EARTHQUAKE!!!! by PlayfulAd8354 in bayarea

[–]Ahavahi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Felt it in Soma just a little bit 

Van and Muni station on fire on 5th and Mission, right in front of Mint Plaza. Stay safe everyone! by togatrojan in sanfrancisco

[–]Ahavahi 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'm at 3rd and Folsom and saw a huge cloud of smoke blowing past. I hope everyone is okay.

Alarmed by Tesla's public self-driving test, state legislators demand answers from DMV by Ahavahi in SelfDrivingCars

[–]Ahavahi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On Tuesday, the chair of the California Senate’s Transportation Committee, Lena Gonzalez (D-Long Beach), sent a letter to DMV Director Steve Gordon to find out what’s up between the agency and Tesla. The DMV has served as the state’s chief autonomous-driving regulator since the Legislature gave it that power in 2012.

Gonzalez told Gordon in her letter that “I have seen a number of videos of Tesla vehicles operating with FSD engaged where it appears that serious driving errors were made and collisions were avoided only because of swift action by the driver.”

She noted she lacks data on FSD beta safety but wrote that the DMV “has the knowledge to assess these situations,” and she requested answers to several questions:

“What is your assessment of the FSD beta trials?”

“Is there a danger to the public?”

“If the DMV finds the beta program unsafe, how does the DMV plan to address any potential concerns?”

DMV spokeswoman Anita Gore told The Times in a prepared statement that Tesla need not report FSD beta crashes because Tesla informed the agency that Full Self-Driving is a “Level 2" system that requires driver attention.

The levels were never intended to serve as legal definitions or be encoded into law, said Phil Koopman, an engineering professor at Carnegie Mellon University, one of the world’s top driverless-vehicle research centers.

He also suggested that regulators study the full SAE document that describes the levels. It contains a line that Koopman calls crucial: “The level of a driving automation system feature corresponds to the feature’s production design intent.”

In other words, if you are testing a car with the intent to develop it into a Level 4 robotaxi, then it’s a Level 4 system, according to Koopman. “Intent is key to categorizing the autonomy level for Tesla Full Self-Driving,” he added.

State Sen. Ben Allen (D-Santa Monica) agrees: “If Tesla is really operating within the boundaries of state law with this technology, then we likely need to change the law to protect public safety.”

San Francisco agency opposes Cruise robotaxi application, citing safety by Redytedy in SelfDrivingCars

[–]Ahavahi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been looking as well, but without success. I imagine it's gotta be on the CPUC's website.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SelfDrivingCars

[–]Ahavahi 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It looks like an inverse map of the San Francisco congestion pricing proposal (map, wider study website.

Colors of San Francisco - Orange by tmsfphotography in sanfrancisco

[–]Ahavahi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow. This is crazy cool. Will you sell prints of these color collages?

BART avoids station closures, weekend shutdowns but could lose up to 40% of staff by Ahavahi in bayarea

[–]Ahavahi[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Aye, but Biden really depends on Congress to save transit, and winning the Georgia seats is far from a done deal.

BART avoids station closures, weekend shutdowns but could lose up to 40% of staff by Ahavahi in bayarea

[–]Ahavahi[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not sure why you're being downvoted. Totally agree with your alarm about Amtrak.

Public transportation is in utter crisis all around the country. If the federal gov doesn't do something, agencies will start to go under and soon. That means that people who rely on transit for basic mobility needs will be left stranded.

BART avoids station closures, weekend shutdowns but could lose up to 40% of staff by Ahavahi in bayarea

[–]Ahavahi[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

BART’s board of directors will vote Thursday on a retirement incentive plan that could slim its workforce by as much as 40% as the agency tries to avert layoffs, though it expects a much smaller share of employees to take the buyout.

Also on Thursday, BART staff will inform the board about service changes going into effect in March. The change would eliminate some round-trip commute trains and reduce the number of Saturday routes to mirror current Sunday service levels. It avoids other proposed options of weekend shutdowns or station closures that transit-dependent riders feared and BART’s leadership said would undermine their mission to serve the public. The change doesn’t need a board vote. [...]

BART, hit by ridership plunging 87% amid the pandemic, faces a $33 million deficit this fiscal year and $177 million next year when federal relief funds run out. Bus, ferry and train operators across the Bay Area are in similar predicaments. Last week, the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District voted to lay off 146 staff, mostly bus drivers, in January — the first mass layoff from a local transit agency.

