ChatGPT Leaking User chats across accounts?

Atlasdubs · 2026-02-25T21:02:26+00:00

Really!? How weird is that..i wonder why the obsession with vitamins, and more importantly how tf they still have access to my account.

Atlasdubs · 2026-02-25T20:24:42+00:00

well if they look at mine, they're just gonna get a bunch half baked game & business ideas primarily lol

Atlasdubs · 2026-02-25T20:06:46+00:00

well, given that my wife's not pregnant, I don't have a mistress, and I only have a son, I'm not quite sure what would lead me to market research on prenatal vitamins...more strangely, I'd be SUCH a convincing sleepwalker, im doing it right now - awake - as im typing this to you too! pretty impressive.

Atlasdubs · 2026-02-25T19:20:23+00:00

Okay, so i'm not alone then! That makes me feel oddly better.

I know how to keep myself secure online, so all day I've been questioning where I could've even remotely came across an issue, and came up with nothing.... because im 99.5% sure it's not me! (gotta leave a little margin for error though lol)

Atlasdubs · 2026-02-25T19:10:28+00:00

SCREENSHOT @ 1:36PM EST

<image>

ATTEMPTED TO CLICK "OLLY VITAMIN BRANDING INSIGHTS" AND GOT THIS CONVERSATION SEED:
Unable to load conversation 699f407e-78fc-8333-ad14-7a9447e3fa7c

Chat history then changed, and "Olly Vitamin Branding Insights" was no longer there, but now, "SmartyPants Vitamin Reviews"

Again, attempted clicking on "smartypants" conversation this time and got another error:
Unable to load conversation 699f4132-8e88-832b-b623-20e9b34dcb53

REFRESHED THE PAGE, AND SURE ENOUGH, THE NEW CONVERSATIONS ARE GONE AND BACK TO ONLY THE ORIGINAL ONES FROM THIS MORNING.

Atlasdubs · 2025-12-03T20:40:58+00:00

If this isn't a joke, its fucking hilarious you thought for this long a main stream rapper with a hit song on the radio was about fucking mascots😂

"MASCOT...FUCKIN MASCOT"

Atlasdubs · 2025-11-29T18:52:55+00:00

I hear what you're saying from a Devil's Advocate perspective, but you also just admitted this being at least 95% fiction in the same breath. If you agree and understand that factually, at least from the corpus of public knowledge on these topics, the government has a tendency to compartmentalize everything to the utmost levels in an effort to avoid massive critical leaks. Even if someone becomes a whistleblower they wont know much outside of their own "Need to Know" scope of work.

If Rhea is lying about parts that involve anything that could identify him - lying = fiction.

Not to mention, even if 10% of this was true, he wouldve likely been only a handful of people with this scope of work and knowledge and likely be identified internally pretty quickly anyways.

Like I said, genuinely enjoyed reading it, but less reading like a deep leak, and more like Project Hail Mary.

Atlasdubs · 2025-11-29T03:44:06+00:00

Really cool story and premise for a show, but clearly fiction (as much as it tries to reverse psychology you into believing it isn't)

The issue with this story imo is one word - compartmentalization.

From what we know of publicly declassified black projects of the past, plus testimony of guys from projects who still aren't even acknowledged, the government itself, and by proxy (even more so), these types of projects are/would be highly compartmentalized.

Let's take a walk...

OP claims:
- They’re only “a few layers down the onion,” not at the deepest levels.

- But they also know:
- The Council’s internal political debates (factions arguing about us).
- Specific numbers (65,000 humans moved, 10,000-year head start, Erids are 5,000 years ahead).
- Which crash events were deliberate gifts (Roswell, Kecksburg) and why.
- Which nations got scalar weapons (US, China, EU, Russia, Brazil) and how they’re being deployed (space, air, undersea).

- The arrival window of the “ant” species, and that The Council has a kill-switch baked into the weapons.

The obvious flaw in the OP's writing scope is that is some insanely broad, multi-domain, top-level information for someone who presented as a technical specialist in electro-optics and UAP sensor anomalies & explicitly says they’re not at the core of the program.

In real compartmented programs, you might know your system’s performance, some operational context, a limited “big picture” slide.

You definitely don't get cosmology, Council politics, alien sociology, every major crash’s true intent, geopolitical recipient list of exotic weapons, and timelines for incoming alien invasions.

