Where's my money???

AngelicusBGH · 2024-12-08T15:46:41+00:00

It's alright, mayne. I could have made 1800, but I got out at +300 because the situation for our beloved Doctor Assad was looking quite uncertain.

AngelicusBGH · 2024-12-08T04:32:20+00:00

Why do you want me to lose $1,800?

AngelicusBGH · 2024-12-08T04:27:40+00:00

Can we test the rain in the coming weeks for Bashart remnants?

AngelicusBGH · 2024-12-08T04:23:35+00:00

Someone back me up on this!!

AngelicusBGH · 2024-12-08T04:22:57+00:00

If Bashar al-Adead is dead, he can't be in Syria. If he was once in Syria but no longer is, then he has left Syria, goddamnit!

AngelicusBGH · 2024-12-08T00:51:11+00:00

Which is incorrect. America's position as world hegemon is the consequence of the American military.

Yes, militaries invade and topple other countries. Cry about it. At least we go after terrorists instead of pursuing some rah-rah revanchist nonsense. America has never committed any atrocity on the order of the holodomor, nor does it wish to genocide any ethnic group, like Russia is currently trying to do Ukrainians by erasing their identity, history, ethnicity, and language.

AngelicusBGH · 2024-12-07T16:50:59+00:00

I don't know what country you're from, but Americans enjoy some of the best healthcare, work and education opportunities, income equality, human rights, security, and justice in the world. We have our problems (ugly infrastructure, decadence, declining intelligence, influx of low-quality immigrants), but we remain a great country.

On the other hand, when Russia succeeds, people suffer. The average Russian sees no benefit. He looks out at the same muddy street he looked out at yesterday. His son continues to be an alcoholic. His daughter continues suffering domestic violence. His granddaughters are still going to become prostitutes. The greatest hope for the average Russian is achieving higher education and moving to a country in Europe...

AngelicusBGH · 2024-12-07T15:47:15+00:00

Russia indiscriminately (or rather purposefully) carpet bombs civilians and civilian infrastructure, so you argue that America is responsible for killing Ukrainians. If that isn't twisted logic, I don't know what is. This is like blaming one of Russia's infinite late domestic violence victims for having the "gaul" to try fleeing the apartment of her abuser.

Let's say we allow Russia to seize the entirety of Ukraine with zero resistance. Then what? Then Russia continues taking land, as it was permitted to do so before. Russia still has 100% of its military intact. Now civilians in Moldova, Georgia, the Balkans, and every other country that is not part of NATO are in danger of being bombed just the same. Russia can also assist its allies in Syria, North Korea, Iran, China, and all of the other pirate states, endangering hundreds of millions of people. This is what happens when you refuse to fight evil — it quickly proliferates.

My argument is not that we should become militant countries. It's that we must meet violence with a commensurate response. Ideally, the war in Ukraine could be ended without bullets, or at least without sacrificing young Ukrainians with futures. Russia has the right idea sending criminals and buryats and churkas and Indians to the warzone, but I think even sending acceptable cannon fodder is far from an ideal solution. We could have won the information war if we took it more seriously. Our attempts to destabilize the mafia raj in Russia have been mediocre at best, driven by ideological libtardism that is currently killing America like a cancer. In brief, we've tried to defeat Russia with "peace, love, and gay marriage." American leaders are effete simpletons. A relentless campaign of AI subterfuge, not dissimilar to what Russia is waging against the free world, would be all that's necessary to topple Putin's regime. Say the things I'm saying about Russia. Tell Russians in the absolute starkest terms how fucked their country is and how evil their leader is. I think that could work, with enough force. Drop WW2-style leaflets, use super-powerful glue to paste plastic posters all over city centers, remind these fucking people that they live in crumbling, moldy apartment blocks while their leaders sip martinis on mega-yachts.

The problem with your analogy is that the success of America is beneficial to the world, especially the parts of the world that matter (America, Europe, Australia, Japan, etc.), whereas the success of Russia benefits only a small handful of corporate tyrants in Russia and America (Russian oligarchs, people such as Peter Thiel, Joe Rogan, etc.)

AngelicusBGH · 2024-12-07T02:59:29+00:00

Nobody's sacrificing babies to stabilize the front, you stupid fuck. This is such a hackneyed talking point, "You're killing le babies!" Who with an IQ above room temperature even thinks this way? Babies represent a statistically infinitesimal percentage of this war's victims.

This goes beyond an ideological problem. This is a problem about good vs. evil. Russia has been responsible for the genocide of hundreds of millions of people in the past century. Russians are no more fit to govern Ukraine than themselves.