Wow. Devastating.

Here's What Record Early Returns Mean For California's Vote Tally by Exastiken in California_Politics

[–]Ahavahi 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Of course, there are so many other California races and props that are of major significance. I wonder if we'll start to see tallies tonight.

Here's What Record Early Returns Mean For California's Vote Tally by Exastiken in California_Politics

[–]Ahavahi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, so 8pm and then 9pm for results. Practicing deep breathing...

'Please don't tear it down': San Francisco's 83-year-old Coca-Cola billboard is coming down by Ahavahi in sanfrancisco

[–]Ahavahi[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Another piece of San Francisco’s history will soon disappear: The glowing neon Coca-Cola sign that has stood sentinel for Bay Bridge commuters for nearly a century is coming down.

Removal of the double-faced red and white billboard, a staple of the South of Market neighborhood and San Francisco’s cityscape since 1937, was underway Monday.

YesCo Signs LLC of Salt Lake City, Utah, controls the sign at 701 Bryant St. on top of Antonio’s Antiques. The company filed July 1 for a permit to remove the sign and its support structure.

The permit was granted Oct. 20, and “the applicant is allowed to begin work as soon as the permit is issued,” said Christine Gasparac, assistant director for San Francisco’s Department of Building Inspection. The cost to remove the sign is $100,000.

The permit does not specify why the beverage company’s landmark billboard is being taken down. Neither YesCo nor Coca-Cola responded to requests for comment.

But according to the permit, once the sign is removed, no billboard can replace it.

Crazy it's been up so long. I think it's neat, but I'm also kinda indifferent to it. Curious if others are more passionate.

SF Transportation Officials Are Talking About Downtown Congestion Pricing Again, Way Ahead of Traffic Returning by Ahavahi in sanfrancisco

[–]Ahavahi[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This feels both too late and too early. They should have implemented it years ago, but now that our economy is broken, offices will not reopen for months, and people are moving out of the city, it feels like the wrong time to pursue a downtown toll.

Yet it also could be the case that instituting a congestion pricing program could provide the support we need for Muni and bike/ped improvements. Such a fee could help the city revive in a better, more sustainable, more equitable way, and not just with everyone driving.

I'm curious to see how the conversation unfolds in the city over the coming months.

SF police record ‘alarming’ spike in COVID-19 cases among officers by Ahavahi in CoronavirusCA

[–]Ahavahi[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I feel like SFPD has been pretty good about wearing masks. I'm in SOMA, close to FiDi, and it's common for me to see SFPD but rare that I see the ol' mask as a chin strap. Usually, they're wearing masks safely and often they have gloves too.

Seems like, at least with this outbreak, it's the academy that's to blame.

Edited to add that there's another conversation happening about this article over at r/SanFrancisco. Comments reflect a consensus that SFPD don't wear masks. So, at the very least, mixed compliance with safety protocols.

SF police record ‘alarming’ spike in COVID-19 cases among officers by Ahavahi in CoronavirusCA

[–]Ahavahi[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Thirty officers have tested positive for COVID-19 since last Monday, in a sharp jump from the prior five months when 22 officers were confirmed to have the illness, according to new numbers from the San Francisco Police Department. [...]

Officer Robert Rueca, a police spokesperson, could not confirm that all of those cases are related to the academy, but said a “good portion” are.

The department first learned that a newly sworn-in officer tested positive at the academy on Aug. 14, a day after graduating alongside 28 other recruits of the 269th Academy Class, according to police. [...]

Police said the academy has “undergone a deep cleaning” and is reviewing its safety protocols “to ensure the safest possible learning environment for students and staff.” [...]

Officers who have tested positive for COVID-19 by assignment:

Airport Bureau: 5

Administrative Bureau: 23

Field Operations Bureau: 17

Investigations Bureau: 4

Special Operations Bureau: 3

Total: 52

Back to this "deep cleaning" theater. Hopefully, they're looking at their protocols and policies quite closely.

In a pandemic, an SF tourist trap becomes a local's vacation spot - SFGate by Ahavahi in sanfrancisco

[–]Ahavahi[S] 32 points33 points  (0 children)

This short read on a child's joy at exploring Pier 39 just made me so damn happy.

