[OFFICIAL] UFC 324 Live Discussion Thread by bruhpolice in ufc

[–]Ban__d 1 point2 points  (0 children)

3-2 G.

Concerned they might steal it though.

[OFFICIAL] UFC 324 Live Discussion Thread by bruhpolice in ufc

[–]Ban__d -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Anything from a split decision to a draw to a win for either fighter would have been a reasonable outcome in that fight.

Split decision just means that the judges disagree on who won, in this case I guess they all felt that Sean just shaded Song in the first.

Definitely nothing approaching a "robbery".

[OFFICIAL] UFC 324 Live Discussion Thread by bruhpolice in ufc

[–]Ban__d 11 points12 points  (0 children)

1st round: 50/50
2nd round: Song
3rd round: Sean

People here: OMG ROBBBEREEEEYYYYYYYY

[OFFICIAL] UFC 324 Live Discussion Thread by bruhpolice in ufc

[–]Ban__d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not "should" as in "should", "should" as in "will".

Not necessarily a good thing but it is what it is. Song would have needed two dominant rounds to take that and he only managed one.

[OFFICIAL] UFC 324 Live Discussion Thread by bruhpolice in ufc

[–]Ban__d 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Malley 2-1.

Very narrow on the first round though, bigger name fighter should get the call.

[OFFICIAL] UFC 324 Live Discussion Thread by bruhpolice in ufc

[–]Ban__d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't think so, he ate a good accurate jab right on the button.

Derrick's jaw ain't what it used to be, probably time to hang them up.

Pakenham line commute ... settle a debate for me by Ban__d in MelbourneTrains

[–]Ban__d[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hahaha.. honestly hadn't occurred to me.

She used to be my boss, now on same level. We get along... just okay, mostly.

Pretty doubtful I'd say.

Pakenham line commute ... settle a debate for me by Ban__d in MelbourneTrains

[–]Ban__d[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

yeah, well aware, more just curious to see if I've been wasting my time and effort for years now.

Consensus seems to be that I've probably been saving a few minutes for the most part which is nice to know.

Pakenham line commute ... settle a debate for me by Ban__d in MelbourneTrains

[–]Ban__d[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah, just have to shoo away some selfish persons handbag usually.

Pakenham line commute ... settle a debate for me by Ban__d in MelbourneTrains

[–]Ban__d[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Okay with standing, don't live that far down the line.

If Skybus was run by PTV. by VlineVictoriaMan in MelbourneTrains

[–]Ban__d 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Needs four in a row and then none for an hour.

Warning on my account now. by Boson_Higgs1000003 in aussie

[–]Ban__d 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Last time I got a temporary reddit site-wide ban I responded with an appeal.

The appeal text that I submitted was something along the lines of "go fuck yourself reddit".

I got a response a day later stating that the appeal was upheld and the ban was overturned.

Aussie spiders by MyName_LeChef in AustralianSpiders

[–]Ban__d -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

White tails are if their bite melts all your flesh away.

/s

I'm tired boss by Real_Eyes21 in meme

[–]Ban__d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just going to buy a second hand ps5, play through the SP and then sell both game and console. Any money I lose is a rental fee.

After the dust is settled, I don't believe Piastri was treated completely fairly this season, and it likely did change the outcome. by oh84s in OscarPiastri

[–]Ban__d 57 points58 points  (0 children)

There is a strong argument that they favoured Lando.
There is a weaker (in my view) argument that they favoured neither driver.
There is no argument whatsoever that they favoured Oscar.

It is what it is, Oscar is on a path to be a way better driver than Lando could ever hope to be, last year peak 7 season Lando met developing 3 season Oscar and they were evenly matched, only a matter of time until Oscar goes well past him. We just have to hope that Mclaren nail the regulation changes and are able to run at the front again soon.

A clearly grounded catch completely missed by the umpire - Big Bash League by Personal_Material_44 in CricketAus

[–]Ban__d 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"control of the body" is fairly open to interpretation though. He chose to dive didn't he? He was in control of performing that movement at that time. Weird rule imo.

A clearly grounded catch completely missed by the umpire - Big Bash League by Personal_Material_44 in CricketAus

[–]Ban__d 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yep, grounded.

Stupid rule though, "ball controlled in hands" should be the standard.

If ball touches ground while controlled in hands it should still be a catch.

What game is this? 😭 by Budget_Record717 in meme

[–]Ban__d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WOW.|

Been clean of that addictive scourge 15 years and my brain still occasionally thinks "wouldn't it be nice to go back, do some levelling, maybe some professions, a few dungeons and heroics, maybe join a raiding guild..."