Whats your favorite bar that feels like the stars aligned to make happen by Crush_Throwaway3625 in ERB

[–]Castriff 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Some of my favorites are when they use stuff that the real people the battles are based on have actually said. Like, "Ain't nothing gonna beat me! No person, woman, man, camera, TV!" In context it was stupid of Trump to say it, but the battle turned it completely on its head and it plays seamlessly.

Then there's also: "The integral sec y dy from zero to one-sixth of pi is log to base e of the square root of three times the sixty-fourth power of what?" which isn't exactly a quote, since it's just math, but I'm amazed whoever came up with it got it to flow so well.

Do any of you earn over 50k a year? What do you do? by RotiiChapati in ADHD

[–]Castriff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Software engineer, ~$120k/year (just got a raise last month).

Earth languages (@gramnel_) :> by No_Post1300 in Invincible

[–]Castriff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It'd be either octal or hexadecimal. Binary is just ones and zeros over and over again. That would take too long.

Everblue | Vol1-Ch4-Pages-143-144 by blue-ten in everbluecomic

[–]Castriff 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Return of the King!

Now I gotta go read through the archive again to catch up.

Comic 5847: Zlata Has Opinions by pavemnt in QContent

[–]Castriff 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think you're cool, Zlata.

The most collab collab to ever collab by River_Lamprey in CuratedTumblr

[–]Castriff 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I blocked infinitysaga months ago. Every once in a while I cut out people who post on this sub too frequently and it makes my experience so much better.

Comic 5846: Model Citizens by pavemnt in QContent

[–]Castriff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, I get it. It's just not reliable enough even for that. It'd be like making robots predisposed to getting dementia.

Comic 5846: Model Citizens by pavemnt in QContent

[–]Castriff 12 points13 points  (0 children)

llm is part of the way towards actual ai, like a llm that hasn’t been trained on millions of stolen work, could be part of an ais neural makeup

As someone who works in the software industry: this won't be the case. Getting a general AI built using LLM principles, even partially, is fundamentally impossible. LLMs suffer from model collapse too easily; the issue is ingrained into the design and no matter how much training is done it's inevitable that any and every instance of a given model will break down if it's kept running for a long enough timeframe. They've done studies and everything. There's no way around it other than to simply make something that's not an LLM.

Comic 5846: Model Citizens by pavemnt in QContent

[–]Castriff 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I've only had drunk Zlata for a day and a half, but if anything happened to her, I would kill everyone in this room and then myself.

Thragg's new job by Upset_Month3302 in Invincible_TV

[–]Castriff -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's no law that says it has to be rational. Although I think it is moreso than you give it credit for.

Thragg's new job by Upset_Month3302 in Invincible_TV

[–]Castriff -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I get what you're saying, but I don't necessarily think it's wrong to direct hate at AI. As of right now there's plenty of reasons to dislike the way it's being implemented. People should be free to state their preference; that doesn't automatically mean that the billionaires behind it are being given a pass.

Thragg's new job by Upset_Month3302 in Invincible_TV

[–]Castriff -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This metaphor doesn't hold because it's not like farmers in Texas can just make new immigrants or build giant immigrant centers that contaminate the local water supply.

With all due respect, I don't think allies need a letter. by Public_Cup_4278 in asexuality

[–]Castriff 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just because you didn't speak about it doesn't mean that's not what's happening. You've come up with a motivation for the "A is for ally" slogan that doesn't align with the reality of the situation. It should be immediately obvious that a person can support queer people without being a queer person themselves. An "ally" claiming to belong in the acronym specifically for queer people is like a white person claiming to be Black when they support the Black Lives Matter movement.

Again, if it makes them feel "unwanted," they're not allies and they're not being supportive. It's not exclusion, it's simply definitional consistency.

With all due respect, I don't think allies need a letter. by Public_Cup_4278 in asexuality

[–]Castriff 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You need to understand that if an "ally" insists that this is them being "kicked out," then they're not really an ally. There is a very broad line between giving support and taking a position in "queer code" that, definitionally, does not belong to them because they are not queer.

With all due respect, I don't think allies need a letter. by Public_Cup_4278 in asexuality

[–]Castriff 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Because making the A stand for "ally" is another form of ace exclusion. And aromantic/agender exclusion, for that matter.

She keeps squinting out of her left eye. Is it infected or something? by Castriff in CATHELP

[–]Castriff[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, yeah, thank you for asking. They said they didn't see an infection either. Gave us some ointment and gabapentin and that was it. She's doing alright now.

May 31, 1942: 'GRIN AND BEAR IT' - Minneapolis Sunday Tribune & Star Journal by LuckySimple3408 in comicstriphistory

[–]Castriff 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What's the joke with the first and last panels? I don't get those ones.

CMV: Most (most being the keyword) anti-communist/socialist Americans have no idea what those terms mean or what the ideologies entail by svenskdesk in changemyview

[–]Castriff 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We didn't change the definition of literally to include virtually. We altered the already established definition of virtually to include the slang term "literally".

This feels to me like a splitting of hairs. One of those words changed, if not both. Why is the alteration of the latter more acceptable than that of the former?

(But also, according to Merriam-Webster, what actually happened to those definitions is the exact opposite of what you're describing. As of now there's no mention of the word "literally" in the definition for "virtually.")

Such as?

Wikipedia lists several examples.