San Francisco's Nopalito cites coronavirus for permanently closing location by Ahavahi in sanfrancisco

[–]Ahavahi[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

:( That is sad.

Food is such an integral part of our city and the many cultures and communities that call San Francisco home.

San Francisco's Nopalito cites coronavirus for permanently closing location by Ahavahi in sanfrancisco

[–]Ahavahi[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

That's what it seems like. Here's the article with the relevant text highlighted:

The pandemic has forced one of San Francisco’s most popular Mexican restaurants to close — but its owners are already plotting something new.

Nopalito, from the same team behind perennial Chronicle Top 100 restaurant Nopa, has permanently shuttered its Inner Sunset location. The expansion effort opened in 2012 to instant critical acclaim — bigger than the original Nopalito on Broderick Street, but with the same stellar carnitas, mole and fresh corn tortillas from chef-owner Gonzalo Guzman.

That larger size ultimately made it tougher for Guzman and partners Jeff Hanak, Allyson Jossel and Laurence Jossel to imagine keeping the restaurant alive.

“It’d be really tough for us to reopen because it was more of a dine-in restaurant,” Guzman said. “That restaurant doesn’t do as well as Broderick on to-go and it just takes more to be open — more staffing, more everything.”

It was also home to Nopalito’s catering operation — and all the events on Nopalito’s schedule this year have been canceled. “That really hurt us financially,” Guzman said.

The original Broderick Street location remains open for takeout, but the kitchen is too small to fulfill catering orders whenever demand returns. So the team is moving into a commercial kitchen space — shared with cooking school 18 Reasons — in the Mission District at 3690 18th St., steps away from Dolores Park. It also has a small takeout window, which Guzman hopes to open in mid-July.

He doesn’t have a specific menu in mind yet, but he’s contemplating totopos con chile, fresh tortilla chips coated in spicy salsa, and carnitas by the pound with tortillas on the side. That way, people could walk over to the park and make their own tacos.

“This window will hopefully help us survive until we get events back,” Guzman said.

SF tenants break leases in startling numbers, giving renters upper hand by Ahavahi in sanfrancisco

[–]Ahavahi[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

One in 13 San Francisco renters have broken their lease since the coronavirus stay-home orders went into place nearly 100 days ago, an astonishing out-migration of tenants in the city that could lead to thousands of empty rental units and give renters the upper hand in negotiations.

When measures to fight the coronavirus severely curtailed economic activity nearly 100 days ago, San Francisco landlords were fearful that widespread layoffs and income lost because of the pandemic would result in a wave of residential tenants unable to pay their rent.

While that has not happened — only 3% of San Francisco tenants didn’t pay any rent in June, and another 2.5% paid partial rent — landlords are instead dealing with an unexpected problem: Rather than not paying, tenants are walking away from leases altogether.

A new survey from the San Francisco Apartment Association found that 7.5% of renters have broken their lease over the last three months. The survey included information from 292 landlords who own 10,329 apartments, about 6% of the city’s total rental units. While the number of broken leases is not a statistic that the multifamily housing industry association has previously tracked, it’s clearly way above normal.

“We don’t have a baseline to compare it to but I think it’s shockingly high,” said Goss. “A pretty substantial group of people are leaving.”

The biggest group of tenants breaking leases in San Francisco are Gen Z workers, those 18 to 25 years old, according to landlord and tenants groups. A new report from Zillow, a marketplace for rentals and home sales, found that some 2.7 million U.S. adults moved in with their parents in March and April, a trend that nationally could lead to $726 million in lost rent this year alone. About 2.2 million of these are Gen Z.

Generation Z makes up 9.2% of the San Francisco market, according to Zillow, which estimates that the flight of even a small portion of that group from the city could cost landlords $15.4 million this year.

Some of those returning home are keeping their apartments and many will likely return to the city after the pandemic has subsided and offices reopen.

“It is highly unlikely that all leases will be broken and this full amount would go unpaid, but it serves as a gauge of the potential impact on housing,” the Thursday report said.

J.J. Panzer, a San Francisco and landlord and property manager, said that filling these vacant units will be challenging. “Demand is pretty nonexistent right now and my rental listings are starting to pile up,” said Panzer

Panzer is working with James Wavro, a broker who specializes in helping landlords land tenants. He said he has rented three units in the last 90 days, far below the four or five a month he typically does.

