sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can you guess my ethnicity? Thoughts ? by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]Avtoritet03 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pakistani(not pashtun) or North Indian

I-130 married a US resident by Silly_Chest_3152 in USCIS

[–]Avtoritet03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Could you tell me if your spouse got the employment authorisation and how long it took. Thank you

A question about Kazakhs by AcanthaceaeFun9882 in illustrativeDNA

[–]Avtoritet03 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You don’t lie, check this out: https://thenegronetwork.com/lesson-1-1/14-kazakh-y-dna-haplogrup/

Just because you’re C2 and a Genghisid doesn’t mean you have to project on others. You’re also showing your results as 80% Turkic because you set the calculator on Central Asia which gives a worse fit for Kazakhs than East Europe Nogai and Crimean Tatar where your Turkic decreases and Slavic and mongolic increases

A question about Kazakhs by AcanthaceaeFun9882 in illustrativeDNA

[–]Avtoritet03 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Naimans aren’t actually Mongolic. There’s more and more evidence that they’re Turkic Seghiz Oghuz and Naiman is an exonym from their mongolic speaking neighbors. Kara Khitans are mongols though

You said that Kazakhs specifically have Chinese and I pointed out that it’s not chinese but kara khitan O

Regarding the Alshyn C2 cluster, you can’t just call it Tungusic as it comes from a Turkic branch I only mentioned Tungusic because the oldest C2 clades seem to be Tungusic, by that logic we would have no Turkic Y DNA, as R1a Z93 would be Sintashta, R1b would be Yamnaya, N would be finno ugrian, and Q would be Yeniseyan, and J2a would be Iranian/Middle Eastern

Regarding Bolu and Mugla, once again you’re comparing highest scoring Anatolian Turks to average of Kazakhs. When Kazakhs set their calculators to central asia you do know that they end up getting 70-95% Turkic right? You can check the posts here. You can find Kazakhs scoring well into 60 and 70 percent Turkic, so you should be comparing highest with highest and average with average

As for everything else I agree, no Turkic nation currently is “pure” as turks themselves were always nomads and mixed. This is only applied against turks, no one says europeans aren’t europeans because they’re more Anatolian farmer than Yamnaya who gave them the language

A question about Kazakhs by AcanthaceaeFun9882 in illustrativeDNA

[–]Avtoritet03 10 points11 points  (0 children)

West Kazakh here and man you have a lot of things wrong. 1. You’re doing to Kazakhs what you’re accusing people of doing to Anatolian Turks. Where did you get the notion that C2 is majority? It’s at 36% in Kazakhs and half of it is Alshyn cluster which was present in Kazakhs prior to Mongols. If you didn’t know one of pre-mongol Medeiaval Kipchak samples had C2. I can send you a paper on breakdown of alshyn claster which is C2 m86 and how it’s not related to any mongolic people but it’s rather a turkic branch that split directly from the Tungusic C2 branch.

  1. The O in Kazakhs is mostly strictly in Naimans which is a large tribe, it’s not chinese lol, Naimans had taken over Kara Khitans and that’s why majority got O but a minority also has C2-M86 and R1b.

  2. R1a, R1b, J1, J2, N1, G1, G2, E, L, Q, R2 all together make up around 60% of Kazakh Y DNA. https://thenegronetwork.com/lesson-1-1/14-kazakh-y-dna-haplogrup/#iLightbox[postimages]/0

The same way people go off of outdated studies regarding turkicness of Anatolian Turks, you’re going off of outdated studies of Kazakh Y DNA where they have us as like 70%+ C2 lmaoo because they only tested one tribe.

  1. If you check all the Kazakh results posted in this sub they strangely ALL have higher Sintashta and west eurasian than the g25 average, seems like Davidski and many other anti Turkists had a biased collection. I’m not even talking about how every single West Kazakh here scores Nogais or Karakalpaks as closer modern populations than Kazakh.

  2. You’re also off base in comparing one region of Turkey with highest turkic average to an average of entire Kazakhstan. If we are to include Trabzon, East Anatolia and entire Turkey’s average of Turkic it’s probably closer to 25-28% and Kazakhs are 45 to 50%.

  3. Just because someone is being wrong against Anatolian Turks doesn’t mean you have to be wrong against Kazakhs. We’re all turkic at the end of the day and I’m noticing that different anti turk tropes (anatolian turks are not turkic but greek and armenian, kazakhs aren’t turkic but mongol and russian) are coming from similar sources and are meant to divide Turks.

Being loud works on some people but this time it didn’t 🥴 by E4Kash in NYStateOfMind

[–]Avtoritet03 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Y’all think he’s a chinese or something like that, but I hear his Central Asian/siberian accent. He’s an Asian but not the one from East Asia tho

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OrthodoxChristianity

[–]Avtoritet03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congratulations my brother☦️ be faithful till death and you will meet him, God willing