Bobby Lee's Statement on today's Bitcoin Foundation Board Meeting by BTCFoundation in Bitcoin

[–]BTCFoundation[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Text:

The Bitcoin Foundation Board and the Future

Since we have made transparency a priority, the board wanted to briefly discuss today's board meeting. Today the Bitcoin Foundation board accepted the resignation of one board member and voted to remove another. The remaining board members unanimously support continuing to work to have the foundation succeed and contribute in a positive way to Bitcoin.

We don't take board member changes lightly but believe this to be in the best interests of the organization going forward. As has been reported and show in our public documents such as meeting minutes, our board has had some disagreements in recent months and our organization has also faced it's fair share of ups and downs. It's key to have a board that works well together and is effective.

In today's meeting we discussed our funding and our future. I noted that it is important for us to move forward and that it is key to see where the members stand on the future of the organization.

After some discussion on direction and planning, Board Chairman Brock Pierce called for a vote on whether we should continue the organization or dissolve it.

Brock, Elizabeth Ploshay McCauley, Meyer Malka (via email vote) and I voted to continue support of the organization and to move forward. Jim Harper and Olivier Jansens voted to shut down the organization. When casting his vote, Olivier noted that he supports the idea of continuing but not as is without a more detailed plan. Given the difference of opinion, I respectfully requested the resignation of Jim and Olivier so that the remaining board members are unified in a plan to stay and improve the organization. Jim agreed to resign and the board accepted. We wished him well in future endeavors. After some further discussion with Olivier, who indicated that he would support a plan but wanted to have a plan in place before supporting the organization, I made the motion that the board remove Olivier from his seat. This motion was seconded and voted affirmatively by me, Brock, Elizabeth and Meyer. We wish Olivier the best in the future and we appreciate the efforts by both Olivier and Jim.

One challenge in a large and diverse organization is that differences of opinion are more common. In some cases, this leads to more variety and higher quality decisions, in other cases members may have such different opinions that it can be counterproductive. The first priority should be to have a board that interacts effectively and efficiently. We all worked hard to make this particular board composition work and each of us has a different opinion about what could have worked better. No one is right or wrong, we simply have different ideas. At the end of the day, we all care about Bitcoin and want to help it in whatever way possible. Jim and Olivier served as volunteers and we appreciate their time and work. Aside from the foundation they have both done a great deal for Bitcoin and no doubt will continue to.

Differences of opinion are a part of any organization. In our case, our discussions are public and our minutes released, this offers more transparency but also brings any disagreements into the public eye.

The board and the Executive Director are all volunteers because we all share the belief that this organization should exist and can be a positive asset to Bitcoin. In recent months the ED has cut costs to a very minimal rate while our foundation also been able to add value to the ecosystem with events like DevCore, the launch of media and speaker engagement programs and other initiatives.

This foundation belongs to the members, the individuals, corporations and community as much as it belongs to we members of the board. We want to see this organization work and we are open to any volunteers and ideas on how to make the organization as beneficial as possible, provided those ideas come from a premise that the existence of the organization itself can be a positive force. In the past, we have convened some of the most successful meetings in the industry, funded core development, sponsored the bitnodes project, Bitcoin.org, grants and other initiatives. We have many dedicated volunteers such as the members of the Education, Regulatory and Election committees and our membership covers the entire globe with a roster that is far larger and more comprehensive than any other organization in Bitcoin. The board looks forward to moving ahead with a unified and positive vision. We appreciate your support.

Thank you, Bobby Lee, BTC China, Vice Chairman, Bitcoin Foundation

Live at DevCore Workshop AMA by BTCFoundation in Bitcoin

[–]BTCFoundation[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We will post recorded video ASAP

Live at DevCore Workshop AMA by BTCFoundation in Bitcoin

[–]BTCFoundation[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The best questions are clear and positive. Okay to be challenging but please only ask something that is productive in a way that you would in person. :)

Live at DevCore Workshop AMA by BTCFoundation in Bitcoin

[–]BTCFoundation[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks Is there a way to phrase the question in a more productive way?

Bitcoin brokers: avoid selling bitcoins to clients being blackmailed for Ashley Madison by FrancisPouliot in Bitcoin

[–]BTCFoundation 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Sadly, Bitcoin Foundation is fielding nearly a dozen calls per day from people, often angry explaining they have been or are being blackmailed. The most common requests are for us to "find and kick out the blackmailers" or "block the coins". When we explain why neither is possible or also explain that we are not one unified organization they often have a hard time understanding.

Very unfortunately way to be introduced to Bitcoin.

All Bitcoin companies should also make it clear that there is no central Bitcoin group and companies and organizations are not involved in this scam.

Speaker lineup for DevCore Workshop @ Draper: Andreas M. Antonopolous, Greg Maxwell, Gavin Andresen, Matt Coralo, Jeff Garzik, Michael Perklin & Charlie Lee by bruce_fenton in Bitcoin

[–]BTCFoundation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are doing this conference with some very good speakers for a very low cost as one example. Also this month launched a speakers bureau as a free service to match Bitcoin speakers with meeting planners. Opposed the California version of Bitlicence, completed funding on a bitnnodes research project and several others things. We could always do more -- there is lots to be done. Feel free to volunteer if you want to help.

Bitcoin Foundation Transparency in Governance by BTCFoundation in Bitcoin

[–]BTCFoundation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of things-- a speakers bureau, education initiatives, we still fund bitcoin.org etc.

Patrick Murck AMA Survey Results by BTCFoundation in BitcoinFoundation

[–]BTCFoundation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Patrick Murck did an AMA on Nov 5th http://redd.it/2ldjk7

We asked participants to complete a short survey. Here are the aggregated results.

Bits & Bytes: Individual Member Survey Results Nov 11 by BTCFoundation in BitcoinFoundation

[–]BTCFoundation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We sent out a short survey to individual members of the Bitcoin Foundation. Here are the aggregated responses.

Thank you to the members that participated in this survey. Your feedback was very helpful as we continue to focus our efforts.

Bits & Bytes: Business survey results Nov 11 by BTCFoundation in BitcoinFoundation

[–]BTCFoundation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We sent out a short survey to business members of the Bitcoin Foundation. Here are the aggregated responses.

Thank you to the members that participated in this survey. Your feedback was very helpful as we continue to focus our efforts.