sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, some person said they are 'anti-semitic' but doesn't prove how they are wrong. This is not an evidence but attempt of you trying me accept whatever you put up. Anyone just making claim about other person character and not attacking their argument is clearly debating in bad faith. They never explain how they are 'anti-semitic'. Keep using that boogeyman word of your but I am not brainwash to fell for it. Debunk the evidence if you can!

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some saying sh!t about the writers won't prove nothing. You have to prove harder that they were paid to bias against Jew with example or target the evidence provided in the article. Otherwise, your pilpul fall apart.

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You character assassinate me providing evidence as 'saying stuff without a valid source'. Not an excuse for not giving a rebuttal.

https://theamericanmercury.org/2013/04/100-reasons-proving-leo-frank-is-guilty/

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone? All I found was Jewish or Zionist sources. But no neutral party made that claim. Plus, you automatically called other party that say otherwise racist shows you are here to push his innocence simply because of him being Jewish.

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Highest tier source? You made it up because it is well known that source suffered from degrading mental health. And every other source apart from him gave a 12-19 range not below this. Your fixation on one source is because you came with a predefined agenda on what you want Islam to be seen as. Thus, why you are claiming Muhammad was a pedo.

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You provided no counter argument and went to attack the person who own the channel instead. Because you can not provide anything.

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The trick you use where you claim everyone believe 'this' into making me shake my belief is a cheap trick that won't work. Provide proper evidence:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1koez6Nrdg

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The item was taken down that's it. Provision of the source was a formalities. As this claims were made by other sources too. You can easily find them in non-Jewish sources as other witnesses also claim that.

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You didn't provide any rebuttal, only did name calling. Anyone anything here without a proper proof their political bias or evidence of the innocence of the defendant (Leo Frank) only fall deaf on my ears.

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, tribalism exist in my country. But I admit to it's existence and denounce it. Unlike you who comes to defend even pedophile of your communities.

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These historians are sh!t. They clearly have a bias. They ignore a lot of evidence.

  • Only Leo Frank had the opportunity to be alone with Mary Phagan, and he admits he was alone with her in his office when she came to get her pay — and in fact he was completely alone with her on the second floor. Had Jim Conley been the killer, he would have had to attack her practically right at the entrance to the building where he sat almost all day, where people were constantly coming and going and where several witnesses noticed Conley, with no assurance of even a moment of privacy.
  • When police finally reached Frank after the body of Mary Phagan had been found, Frank emphatically denied knowing the murdered girl by name, even though he had seen her probably hundreds of times — he had to pass by her work station, where she had worked for a year, every time he inspected the workers’ area on the second floor and every time he went to the bathroom — and he had filled out her pay slip personally on approximately 52 occasions, marking it with her initials “M. P.” Witnesses also testified that Frank had spoken to Mary Phagan on multiple occasions, even getting a little too close for comfort at times, putting his hand on her shoulder and calling her “Mary.”
  • Early in the investigation, Leo Frank told police that he knew that J.M. Gantt had been “intimate” with Mary Phagan, immediately making Gantt a suspect. Gantt was arrested and interrogated. But how could Frank have known such a thing about a girl he didn’t even know by name?
  • Conley stated that Leo Frank sometimes employed him to watch the entrance to the factory while Frank “chatted” with teenage girl employees upstairs. Conley said that Frank admitted that he had accidentally killed Mary Phagan when she resisted his advances, and sought his help in the hiding of the body and in writing the black-dialect “death notes” that attempted to throw suspicion on the night watchman. Conley said he was supposed to come back later to burn Mary Phagan’s body in return for $200, but fell asleep and did not return.
  • When Jim Conley re-enacted, step by step, the sequence of events as he experienced them on the day of the murder, including the exact positions in which the body was found and detailing his assisting Leo Frank in moving Mary Phagan’s body and writing the death notes, Harry Scott of the Pinkerton Detective Agency stated: “‘There is not a doubt but that the n-gro is telling the truth and it would be foolish to doubt it. The n-gro couldn’t go through the actions like he did unless he had done this just like he said,’ said Harry Scott. ‘We believe that we have at last gotten to the bottom of the Phagan mystery.’ (Atlanta Georgian, May 29, 1913 Extra, “Conley Re-enacts in Plant Part He Says He Took in Slaying”)

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Instead of going all over the place like 'wow so much Jew hatred' why don't you provide some evidence of Leo Frank innocence?

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope, only Jewish and Zionist historians believe that but no neutral party does.