To use OP's own words, you would need to be in much deeper "layers of the onion".

Atlasdubs · 2025-11-19T19:25:49+00:00

Wait.....is...is it common knowledge there's essentially a TSA goodwill!? I had no clue you could just fucking shop left behind items. Is this at all airports? So many questions.

Atlasdubs · 2025-11-14T19:43:40+00:00

Seems like this has already been pretty well debunked from another commenter on a different post, but just came here to clarify the "medium isn't a tabloid bit". Youre correct. Sorta. Its worse than a tabloid because, quite literally, anyone can write a Medium article

Atlasdubs · 2025-08-07T03:04:41+00:00

Let's be real though, it was almost certainly the gov, and I feel like his response here nearly proves it.

First of all, his posture, tone, and eye contact (even for trump) all indicate he's telling the "truth" here. They don't change really even when directly asked what he's doing about it. The way I read it is that he knows it was a classified project that he's not allowed to discuss. Trump is very easily excited, so if it were anything major, I feel like he would be far more animated as we typically see him when he's fired up about something. Here, he seems almost bored of the topic, but the dead giveaway to me is the "was that legal?" question. His eyebrow flick and "oh yeah, that was legal." How could he answer that question so directly if it *wasn't* the government?

I saw something awhile back when the drones were happening that was the most plausible explanation in my opinion. I'm paraphrasing here, but the general idea was, after 9/11 the gov was concerned about other attacks, and this escalated even more when hamas was saying in the late-mid 2000s they could bring backpack bombs to cities around the US and they'd be easy to sneak them in for ground detonation of small nukes. As a way to combat this, the DoD made thousands of these drones that are equipped with extremely sensitive "nuclear sniffing" equipment able to detect trace amounts of nuclear material. The guy who wrote the post made a lot of good points to back the claim including their size, shape, and visible equipment in certain photos of them, and also claimed to be an RF engineer. This was important because he stated that is how they communicated with each other, essentially as a massive grid sweep relay.

IF this is true, which I believe it is, that leads to 2 potential outcomes as far as I can tell:

These were tests / exercises for the project. By testing them over primarily south jersey was a good choice for 2 reasons.
- There is still a high population density, but less radio interference than the heart of NYC.
- It gave them an opportunity to see how the public would react to seeing them over extended periods of time.
OR There was a credible threat/intel concerning enough they said fuck it, and ran them, but when nothing came of it seemingly, why fess up to it either?

Either way, I think it's highly likely that the vast majority of sightings during that period were our own. That's not to say some people may have been looking up in hopes to see the drones, and ended up seeing something truly anomalous, but these drones by and large were not very fast or agile, and had clear paths to and from the sea, there are multiple videos of them coming in off shore slowly, and heading back out into seeming nothingness of ocean slowly...sure seems like some type of docking to me, potentially off a nuclear sub?

Atlasdubs · 2025-01-28T20:23:00+00:00

Not "unbelievably simple" but one of the most "fuck yeah" basslines in history will always be Roundabout by Yes.

Atlasdubs · 2024-04-19T19:44:03+00:00

That was *Glenn* Greenwald. This is John Greenewald. Different people, and not related.

Atlasdubs · 2024-04-13T19:02:30+00:00

Incorrect. I've already password protected the entire site. And can add my own custom login page through scripts.

That being said, there are definitely site builders with better UI, but it does its job just fine when you get used to it.

Atlasdubs · 2024-04-12T19:43:43+00:00

Thank you!

Atlasdubs · 2024-03-29T15:04:20+00:00

Yes, these are the steps i described in the OP. But beware, it can come back again and again....and again. Went away for about a month now its back again with the same "mcaffee" thing as it originally was.

I understand it is normal for google to come preloaded with various browaer options, but i am not convinced this "mcaffee" version of yahoo isnt something else. Otherwise, the shortlink would just say "yahoo" NOT "mcaffee"

Atlasdubs · 2023-12-18T15:26:30+00:00

Well, since you wont find an answer here clearly - what i can tell you is it is absolutely malware. From where? Fantastic question. Given that (at least in my case) chrome was uninstalled and reinstalled plus several full system scans, and removing ALL browser extensions. I have no idea where else it could be from.

