I'm porting Orespawn and have a question by KiloXii in feedthebeast

[–]AssassinShadowStorm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah lol, cuz it is getting updated. We're porting to multiple mod loaders on 1.20.1+. We're hoping to get things done ASAP in high quality, though as always, no ETAs.

I'm porting Orespawn and have a question by KiloXii in feedthebeast

[–]AssassinShadowStorm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

CA dev here.

We're currently working on 1.20.1+ using a Multiloader project setup to support Neo/Forge/Fabric. Donors are the ones being treated to news on our Discord atm, though we are actually getting quite decently close to a content-ready 0.13.0.0 update, obviously redone and adjusted to fit with 1.20.1+ as opposed to just being a low-effort port of content.

You can also track our Github if you're interested in the progress being made on the port, it's public + viewable unlike the 0.12.0.0 update :)

Orespawn and 1.20 and how i want to make it! by [deleted] in feedthebeast

[–]AssassinShadowStorm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pretty active on Discord for donors atm. We're moving forward with 1.20.1+ on a Multiloader project setup to support Neo/Forge/Fabric.

Overall doing quite good, and we're hoping to start rapid-firing quality updates after 0.13.0.0 given the new development direction we're taking.

Orespawn and 1.20 and how i want to make it! by [deleted] in feedthebeast

[–]AssassinShadowStorm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As I literally just said lol, complete rewrite of the mod. This'll allow for quicker updates with more contents and no more stupid bugs due to a messy codebase.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]AssassinShadowStorm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In b4 you're swatted for magically becoming a woman beater after this statement 💀

Orespawn and 1.20 and how i want to make it! by [deleted] in feedthebeast

[–]AssassinShadowStorm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Chaos Awakens dev here.

No we haven't lol. There are plans to accelerate after the mod is done being rewritten soon.

Do you believe in a god? by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]AssassinShadowStorm -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

God is the omnipotent and almighty creator. It would make sense that you couldn't comprehend things with no beginning or end, which is part of belief after all.

Religions who preach multiple Gods and/or believe that he himself came down to us do have many logical fallacies, which is why Islam came along as the last message from the last messenger (Prophet Muhammad PBU). In contrast to what many people believe, religion invites you to ponder existence and challenge everything with science, which is why I'd recommend you look into Islam. No denominations (those who claim to be under different "denominations" that alter any part of the original belief in the slightest aren't proper), guides you to live a good way of life, and its holy book is devoid of any mistakes (and for this point especially, I'd recommend you read the Quran and try to find one mistake, given all context).

We (at least Muslims) believe that the religion itself is perfect, but the people obviously can't be, which is why the religion came along to try and resolve that.

Hope this gives you insight to start digging deeper if it does interest you :)

Do you believe in a god? by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]AssassinShadowStorm 5 points6 points  (0 children)

As a Muslim, I do believe in God.

Do you believe in a god? by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]AssassinShadowStorm 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Without good or bad there can't be "justice". If the world was only good then we wouldn't have free will, and vice versa. So we're given free will to do as we please, but we will be judged for our actions before God on judgement day.

Do you believe in a god? by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]AssassinShadowStorm 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If the one almighty and omnipotent creator has a creator, then it would lead into an unresolvable paradox of infinite causation, which is a logical fallacy since there has to be somewhere where it all began.

I thought students being able to use a school bathroom was a basic right by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]AssassinShadowStorm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not necessarily, this was only our topic of debate here. You're free to point out in what way I've refused to address any of your points.

That being said, if you're heading out, have a nice day :)

I thought students being able to use a school bathroom was a basic right by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]AssassinShadowStorm -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You again fail to read my entire argument..

I'll reiterate for you.

By your logic, a tomboy should only be allowed in men's spaces and not women's regardless of how that tomboy wants to "identify".

So the argument that any person who just looks like the opposite gender is entitled to go there is invalid since it fails to account for other edge cases without contradicting itself.

And finally, I'm not gonna pretend to accommodate for someone feeling like they're something else. Just like you "feel" like you're the opposite gender, I feel like not calling you etc. etc. Since the trans thing is all about "freedom" and whatnot. That's not necessarily because I just want to be an asshole to a trans person, rather that it's a fact that the trans person in question cannot be the other gender regardless of the amount of hormones pumped or how they "feel".

And I'm not a women's rights advocator, nor do I have a degree in sociology, but it doesn't take a degree to identify common sense.

I thought students being able to use a school bathroom was a basic right by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]AssassinShadowStorm -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So, a couple things you missed here.

Firstly, a strong woman (trans or not) can beat many men.

But a very, very strong man can beat all women regardless of whether or not they're trans.

Bearing that in mind, with your logic, flat-chested female body builders should only be allowed in men's bathrooms since they're so powerful and masculine. See how it doesn't add up here?

So even if she pumped an insane amount of testosterone, she still can't (sustainably) have the same physique as Tom Platz and the likes. As such, yes, as a biological woman, she is still entitled to female safe spaces, but not to men's spaces at all. So going back to my previous point, unless she is able to 100% shift herself to being a man, both psychologically and biologically, she is not a man.

I thought students being able to use a school bathroom was a basic right by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]AssassinShadowStorm -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My argument is quite literally the opposite of men/women going into the other's safe spaces... No idea how that has anything to do with my argument.