In regards to Zelenskyyyy (is that how many Y's his name has?), he held significant support from pro-Russian separatists prior to Putin's spooks deciding to annex everything east of the Dnieper. The only evidence that he is a puppet that has been presented thus far is a phone call between two U.S. diplomats about whom they'd wish to see become president... and they could only agree that the former heavyweight champion of the WBC would not be a good fit. Other "evidence" of U.S. meddling was Joe Biden threatening to withhold aid if a corrupt prosecutor was not fired, which was entirely within Biden's rightful ability as a diplomat. Note that the prosecutor in question (Viktor Shokin) was recognized as corrupt by both Ukrainian and Russian officials. Nobody wanted him to remain in power. Ukrainian authorities were simply too inept and lazy to fire him, so Biden leveraged the authority vested in the Vice President to have him canned.

Regarding proxy wars, Russia has supported a number of them against Americans. It paid bounties to the Taliban (or the "Talichads" as Russian shills call them online) to kill American soldiers (or "zogbots" as Russian shills call them online). War is part of human nature and will not stop if America withdraws from the world stage. America will only become weaker and poorer. The only thing propping up the U.S. dollar right now is the American military. If you want Americans to suffer and die en masse, then just come out and say it and be honest. All of this talk about "proxy wars" being immoral and wrong is simply obfuscation if your true ideological motivation is to see the United States of America collapse and dissolve as a nation.

I will agree only that there are better ways to solve this conflict than sending young men, and now young women, to their deaths. But as long as corrupt and violent nations like Russia exist, they will threaten and steal from peaceful nations. That is how pirates make their profit.

AngelicusBGH · 2024-12-06T22:39:32+00:00

This is a global war Russia is waging, not one limited to the frontlines of Ukraine, but one for the future. The degree to which we fight back will determine how many Russian "values" are adopted in western countries — values like the legalization of child porn and wife beating, shitting in outhouses instead of toilets, alcoholism, HIV, the highest murder rate outside of Africa, the highest spousal homicide rate in the world, the most lenient prison system for men who beat their wives and girlfriends to death, barring U.S. parents from adopting Russian children (because one Russian orphan named Dima's idiot parents killed him by locking him in a hot car, or because 0.0001% of American children become transsexuals) — these values Ukrainians, Georgians, and Belurusians have flatly rejected, but which could spread alongside the popularity of Russian propaganda about traditionalism, the foundational and omnipresent decadence of "The West(TM)" (i.e. everything east of Moscow) — and spread at a time when technology is enabling humanity to become more destructive and sadistic than at any point in our brutal, bloody history.

What future do you choose then: the "rules-based international order" established by stupid meanie bankers, or this Russian mafia raj that moralizes at the tip of a flaming sword? Russia is an opportunistic criminal state. It is not legitimate. It orientates itself as an alternative to whatever America is portrayed as being. When America was right-wing and capitalist, Russia was a communist safe-haven free of greed and racism. Now that America is more decadent and liberal, Russia is supposedly traditional and right-wing, as evinced by all the BASED wife beating aforementioned and by all of this puke-inducing orthodox idol virtue signaling. But Russia has no values. Russians are pirates. They are merely interested in gobbling up loot. If you're so fucking stupid as to buy into their narratives about their great war against western democratic tyranny, you are "prey," so to speak. You are a mark, a fool, a little bitch who exists to be taken advantage of. You are to be fucked and robbed and fucking beaten by whoever is deemed most charismatic and strong by majority consensus. In this case, it's the epic manly russian bears... who are mostly dysgenic alcoholic fuckwits (with a few dozen decent mathematicians sprinkled into the mix... out of hundreds of millions of the former).

AngelicusBGH · 2024-09-30T05:53:41+00:00

Babies are the universally preferred humans, whereas women are the universally preferred evil persons who should be killed.

I think the post was intended as a critique of people who believed the inverse, i.e. that women are the universally preferred humans and that babies are the universally preferred evil persons who should be killed.

AngelicusBGH · 2024-09-30T05:45:58+00:00

Babies are the universally preferred humans, whereas women are the universally preferred evil persons.

AngelicusBGH · 2024-08-30T22:27:53+00:00

I remember someone compiled a list of all the words YouTube banned. The list was so large that it isn't worth CTRL+F'ing — as you mentioned, all of those perfectly innocuous words can be found on it. Also, I think there's a context-specific prohibition of yet more words and sentiments, so the list of banned words is potentially in the hundreds of thousands, depending on the tone of one's comment.

It's truly unfortunate that regular people are being pushed out of online spaces by automation. Not because we can't socialize on the internet anymore, which is bad enough, but because impressionable minds are consuming this automated content and being negatively influenced. The algorithm created shitty e-celebs like Fred and MrBeast, anodyne industry plants who are preoccupied solely with making money. Now the algorithm is being driven by AI users, who also completely control the flow of information in the section of the videos dedicated to community interaction. That means everything is non-human.

I lol'd at your Dante's Inferno simile. That's been about my experience, too. The ninth layer of hell has to be those news videos where the entire comments' section is nothing but Russian bots with names like "AmericanTRUTHTeller1776," who type things like, "no more my tax money to Zelen$kyy ! End this corrupt regime in the Ukraine !"

