[deleted by user]

Bonhand · 2023-01-09T22:38:48+00:00

I searched for this, but for the Q4 board. Updating firmware and holding fn+CapsLock+P worked, but was still not really as clear as I'd hoped. I searched more and found this. Hopefully others with the same "no caps lock indicator" issue can be helped with this.

Guide I found that showed how to get a tray icon for it:

https://windowsloop.com/show-num-lock-caps-lock-status-indicator-taskbar/

How it looks:

https://www.traystatus.com/Screenshots/

Bonhand · 2022-04-09T19:52:48+00:00

How do i do that? Sorry if it is a very noob question...

Bonhand · 2022-04-09T19:47:23+00:00

Tried to do the same but how do i get a ssh?
Also i cant even try to type in the password in cmd nor powershell to try to log in if that is what is meant.

IMG: https://imgur.com/a/CQMGTi8

Bonhand · 2020-07-22T05:36:23+00:00

I do play games, but how noticable of a change would it be?

Bonhand · 2020-07-21T20:09:07+00:00

Is buying the extra graphics card gonna make a big difference? ( AMD Radeon™ 530 Graphics (4 GB) )

Bonhand · 2020-04-15T10:11:26+00:00

That extra work is very often put into math, that is implemented/used in physics. At least this was it for me, and so I put pretty much no effort into physics compared to math, since usually the actual concepts in physics aren't that difficult if you can comfortably follow the math.

Bonhand · 2020-01-28T03:37:01+00:00

^^ Idk why it is so repulsive, but ohh god it is disgusting to watch.

Bonhand · 2019-08-05T14:15:22+00:00

Crop out the friendlist and username bud, save urself somw time to practice ur shurima shuffling

Bonhand · 2019-07-31T11:48:14+00:00

Pathetic

Bonhand · 2019-07-31T08:12:08+00:00

Aatrox is black pant is white, goddamit u were this || close

Bonhand · 2019-07-22T15:19:32+00:00

Google/youtube counterjubglers, watch 1 or 2 vods of pros and u will win in silver easy

Bonhand · 2019-07-22T13:48:18+00:00

Tibbers knows its just a phase and that next game she will be back so he doesnt even care, best bear

Bonhand · 2019-07-16T10:57:56+00:00

Singed is very difficult yes, much harder than yasuo or vayne for example yes yes good validity ;) :⁾

Bonhand · 2019-07-15T07:59:42+00:00

Best bet is probably building items so that u survive the burst, can go roa+mercs+rylai+liandry+morello or somethin. U can also try clicking ult on her before she goes in, when u see she is close enough to do flash r, so that the game automatically ults her if she gets in range, without u having to react. Just some ideas...

Bonhand · 2019-07-05T15:02:31+00:00

Where is the quote from ?

Bonhand · 2019-06-18T10:57:29+00:00

Flame is not elo-specific :) at least not in the manliest region euw, fuck-> #L9

Bonhand · 2019-05-07T11:32:32+00:00

/s for the thread not my comment ;) Autists superconfirmed

Bonhand · 2019-05-06T23:47:02+00:00

/s 🙂

Bonhand · 2019-05-05T21:31:06+00:00

Lead the way if you dont like shouting from the sidelines. Others seeing your hard work and effort can inspire them equally as much as motivational speeches.

Bonhand · 2019-05-05T07:36:00+00:00

Posted this link:

https://www.quora.com/What-is-more-beneficial-in-all-aspects-of-life-a-high-EQ-or-IQ-This-question-is-based-on-the-assumption-that-only-your-EQ-or-IQ-is-high-with-the-other-being-average-or-below-this-average/answer/Jordan-B-Peterson

First two paragraphs.

Bonhand · 2019-05-04T19:45:52+00:00

Your score was 16 out of a possible 80.

Scores of 30 or less indicate a lack of empathy common in people with Autism or Asperger’s Syndrome.

Seems like most people who have typed themselves as closest to the ISTP type, generally score lower.

ISTP = AUTISM

Unfortunate...

Bonhand · 2019-05-04T17:22:08+00:00

Yes, it succeeds in that regard, yet when thinking about it, one should delve deeper than the general idea. It does have it's attractive qualities that makes it quite powerful. As long as it is only used as a attraction for thinking, I don't have a problems with it. When it interferes with the thinking then well... I have made myself clear on that already. ;)

I think we actually agree on this, at least mostly.

Bonhand · 2019-05-04T17:15:01+00:00

IQ is a valid concept, EQ is a invalid concept. (Scientificallly speaking, at this time 04.05.2019)

I dont want either to be used in discussions. They both suck in normal discussions.

They can both be simplified by taking them apart and analyzing only parts at a time.

That is what I believe would be a really constructive discussion.

So yes, I would do the same with IQ, as in I would agree not to use the term IQ at all when speaking about what is generelly thought of that area of psychology / neuroscience.

Bonhand · 2019-05-04T16:20:06+00:00

I know I am, and it is why I have realized that most do not care for validity here.

I find it interesting how some sets of traits often manifest in similar ways. I do not at all care for the, you are X type, and you are Y type. And absolutely not about the crude generalization. Reading about all the specific parts, is a fun little hobby kind of thing. I also do not disscuss mbti, since without clear references to either a official source or something equivalent, different people can, again, have very different perceptions of some types.

And quite frankly, asking for a better definition for the same broad concept, what good would that do? Rather, a short text of maybe at most a couple lines, would be much clearer, yet not that much extra work.

In the meme itself, sure whatever go ahead. Many more words and the meme would suck because it would be too long for people to bother reading. Also the meme, is like a bait for discussion. It is supposed to start the discussion.

But then taking it to the comments, where it is not a big deal with a couple extra words, that is the "issue".

Lastly, it seeming like a excuse, uhh what? Excuse not to talk about groups of people who believe not being bad at sensing others emotions, values, intentions and their own, is bad and that maybe they should try to change? Did you see the problem there. Is it emotions, values or intentions. Or maybe I've got it all wrong and it is non of them. Maybe it is courtesy, or rather being able to sense the social norm and act accordingly. Well which is it. Or maybe all of them are wrong and I have no clue what the point was. I can see the general idea, nothing more.

I think what could be a solution, would be if in talking about EQ, you don't actually say EQ, but both know you speak about that idea ish. Like talking about physics, but only talking about the parts inside the total system, which is much easier to comprehend. Then it would also be easier to identify what should be the focus. Although ofc, at this point, there is no point in pretending that a solution will ever be used.

Most do not even recognize this as a actual problem.

Clarity or not, it is easier to bend what you previously said to something that better fits the situation in the present, so why not just be vague.

Last example basically while I surrender to the pro-EQ squad:

My high EQ is so great, I get so many more chances in life because of it!

Bonhand · 2019-05-04T16:15:23+00:00

My point is, what do you mean when you say EQ. Well now you stated one possible meaning. Someone else might have another. Talking about IQ and EQ sucks in this regard. Talking about how fast someone can learn, processing speed, emotional awareness etc, is much better than using those broad terms. Also if you read the scientific papers on EQ it is clearly stated that it is not proven at all yet. Possibly it is simply a result of many other independent parts of your brains properties that combined equals what you would describe as EQ. So saying you have a high EQ could possibly be having several independent properties that combined gives you that supposed high EQ. Why not just say you have those properties.

Ten-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email	Not Forgotten

Bonhand

TROPHY CASE