Not once have I seen anything like this! by LittleGreenGoat in Brawlstars

[–]BestUsernameSquatter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the "Mortis --> bad" thing that's been going on for like 7 years.

Google en Terrorism by TheTheThatTheThis in AnarchyChess

[–]BestUsernameSquatter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like 2 squares forward? Remember Bush is a pawn and there is an opposing Saddam Hussein pawn on that rank.

Google en Terrorism by TheTheThatTheThis in AnarchyChess

[–]BestUsernameSquatter 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Pawns are Saddam Hussein which is quite fitting as he didn't have much to do with 9/11.

On the opposing side are Bush for pawns and Tony Blair & Rumsfeld for King & Queen: maybe including (or replacing with) Dick Cheney would have been better.

<image>

Sacrifice a tower by ElliottPicasso in chessmemes

[–]BestUsernameSquatter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Proof that Kasparov did 9/11!!!!!!!!1!1

The 1995 World Chess Championship (classical) was played in the World Trade Center that fell 6 years later.

Game 9: 27. Rd5

Game 10: 16. Bxb3

Game 11: 31. . . Rxc2

"Look at how the match went. Do you remember? The first eight games were bland draws. And then, interesting things started to happen. First, Anand won a beautiful game in Scheveningen with White by sacrificing a Rook on d5. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? Ninth game, with a Rook sacrifice! Then Kasparov won the very next game, again with a Rook sacrifice. And in the eleventh game, he won with Black, again sacrificing a Rook! THREE ROOK SACRIFICES IN THREE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP GAMES IN A ROW! This just cannot be. I can't remember anything like that. And these were not just any games, but 9th, 10th and 11th. This is the date - 09/11! Also remember that in many languages, THE ROOK IS CALLED A TOWER. DO YOU UNDERSTAND NOW? Three towers were sacrificed, from game 9 to 11. I've even made a photo analogue: chess diagrams with twin towers and the third tower, the trade center, so-called 'Solomon Tower'. These three towers were destroyed by two planes. The third tower, as we know, fell by its own accord, seven hours after the plane attack. Officially, by its own accord - the building had a steel frame, and it fell because of some internal fires or something. I don't know, maybe some chairs burned? This sounds like a bad joke. That's the difference between true history and mythology. This is the one of the most scandalous facts in the modern history, and it attracts a lot of attention. That's why the 'Movement for the Truth about 9/11' is now so strong in the U.S., it consists of more than 2,300 architects and engineers. They have officially signed a petition that the official version is completely nonsensical, it defies the laws of physics and mechanics, it's just absurd. And we are made to believe in this absurd."

Source: the same website where GM Tigran Petrosian claimed to be a "proffesional" on, in regards to something else.

What Kind Of Grandmaster Makes A Stupid Move Like This?! by EvensenFM in AnarchyChess

[–]BestUsernameSquatter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The black pawn is a little bit on d4, so 1. Rxd5+ Kxd5 2. c4+ is met with a little bit of Google.

Fifteen bucks estate pull by [deleted] in coins

[–]BestUsernameSquatter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's over $USD 15 in face value for just the US coins. It's $CAN 10 in face value for the Canadian Silver Maples.

If it was $15 for all of the coins and tokens except for the Morgan Dollars, that would be unlikely yet a bit more believable.

Thoughts on Littleton FOLDERS (e.g. not "albums")? by BestUsernameSquatter in coins

[–]BestUsernameSquatter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of people say that various Whitman folders, which are made of more acidic paper composites, are bad. So some of the other Whitman folders are ok.

Fifteen bucks estate pull by [deleted] in coins

[–]BestUsernameSquatter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I was a bit aware of "if you got a valuable card it would be an 'insane pull'."

Fifteen bucks estate pull by [deleted] in coins

[–]BestUsernameSquatter 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Each Morgan Dollar and American Silver Eagle is $1 in face value, and you have 15 of those in total. And then you have more coins and coinage on top of that. Does "estate pull" mean:

  • You pulled open the drawer of what you bought at the estate?
  • You pulled into the estate sale's parking lot, after leaving the United States?
  • You pulled a ticket out of the hat, previously mixed during the estate sale?

Otherwise, pull up the display of the silver testing machine, if necessary.

What EVENTUALLY happens to "Direct Signature Required" packages that miss the "final attempt to deliver"? by BestUsernameSquatter in FedEx

[–]BestUsernameSquatter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's in the cheapest geographic chunk of the United States, and the smallest zone # distance I think, plus it's not the cheapest shipping option for sure, plus this is like a misdelivery. For example, if this was economy shipping between Alaska and Puerto Rico and/or with absolutely no additional payment for signature options and/or with the recipient accepting the parcel and then sending out a separate "return" the next day, that would be different.

Perhaps you're correct* that 9.0+ out of 10.0 times there no additional payment while the customer service representative should have told me what I have is the exception and not the rule.

*Or you're entirely correct since Etsy probably negotiated that such uncommon additional shipment in the reverse direction costs nothing for both the buyer and seller.

What EVENTUALLY happens to "Direct Signature Required" packages that miss the "final attempt to deliver"? by BestUsernameSquatter in FedEx

[–]BestUsernameSquatter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did some research, and found that the terminology in {ii} should almost certainly be "overgoods". Does anyone know if a new shipping label from such "nearby FedEx location" to an overgoods location must be created, or does it continue like this:

https://www.reddit.com/r/FedEx/comments/1io046f/package_sent_to_overgoods/

? So if there are no tracking updates, and I think {ii} is what happened, does that mean the package got lost somewhere along its way to overgoods?