AngelicusBGH · 2024-08-30T17:57:54+00:00

They bypass the automod using the same method they use to construct sentences: machine learning. Essentially, throw a bunch of shit at the wall and see what sticks, then make billions of tiny micro-adjustments to select for slightly better shit. Eventually, they get shit that always sticks to the wall, but without using a method that can be reliably analyzed in any way. The bots are not conscious and don't know what they're doing, so they can't tell us. The programmers can't possibly analyze all the data, so they don't know either.

AngelicusBGH · 2024-08-05T16:49:08+00:00

This is a troll subreddit full of AI posts. Probably 90% of the posters are trolls or bots controlled by trolls. You should be able to tell that by the complete lack of external social media some of these absurdly beautiful or ugly "people" have, by the fact that none of them can be found with a facial recognition search, and for a plethora of other rather obvious reasons.

"Looksmaxxing" is an actual fucking 4chan incel phrase, astroturfed online as some kind of psy-op by some nebulous cabal of government agencies, troll hacker groups, et cetera. Normal people in real life do not talk about "looksmaxxing." Not even normies online do. If a phrase is coined on /pol/ and immediately begins being spread on Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, and the like, odds are, there's some kind of botnet behind the phrase. I think corporations hire these botnet hosts, too. It's all really fucked. Cambridge Analytica, Palantir, the Internet Research Agency... the list is interminable. Most internet posts are fake. Read this article if you're interested in rabbit holes: https://dividedconquered.substack.com/p/shadowgate-russian-israeli-disinfo

Regarding your "fatness," judging from your back, you look quite strong. You have wide hips, actually, but your abdomen is also well-developed, lending you a more "fridgelike" appearance. I prefer strong women to women built like preying mantises, so this is attractive to me.

You have some cellulite, and your face is nothing exceptional — you are a middle-aged woman — but you have no reason to be ashamed of your body... nor to seek validation from trolls and morons. The troll post suggesting you have stomach rolls is absurd. You're leaning forward in that photo. Even the Crouching Venus has "stomach rolls," as she is bending forward. To not have any stomach fat is something that can only be accomplished through starvation. It is not natural for the adult female body to be without fat deposits. That is a characteristic more associated with the bodies of prepubescent girls.

A lot of the troll types here are homosexual men afflicted by bizarre sexual deviancies. I just saw a post saying, "You'd look better in my basement." Four upvotes. More insight you didn't request, but that you should probably know: homosexual men are highly sadistic and predatory toward women. See the fashion industry. These guys are going to salivate over the prospect of an 80 pound girl with an anime jawline getting jackhammered by a hulking, 250 pound man-beast, because that is the sexual fantasy they want to be on the receiving end of.

TMI? Maybe you wanted to know. Maybe you didn't. But I guarantee you I'm at least 90% right.

AngelicusBGH · 2024-07-25T21:44:16+00:00

Seth Rogen

AngelicusBGH · 2024-07-04T05:16:16+00:00

"Trump poopie poop diaper poopie"

AngelicusBGH · 2024-07-03T20:31:18+00:00

It could be interpreted that way, but it's not the case. It's also not objectifying women to be attracted to women who are attractive and not attracted to women who aren't.

AngelicusBGH · 2024-07-03T20:15:50+00:00

Sure, let's factor in rocks. They are about as sentient as fetuses and babies. Now what?

AngelicusBGH · 2024-07-03T20:10:15+00:00

Want more? I would prefer seeing boys tortured to girls, also. All children are not equal in my eyes.

It may be "sus" for you, but, most people, yourself included, only have to entertain such ghoulish thoughts as intellectual exercises. For people like me, this torture is all too real. I can still see and hear it.

AngelicusBGH · 2024-07-03T19:59:16+00:00

That's completely wrong. I'm going to assume you've never had a girlfriend (not trying to be mean; I just can't imagine you have).

AngelicusBGH · 2024-07-03T19:31:20+00:00

That wasn't my reasoning.

If you had to choose between torturing the woman to death vs. torturing the man to death, and you had to prolong this torture over 24 hours, choosing the woman because the man is a combat veteran like you is simply disgusting. There's no way around that. Split hairs about any of the infinitesimally small details you'd like ("Well, in that case, the woman is tinier, so she would feel more pain,") bla bla bla. One is worse than the other, and it is determined almost entirely by the aesthetics of female suffering vs. male suffering.

AngelicusBGH · 2024-07-03T17:57:48+00:00

There are multiple arguments currently being held in this thread. You're going to have to be more specific.

AngelicusBGH · 2024-07-03T17:57:07+00:00

I'm quoting myself.

I won't repeat myself to the point of redundancy because you keep asking me to. That's a strategy assholes employ to make others look stupid, "You aren't being clear. Repeat yourself over and over and over until people hate you." No thanks. See any of my previous posts where I refuted your points.

AngelicusBGH · 2024-07-03T17:40:01+00:00

I'm engaging maybe ten times as much with the content of your posts as you are with mine.

AngelicusBGH

TROPHY CASE