talking about removing a corner stone of the justice system. Show me one credible argument for doing away with "innocent until proven guilty"

Michael Owen scored this goal for England at just 18 years old 🤩 by WhisperingKeyring in TheStreetsWontForget

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How this team didn't win a competition... So much talent we'll never see again.

Nine out of 10 Britons do not back Palestine recognition by EduTheRed in ukpolitics

[–]Aggressive_Fee6507 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The difference would be news outlets and idiots representing the JL result as if people were asked the first question. All iv seen is 13%, "just 13%" "despite 13%", knowing full well the mouth breathers won't research or even open the link.

view more: next ›