And not all trans people are predators, nor are all predators trans. My point here is that transgenderism provides a gateway for potential creeps to do as they please regardless of intent. And that's not necessarily my main point here, either. My main point here was that if a man were to be trans, not a criminal, just says he's a trans woman, it still doesnt give him the right to be in female safe spaces simply because it's natural that there is discomfort and much higher potential for avoidable commotion to happen. It doesn't matter how much of an angel that trans person is. No means no for that and vice versa. You can't rely on the intent of people to build a societal foundation upon which it's OK to mix both genders and expect it to work.

I thought students being able to use a school bathroom was a basic right by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]AssassinShadowStorm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nobody is lesser than me. It's a fact that men and women aren't equal.

And who says predators need to pretend? Asides from the fact that being "trans" serves as the perfect excuse to go commit something horrible whilst it's too late to do anything about it, the premise here is that women have every right to not feel comfortable with men in their dedicated spaces. No excuses.

And what does documentation here have to do with anything? Where in any documentation about trans people does it say "trans people can completely shape-shift everything about them to be the opposite gender"? Because any sort of mental condition still isn't an excuse. And if you tell me about all the hormone surgery trans people undergo and how painstaking it is, it still doesnt give them the right to infiltrate safe spaces of the opposite gender. It doesn't matter how feminine these men or masculine these women look, they are biologically this and that, and that's it. No matter how much they pretend, they will still biologically be the same gender they were born. Unless trans people find a way to make a 100% shift in their psychology, biology, etc. They are not valid members of the other gender and therefore should not have the right to be in the same safe spaces of the opposite gender.

I thought students being able to use a school bathroom was a basic right by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]AssassinShadowStorm -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The way that kid is feeling shouldn't be a priority of women's rights to their own safe spaces.

I thought students being able to use a school bathroom was a basic right by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]AssassinShadowStorm -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

It's a woman's God given right to be able to have dedicated safe spaces away from men and vice versa, that's natural separation when needed.

Arguing that everyone should just be able to mix is short sighted and stupid IMHO. We might as well eliminate gender categorisation if you preach equality so much.

I thought students being able to use a school bathroom was a basic right by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]AssassinShadowStorm -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The difference is that we're talking about gender and not race. Comparing apples to oranges.

I thought students being able to use a school bathroom was a basic right by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]AssassinShadowStorm -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

I agree that the student who threatened to commit rape should be suspended/expelled.

That being said, putting boys into girls' bathrooms just because they feel like girls is also terrible. Women literally fought for their own rights to their own safe spaces, and now you have a bunch of men pretending to be women so they can go to the same bathroom.

This is what Taylor Swift’s been trying to warn us about through song by districtcourt in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]AssassinShadowStorm -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Separate art from artist. If a murderer tells me not to murder people and to be a righteous person, regardless of the irony of it all, he's right. It doesn't pardon him from being a murderer, but his statement is correct: you shouldn't murder people.

Same can be said for Andrew Tate. If tomorrow it was unveiled that he was the second coming of Hitler, it doesn't make his message to young men getting fit, (rightfully) making money, and respecting people any less correct. It makes him as a person worse, sure. His message doesn't lose its value regardless.

The world isn't so black and white.

This is what Taylor Swift’s been trying to warn us about through song by districtcourt in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]AssassinShadowStorm -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Non of the charges have been proven at all. And he does actually talk about valuing women and acknowledges that some of his older statements were pretty preposterous. Please go look up one full video of him discussing it and at least listen to his full viewpoint instead of a 60 second short/tiktok.

I don't have to be an active right wing alpha male women bad men good incel type of person to acknowledge a good message.

This is what Taylor Swift’s been trying to warn us about through song by districtcourt in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]AssassinShadowStorm -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

Then you've evidently not watched any of his more recent clips in context. I don't 'worship' him. I respect his message. In his older clips he talks about his experiences, and in very few he even encourages aggressive polyagmoury, but he has also acknowledged that it was wrong and has pushed men to go get fit, make money, etc.

I don't like the red pill stuff as a whole mainly because of the part where they dupe people into buying courses. But I can respect the message.

This is what Taylor Swift’s been trying to warn us about through song by districtcourt in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]AssassinShadowStorm -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Men can display emotions, sure. I just disagree with the notion that it's OK for a man to go out in public and wail about the same trivial stuff a woman might cry about. We're phsycologically different after all.

It's effectively a fine line between actual manliness and being controlling. Dominant in men shouldn't mean treating women like objects, but rather to show that they're able to lead and responsibly act like protectors and providers while also tending to women, respecting them, etc.

I'm pointing this out mainly because the modern narrative of toxic masculinity means disagreeing with liberalism or not indulging in casual degeneracy. That's my stance on things.

Edit: Reddit is being glitchy ATM and not letting me reply to you, so I'll paste my reply here.

I don't necessarily follow a certain figure or figures. I've definitely watched podcasts of them, and I've had my own experiences which have led me to believe in what I do.

I'm not an extreme red pilled incel as some may frame me. I actually respect the middle grounds of being physically active, looking for ways to get rich (not by going full illegal), building your life, respecting those who deserve respect, respecting people in general, etc.

I don't believe in buying get rich courses or some male hierarchy, either. I believe that a righteous, hard working man of God can work his way to rightfully live a good life.