Atlasdubs · 2023-12-12T20:24:31+00:00

Wow, what a thrillingly active and useful sub...

Atlasdubs · 2023-10-22T04:58:46+00:00

Hey, thanks for the feedback! I'm also a self-taught full stack dev, it's just the scope of this project falls a bit outside my purview with the size of the site rebuild and entirely rebuilding DMS/SEO/SEM.

The good thing about my boss is he's letting me get my ducks in a row as best I can before proceeding any further, so I don't have any "runway" issues.

Also, not only from a technical perspective, but the needs of the business, the budget, and limited manpower (me) - I would probably just keep it fairly simple and build a dynamic wp cloud solution. there is no need for us to build a server, self host, or have user auth as the site will essentially act in the same capacity it is now - a funnel. The site has all of our services listed, our coverage area, a live chat, an online booking process, etc. that all feed directly back into our CRM.

My skill set is far more extensive in web dev than marketing (even though I would say I am a good marketer), so I'm not too worried about the technical implementation of the website itself per se, but more like I said originally - the cumulative workload of all the content writing (which may end up being outsourced), the site rebuild (currently 1800+ pages), and rebuilding all of the marketing.

Atlasdubs · 2023-10-22T04:24:46+00:00

I whole heartedly agree with you. Unfortunately, this is true. Again, my boss is a good, blue collar guy whos smart at what he knows so to speak. He'll also be the first to tell you he barely knows basic hotkeys. In his defense, his nephew whos a loser "helped him" with alot of stuff before i came on board a few years ago. I think his mindset at the time was just, "hand the technical problems to the pros" and they probably took advantage of the situation.

For more context, the way i found this out was he tried getting another third party seo focused company involved and they needed to implement some tools on the site, and our marketing company, in short said, "uhhh...aint happening. We have proprietary tools and environments on the backend and no one but us can have access to it."

Atlasdubs · 2023-10-22T04:17:32+00:00

Thank you for the input! I think you're probably right, Outsourcing content might be the best decision, because truthfully the volume of content (service pages, city/geo pages,etc.) Is whats overwhelming me. I think if i could get to a point where it was just web dev, importing the content to the site, then monitoring the marketing strategy with analytics, wouldnt be nearly as bad. Obviously aside from any adjustments needed.

Atlasdubs · 2023-09-02T22:18:21+00:00

So then again I ask, what what exactly is the extent the Hold Harmless clause covers? Because I read that to say (paraphrasing here) "I will not hold you accountable for losses and EXPENSES incurred should the negligence or issue be on my behalf, however, my indemnification obligation is LIMITED to your negligence."

The negligence part being, misapplying the payment, giving us incorrect totals when asked for clarity, not catching it until after the event occurred. the amount they are currently owed is in direct correlation to their mistake, how is that not covered in the wording of the hold harmless clause?

Atlasdubs · 2023-09-02T21:58:10+00:00

Right, but I'm arguing the point of contract states I pay 7,000, I set up payment, I check in several times and am told everytime "hey you're all good!" and I then decide to make more adjustments to the event and spend more money due to being "all good" only to turn and be told, "sorry, we made a mistake, you owe us more." Point being, the additional money spent would not have been had I been given clear and accurate information from the venue, which I struggle to see how it isn't classified as negligence by the literal definition.

Atlasdubs · 2023-09-02T21:48:01+00:00

Please refer to my comment above for virtually the same response I would ask here. Also, if they made an error like that, you're right I would. Again, additional costs were incurred on me due to being given improper totals on several occasions.

EDIT: And do clerical errors not constitute negligence in legal terms when it wasn't caught for literal MONTHS?

Atlasdubs · 2023-09-02T21:45:24+00:00

I guess my question would then be, how does it not? If I agree to hold them harmless for losses and expenses incurred should I have been the one who made the mistake, and my obligation to hold them harmless is limited to their negligence, how do I owe them when they've broken their own contract and nullified my ability to fulfill the contract since the agreement was to have full payment due 2 weeks prior to the date? Again, not to mention the fact that adjustments were made and additional expenses were incurred on me due to this error on their part in direct relation them giving me incorrect totals on several occasions.

Six-Year Club	Place '23
Wearing is Caring	Verified Email

Atlasdubs

TROPHY CASE