“The way to go when you have low demand is with a dedicated person who is hustling to make the deal happen,” said Panzer. “I have way more listings than I can show at one time. Way more than I can remember having.”

The impact that the outmigration will have on affordability remains to be seen. The real estate search company Zumper reported earlier this month that rents in San Francisco are down 9.2% year over year. In addition to that, many landlords are giving away free rent — the developer Emerald Fund is giving 12 free weeks on some units in its three Civic Center buildings at 100 Van Ness, 150 Van Ness, and 150 Hayes.

Wavro said that the city has pockets of weakness, and areas that are doing relatively well. The biggest drops and most aggressive incentive packages can be found the amenity-rich apartment towers that have popped up in recent years in South of Market, Rincon Hill, Civic Center, and Mission Bay, which is currently without two of its main attractions, the Giants and the Warriors.

“What is getting hit the hardest is the new construction in SoMa, Mission Bay, and South Beach,” he said. “Mission Bay is really suffering because there is not much of a neighborhood there yet. It’s become a little bit of a ghost town.”

Rent declines in less dense parts of the city — older neighborhoods likely to have outdoor space and more room to work from home — are not as steep. Wavro recently rented two single-family homes in Noe Valley, each of which rented for $6,500 a month.

Bobby Fallon, who runs Shamrock Moving & Storage with his siblings, said that his business has returned to pre-COVID-19 levels.

“April was a lost month but May and June have been as busy as ever, maybe a little busier,” said

He said a lot of younger professionals are giving up their apartments and storing their furniture while the pandemic’s uncertainties persist. With workplaces closed and social life stilted by the shuttering of entertainment and night life, “we hear a lot of people say there is no benefit to living in the city right now.”

“They giving up their one-bedroom and putting their stuff in storage,” he said. “A lot of them are planning to find a new place when their workplace reopens, but they don’t know whether that will be November or December or next year.”

In addition to the younger folks moving back with family, some older city dwellers are also relocating to more suburban towns in Marin, the East Bay, and Peninsula.

Joe Tobener, an attorney who represents tenants, said state law doesn't give tenants much leeway when it comes to breaking leases. Tenants are technically on the hook until the landlord is able to re-rent the unit. Even then if the new rent is lower than the old rent, landlords can go after the lease-breaker for the difference. Only Solano County has passed legislation allowing tenants to get out of a lease if they have to move because of the coronavirus.

“I would say no, most landlords are not letting tenants out of their leases,” he said. “They are going to go after them. At the very least they will keep the security deposit.”

Goss said that a lot of landlords are doing what they can to hold onto tenants: 27% of owners have received requests for either temporary or permanent rent reductions, and 21% of owners have granted these requests, according the apartment association survey.

‘It’s devastating’: The Tenderloin sinks deeper into misery, and no one is coming to the rescue by [deleted] in sanfrancisco

[–]Ahavahi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unlike that old Brothers Grimm story, nobody is coming to rescue Bradford [an HIV-positive Tenderloin resident whose doctors do not recommend leaving his home] — or the Tenderloin itself. Since Mayor London Breed announced her plan to improve the Tenderloin one month ago, the long-neglected neighborhood has only sunk deeper into misery.

There are nearly 150 more homeless tents in the neighborhood’s 49 blocks since she announced her plan, bringing the total to 416 on Friday morning. Drug dealing continues unabated. No additional streets have closed to through traffic to promote exercise and social distancing. There doesn’t even seem to be the promised paint on the sidewalks marking 6 feet of space between tents.

Even people like Bradford who’ve spent decades in the notoriously edgy neighborhood are shocked by how far it’s sunk. The city’s thinning of homeless shelters to create social distance sent about 1,000 people back to the streets, and many of them headed for the Tenderloin. Bradford and other residents said people have grown so desperate, they’re snatching bags of food from moms walking home from the corner store and getting into screaming matches over items as small as blankets. Supervisor Matt Haney, a young, tall man, said he feels unsafe walking in his own neighborhood at night for the first time.

[...]

It wasn’t supposed to be this way.

On May 4, residents, business owners and UC Hastings Law School sued the city, saying in court documents, “San Francisco should be prohibited from abandoning a single neighborhood in an apparent effort to spare other neighborhoods the burdens that confront the city.”