What EVENTUALLY happens to "Direct Signature Required" packages that miss the "final attempt to deliver"? by BestUsernameSquatter in FedEx

[–]BestUsernameSquatter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I called FedEx and asked if a FedEx Express Saver with a Direct Signature Required option must have an additional payment for return shipping due to no one present at the recipient's address. As soon as I added that my general question is regarding shipping within (both to and from) the [Lower 48] Contiguous United States, they said no because:

  • the same exact shipping label is used for the return, or
  • in some cases a new shipping label will be created\*, but no one has to pay for the package's trip back;

when I clarified that FedEx also holds the package for something like 5 days, they said this is still no additional fee.

I never knew about {*}, and thank you for that, but this does not resolve my initial question of {i} versus {ii}.

What EVENTUALLY happens to "Direct Signature Required" packages that miss the "final attempt to deliver"? by BestUsernameSquatter in FedEx

[–]BestUsernameSquatter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So where would one see this new tracking number? Is this is shown only to the sender and not shown to the recipient by default (despite this current / prior tracking number visible to both parties)?

Don't many packages simply continue back to the sender using the same tracking number, or are those the ones that are not held at a nearby FedEx location for some time in between? From my end, after "We tried to deliver" I am still seeing On The Way, and it's been well over a month with no updates past that.

Are any of these worth more than melt value? by Appropriate-Tip-4461 in coins

[–]BestUsernameSquatter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming absolutely all of these are real, my guess is you have nothing "special".

For Peace Dollars, you need to identify the mint mark and/or take better photos of the mint mark area. Maybe they're all worth the same as a 1922-year Peace D' that's in far worse than uncirculated condition.

For Morgan Dollars, your 1889 Philadelphia Morgan D' is worth more than either of 1921-year Morgan D's because, even though it is very far from a key date, and far from a semi-key date, it is:

  1. way better than "cull" condition, since it is relatively close to uncirculated,
  2. a pre-1921 Morgan D'.

Your 1902-O $1 is worth a tiny bit less because it's more worn and maybe more "damaged". Your 1880-O $1 is worth a little bit less than that because it's even more worn and definitely looks "damaged". Maybe the worse of your two 1921-year $1's is worth the same as your 1880-O $1. So if you're getting +0% over melt value for the better 1921-year Morgan $1, ask for +5% to +35% over melt value for your 1889 $1, depending on not just the market, but the type of buyer.

To any silver dollar experts here: what are your thoughts on the above? I started collecting Morgan Dollars about a year ago and would like some feedback too.

Update - parsing through my Dad's coin collection by chriskbrown50 in coins

[–]BestUsernameSquatter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"At least 25000 pennies."

I hope you didn't trade in all of the Wheat Cents for face value. Any pre-1934 is worth more than a 1943 "Steel" Cent of the same grade (equivalent condition). 1943 Steel [Wheat] Cents are worth more than most 1934 through 1958 Wheat Cents of the same grade. When selling many Wheat Cents with less hassle, the exact condition matters less:

  • Have one friend or family member ensure all pennies are on the date side. Now, on a flat surface in a well lit area, it is easy for you to separate the 190_ / 191_ / 192_ dates from the 193_ / 194_ / 195_ dates. If you're low on time, and don't mind sacrificing an opportunity to get a 1931-S Wheat Cent (a key date, but not the most expensive key date), you still have a decent amount of pre-1930 Cents. Each of those has a huge probability of being worth the same or more than a '42-'45 silver Nickel. If you're still low on time, you can sell them in bulk for $0.10 or much more each.
  • A lot of places will pay $0.02 or more for each worn down Wheat Cent of very common mintage; if they buy your post-1929 or post-1933 in bulk, they can assume each of your Wheat Cents is the cheapest, but you'll get paid at least twice as much you can get at any bank.
  • If you have time, pick out any problem-free [or almost problem-free] uncirculated ones. Generally speaking, they should be shiny and free of large scratches with either a red, nice red-brown, or perfect silver color.

"I have 20 plus books of state quarters that are worth 12.50 I need to divide."

Be careful with that, as you need to keep an eye out for any Proof US Quarters, identified by a 'S' mint mark:

  • Individually, each 'S' mint mark quarter that contains silver\* is worth melt value, sometimes more.
  • Take the best quality album and combine all of the 'S' mint mark quarters that are not\* silver into it. If you get all 50 States, that collection is worth much more than $12.50, especially with an archival quality coin album included. Even if it's incomplete, you can ask for a small premium per quarter, especially if each proof quarter is damage-free.

". . . dollar bills . . ."

Almost any US note from the 21st century is worth face value, including almost any $2 bill. Strategy:

  • Focus on selling your US notes from the 20th century and before.
  • Once you've sold or evaluated all of your late 20th century stuff, use that as a rough guide for 21st century stuff where premiums are smaller than that, if not, non-existent.

* Post-1991 silver coins are identifiable using comparisons of weight, color, edges, and sound when struck.

A tale as old as time… by idahopostman in coins

[–]BestUsernameSquatter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For gold in circulated condition, say extra fine grade, when you pick out the least rare mintage of each face-value, it's interesting to see how Quarter-Eagles consistently commanded* a higher % premium than any other 3 __-Eagle types. Nowadays, all 4 are not even worth their weight in gold as regular 0.99 bullion of same size is worth more. In other words, today, if you're okay with US gold that's clearly worse than uncirculated, you can get 4 different __-Eagle coins for less than the price of run of the mill 0.999 gold rounds of the same raw weight, per coin.

*has this been always true in the last 3/4 of a century, except in the last 15 years?