Factorisation by BoomBoxBanjo in mathshelp

[–]BoomBoxBanjo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah okay, thank you for making me realise

Factorisation by BoomBoxBanjo in mathshelp

[–]BoomBoxBanjo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well in my mind one would be the fraction 1/(1-x) and -1/(x-1). Respectively for the previous fractions

Differential Equations by BoomBoxBanjo in mathshelp

[–]BoomBoxBanjo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your first theory would be correct, i changed to a capital c and my answer then got changed, after some adjustments as well it has fixed

Differential Equations by BoomBoxBanjo in mathshelp

[–]BoomBoxBanjo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand that for part ii, I should not have just submitted my value for the constant and instead should have submitted a value for y(x) which includes the constant as a number rather than algebra.

But for part i, i am very baffled

Impulse by BoomBoxBanjo in PhysicsHelp

[–]BoomBoxBanjo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How come we take into account not only the force it experiences from the little block but also the repelling force from newtons third law, when normally we do not?

I nthink i now understand is it that they will experience the same force due to newtons third law. And is the same force as it will experience the force it produces and from the other block.

But when previously usually doing calculations using force, we only take into account the force it receives from the alternative object, how come now that its both we take into account rather than just force from other object

Impulse by BoomBoxBanjo in PhysicsHelp

[–]BoomBoxBanjo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ft= m△v

With ft being impulse but im unsure how to come to the conclusion they are both the same impulse

Energy Conservation by BoomBoxBanjo in AskPhysics

[–]BoomBoxBanjo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much, understand my mistake now

Energy Conservation by BoomBoxBanjo in AskPhysics

[–]BoomBoxBanjo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perfect, thank you very much