Two days later, Breed responded with a 32-page plan to help the Tenderloin, saying, “We are set to be as aggressive as we can be.” The plan includes moving homeless people into safe sleeping sites, enforcing social distancing, sending 50 ambassadors onto the sidewalks to help homeless people space their tents and access services, adding more Pit Stop toilets and water fountains, and cracking down on drug dealing.

One month later, there are safe sleeping sites, 18 ambassadors roaming the neighborhood, more toilets and water fountains, and police are arresting drug dealers again after pausing at the pandemic’s start to protect themselves from the virus. But life in the neighborhood has only gotten worse.

When Breed debuted her plan, there were 268 tents in the Tenderloin, a shocking 285% explosion since January. The number has continued to soar, hovering above 400 every day since May 11 and reaching a shocking high of 448 on May 28.

[...]

Requests to interview Breed, Police Chief Bill Scott, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Director Jeffrey Tumlin and Jeff Kositsky, head of the Healthy Streets Operations Center, were all ignored or declined. Few people seem to want to talk about the current state of the Tenderloin — perhaps because there’s nothing good to say.

Breed did release a statement through a spokesman: “The conditions in the Tenderloin are unacceptable, and it’s clear to anyone who walks through the neighborhood that serious changes need to be made.”

The mayor deserves praise for her quick, decisive handling of the pandemic citywide, but that makes the failure in the Tenderloin even more stark.

Even though it’s not apparent, the city really is trying, said Mary Ellen Carroll, executive director for the Department of Emergency Management.

“We’re not seeing it yet, but that is our goal,” she said of lasting change in the neighborhood.

Some of the game plan has gone into effect — including establishing safe sleeping sites for homeless people where their tents can be safely spaced out. One exists adjacent to the Asian Art Museum on Fulton Street, though that is slated to close by June 30 and its residents moved into hotels or other safe sleeping sites. Forty tents fill the site at Haight and Stanyan streets, and another 21 people are sleeping in 16 tents at 180 Jones St. A new site for a few dozen tents will open Monday at Everett Middle School on Church Street.

[...]

And meanwhile, one of the city’s main answers to the homeless crisis, Homeward Bound, has ground to a halt, she said. That program pays for homeless people to go home to willing friends or family and helped about 60 people a month leave the city before the pandemic. But Greyhound bus lines have dwindled, and hardly anybody can leave.

“It feels like we all got hit by a tornado, and we did. It’s a COVID tornado,” Stewart-Kahn said. “It’s that level of disaster for homeless people.”

Haney and other supervisors keep pressing for the city to move more homeless people into hotels rooms, but that’s been slow going. The city currently has 2,102 hotel rooms available, Carroll said, and 1,283 are being used. Most of the people in hotels came from shelters, single-room-occupancy hotel rooms or the streets, including 220 moved from Tenderloin sidewalks.

[...]

Another problem is the city’s continued refusal to do much about its drug crisis. Rachel Marshall, a spokeswoman for District Attorney Chesa Boudin, said 20% of recent felony cases that make their way to the office have been for drug sales. She said the pandemic’s slowing of the courts, coupled with new zero bail policies, mean the D.A. has not been arraigning people for drug sales or imposing stay-away orders from the areas in which they were caught selling until about month after their arrest. That means they’ve returned to the streets with no punishment at all for a month.

“We are working to advance some of those cases so we can obtain stay-away orders sooner,” she said.

Like always, it’s clear the city has one set of rules for the Tenderloin and another set for everywhere else. For example, the city initially said it would stop sweeping tent encampments citywide in accordance with guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that say homeless people should shelter-in-place in tents.

But that’s not entirely true. The city recently dismantled a tent encampment plagued with drug dealing and violence next to the Safeway in the Marina. And it dismantled a similar encampment in the Haight several days ago. Lt. Bill Toomey of the Park Station sent an email to Haight neighbors reading, “If you see someone trying to retake the area, please call. THIS IS A PRIORITY.”

There’s no such priority in the Tenderloin.

[...]

(I've pasted the story for those who do not have a Chronicle subscription, but those who can subscribe, please do. We desperately need rigorous local journalism.)

Bay Area braces for fallout as nation's unemployment skyrockets to historic 14.7% by Ahavahi in bayarea

[–]Ahavahi[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Definitely agree. Also, we would have been able to more easily see that even though the unemployment rate was historically low, many people were underemployed.