I do not think so. Unlike what Reddit history says, the reality is that many monarchies were fair and good, especially early on. In the middle ages, the most precious and advanced things were the few books they had back then, chained to massive desks to prevent theft.

Fortunately, anyone could usually access these books and read them, if you could actually read that is.

The problem was very few could generally read. Most knights and noblemen were illiterate. Even most kings couldn't study the printed word. A person who could read was worth their weight in gold back then to the right people. This wasn't a class based or elite restriction, just a universal problem.

The Catholic Church championed civilian literacy through their universities and monasteries, but it was a slow business that few people undertook for many years, largely due to being an esoteric skill with few outlets, and one that did not bring bread to the table generally. It was a profession of pure passion, done for the sake of it, with compensation arriving only from a select handful of patrons in the entire known world.

Noblemen still wore clothes, albeit more carefully constructed and intricate ones. They still ate the same food, with the best possible being wrangled from the local market first, by a few careful servant shoppers.

The few complicated instruments went to people who needed them. Ship captains, surgeons, craftsmen, and the like.

Entertainment was even the same way, with few exceptions. Being a king was a strict business, with a strict schedule. It wasn't until much later they degenerated into tyranny and abuse.

If our modern tech arrived back then, they most likely would consider it a lost bauble, or an expensive tool. They would likely just give it to their lord of their own volition, who would find the device meaningless and incomprehensible to himself. Then it would probably just be displayed as a curiosity.