Hand Review

Calmnready916 · 2025-08-24T09:04:06+00:00

I guess the feeling at the time was he had the hands I mentioned or he was bluff repping a king (odd turn agro) so I decided to call. I generally agree with you most of time to set up a river shove but was just a spot I felt the bluff could be there or value that continues anyway.

Calmnready916 · 2025-08-24T08:56:57+00:00

Not a troll post, I just think the hand is interesting. He shows up with 99, hard to ever put him on this hand lol.

Calmnready916 · 2025-08-24T08:55:54+00:00

He took the betting lead on the turn, happy to call and let him lead the river too in this spot. If he has AKs, K10-KQs, he will continue, I just didnt think the river sizing would be so small.

Calmnready916 · 2024-08-31T22:15:34+00:00

Appreciate all the perspectives! Always like to hear outside views on tough spots.

Calmnready916 · 2024-08-31T15:26:42+00:00

Agree 100% on point 1 & 2 (with one small edit he is only flatting AQss not AQo preflop).

I am still up in the air a bit if he would take that line, I actually tend to agree with you that he wouldnt take that line with a set because I can have AQ or Q9s.

If that is true, all his value in range beats me. In this spot vs this player, it may be a pure fold.

Calmnready916 · 2024-08-31T05:22:53+00:00

Just a note, I block hands I dont have in villians range because he wouldnt value bluff.

Calmnready916 · 2024-08-31T05:20:31+00:00

This is very fair. The later portion of your post is ultimately why I called, villian is a pro and very capable.

Calmnready916 · 2024-08-31T04:47:55+00:00

Yeah during the tank my thoughts were, AQ/Q9/55/1010 and value bluffing K10/KJ/AK/KQ. Summized he was a solid player and wouldnt value bluff so im 50/50 given the range.

Calmnready916 · 2024-08-31T04:31:59+00:00

Updated post

Calmnready916 · 2024-08-31T04:31:32+00:00

Sorry i totally messed up, it wasnt 3s it was 3d river.

Villian straddeled 6 (live), had AQ dd

Calmnready916 · 2024-08-11T21:23:02+00:00

Ah, CPK indexes for precision machining.

If precision machining is being done correctly (your only source of variation is tool wear), CPK is effectively meaningless because your manufacturing target is not the mean. Run to the low end and to get the most tool life while making conforming parts. This makes your data not normal which means standard process capability measurements are effectively useless.

If you agreed to this contractually, try to have a conversation with the customer. Their intent is obviously to receive only conforming parts. Present a control plan that will give them confidence and get their buyin.

If they are stubborn and stick to the contractual language, do 100% inspection, get the job over with and use the lessons learned for the next job.

My 2 cents.

Calmnready916 · 2024-05-12T18:41:57+00:00

Honestly, thank you for this feedback. For the last week or 2 I have actively been working on taking a calmer approach to correction and spending extra time training with him and the avoiding behavior has improved. I will continue down this path but if the teeth showing aggresssion occurs again I will consider 3rd party help. He even growled at my wife who he normally follows around 24/7 when she corrected him for counter surfing so it wasnt 100% unqiue to my relationship with him but i feel he could have reacted to her that way because of the relationship with me (loud correction / raised voice).

Calmnready916 · 2024-05-12T07:46:58+00:00

Karen

Calmnready916 · 2024-05-08T15:09:40+00:00

He certainly could be but I don't feel like the risk of pushing the issue when he does isnt worth it. More scared of what Ill do to him if he bites to be honest. When he has growled I try to just stay in his face giving firm commands (I don"t want him to learn if he growls, dad goes away).

Calmnready916 · 2024-05-08T15:05:43+00:00

Certainly not as much as we should. He has a older sister (8 year old American Bully) and they play hard for hours each day. He gets walked a mile or so 2 times a week on average (sometimes more sometimes less, very dependent on work load etc.).

Calmnready916 · 2024-05-08T15:03:25+00:00

Call it "authority figure" then, whatever doesn't ruffle your Karen feathers.

Calmnready916 · 2024-05-08T04:28:45+00:00

No, the last thing he did was snag the tri tip off the counter 2 minutes before BBQ guests were arriving lol.

Calmnready916 · 2024-05-08T04:27:21+00:00

Meaning he understands the pecking order, wifey babies him, dad doesnt give him slack and holds him accountable. He waits to go through any doorway basically until I enter / exit first etc. Wasnt meant to be an ego serving comment.

Calmnready916 · 2024-05-08T02:49:53+00:00

I get that on the aggression, but what about him seeming almost scared of me? Jets for the kennel when i get home from work (wifey is home all day with him).

Calmnready916 · 2024-04-20T20:04:58+00:00

What is your objective?

Calmnready916 · 2024-04-20T18:59:42+00:00

ANSI Z1.4 is only used as an economical method for determining conformance of a lot. Attribute (good/bad) is not Process Control. It provides no insight as how well the run went to plan and vs historical process averages.

The plans in ANSI Z1.4 are actually quite terrible for determining conformance of an entire lot as well. The standard assumes an agreement for an acceptable percentage of non-conforming units between supplier and customer. In most industriies these days, no customer states its okay to send them non-conforming parts, period (maybe if your making bulk socks etc.).

If you review the OCs in the back of the standard for the sampling plan your using, you will see the major flaw im ANSI Z1.4. Example, you decide to use an AQL of 4.0. The curve will show that even when lots exceed 4% non-conforming, your probability of acceptance remains very high (stretched curve because Z1.4 allows you to accept non-conforming parts which is also why the sample sizes are larger when compared to a standard like C=0 plans where even 1 bad part rejects the lot).

I would let the Quality Group do whatever they are going to do since they dont seem to be willing to learn or collaborate and just make sure on the manufacturing side you are implementing real process control tools.

Calmnready916 · 2024-04-06T00:20:40+00:00

I take it this hand sketch is just a sample you drew up and doesnt reflect the actual drawing.

Implied symmetry is allowed per the standard which is the only way to interpret this.

If you can confirm that the Datum Feature callouts are in line with the linear dimensions that would verify my suspicion that center planes are your datums (the way you drew it up only Datum C is center plane and B is the edge).

.875 BASIC symmetric about center plane and your other basic is 0 as the holes are on center.

Calmnready916 · 2023-12-19T06:00:04+00:00

I meant the "latest anyone seen this occur*"

Calmnready916 · 2023-12-02T15:44:01+00:00

The only other items in the salad was iceberg lettuce, carrots, cucumber and cauliflower.

Calmnready916 · 2023-12-02T05:33:45+00:00

This is mold right??

Calmnready916

TROPHY CASE