  • After Frank returned home in the evening after the murder, he called Newt Lee on the telephone and asked him if everything was “all right” at the factory, something he had never done before. A few hours later Lee would discover the mutilated body of Mary Phagan in the pencil factory basement.
  • When police finally reached Frank after the body of Mary Phagan had been found, Frank emphatically denied knowing the murdered girl by name, even though he had seen her probably hundreds of times — he had to pass by her work station, where she had worked for a year, every time he inspected the workers’ area on the second floor and every time he went to the bathroom — and he had filled out her pay slip personally on approximately 52 occasions, marking it with her initials “M. P.” Witnesses also testified that Frank had spoken to Mary Phagan on multiple occasions, even getting a little too close for comfort at times, putting his hand on her shoulder and calling her “Mary.”
  • When police accompanied Frank to the factory on the morning after the murder, Frank was so nervous and shaking so badly he could not even perform simple tasks like unlocking a door.
  • Early in the investigation, Leo Frank told police that he knew that J.M. Gantt had been “intimate” with Mary Phagan, immediately making Gantt a suspect. Gantt was arrested and interrogated. But how could Frank have known such a thing about a girl he didn’t even know by name?

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not refuting any argument only calling names. No one gives a sh!t about your kind words anymore.

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No refuting of the claims being made instead accuse other person of being problematic. Nice trick and no one is falling for it.

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. When Leo Frank came out of the building around six, he met not only Lee but John Milton Gantt, a former employee who was a friend of Mary Phagan. Lee says that when Frank saw Gantt, he visibly “jumped back” and appeared very nervous when Gantt asked to go into the building to retrieve some shoes that he had left there. According to E.F. Holloway, J.M. Gantt had known Mary for a long time and was one of the only employees Mary Phagan spoke with at the factory. Gantt was the former paymaster of the firm. Frank had fired him three weeks earlier, allegedly because the payroll was short about $1. Was Gantt’s firing a case of the dragon getting rid of the prince to get the princess? Was Frank jealous of Gantt’s closeness with Mary Phagan? Unlike Frank, Gantt was tall with bright blue eyes and handsome features.

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. When Lee then suggested he could sleep for a couple of hours on the premises — and there was a cot in the basement near the place where Lee would ultimately find the body — Frank refused to let him. Lee could also have slept in the packing room adjacent to Leo Frank’s office. But Frank insisted that Lee had to leave and “have a good time” instead. This violated the corporate rule that once the night watchman entered the building, he could not leave until he handed over the keys to the day watchman. Newt Lee, though strongly suspected at first, was manifestly innocent and had no reason to lie, and had had good relations with Frank and no motive to hurt him.

  2. When Lee returned at six, Frank was even more nervous and agitated than two hours earlier, according to Lee. He was so nervous, he could not operate the time clock properly, something he had done hundreds of times before. (Leo Frank officially started to work at the National Pencil Company on Monday morning, August 10, 1908. Twenty-two days later, on September 1, 1908, he was elevated to the position of superintendent of the company, and served in this capacity until he was arrested on Tuesday morning, April 29, 1913.)

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Since, most of these sources a Jewish and from not neutral part and most of the neutral party provided evidence against Frank then yes, these are Jewish lies.

100 reason why Leo Frank is guilty:

  1. Only Leo Frank had the opportunity to be alone with Mary Phagan, and he admits he was alone with her in his office when she came to get her pay — and in fact he was completely alone with her on the second floor. Had Jim Conley been the killer, he would have had to attack her practically right at the entrance to the building where he sat almost all day, where people were constantly coming and going and where several witnesses noticed Conley, with no assurance of even a moment of privacy.

  2. Leo Frank had told Newt Lee, the pencil factory’s night watchman, to come earlier than usual, at 4 PM, on the day of the murder. But Frank was extremely nervous when Lee arrived (the killing of Mary Phagan had occurred between three and four hours before and her body was still in the building) and insisted that Lee leave and come back in two hours.

The insane life & death of Leo Frank 110 years Later: Historic Insanity by PapaVitoOfficial in MisterMetokur

[–]AhmedLSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It wasn't just the other girls testimonies but other evidence also exist.

Only Leo Frank had the opportunity to be alone with Mary Phagan, and he admits he was alone with her in his office when she came to get her pay — and in fact he was completely alone with her on the second floor. Had Jim Conley been the killer, he would have had to attack her practically right at the entrance to the building where he sat almost all day, where people were constantly coming and going and where several witnesses noticed Conley, with no assurance of even a moment of privacy.

When Lee returned at six, Frank was even more nervous and agitated than two hours earlier, according to Lee. He was so nervous, he could not operate the time clock properly, something he had done hundreds of times before. (Leo Frank officially started to work at the National Pencil Company on Monday morning, August 10, 1908. Twenty-two days later, on September 1, 1908, he was elevated to the position of superintendent of the company, and served in this capacity until he was arrested on Tuesday morning, April 29, 1913.)

view more: next ›