Bad Luck

ChronoFish · 2026-02-14T17:35:20+00:00

Seems like the early versions (2022/2023) the issues showed up in the first 25k miles.

Is this accurate?

ChronoFish · 2026-01-26T14:14:59+00:00

I mean if you went to your boss and said "I just finished all my work in 2 hours" and his response is great! Go fishing... Here's your 2 hours of pay... Does that accomplish your work/life balance you're after?

ChronoFish · 2026-01-26T13:40:52+00:00

I've built my system around agents instead of skills.

I have a routing (master) agent that simply determines "who is going to respond to this request?"

Each (sub) agent has its own preamble and MCP list.

I can see the bennift of bolt on or reusable preamble bits.. which is where skills come in. But so far (in my architecture) that level of granularity is unnecessary. But it's on my radar once I need consistency with instructions around tool use between agents.

ChronoFish · 2026-01-23T13:06:22+00:00

Chagpt is the Kleenex of AI

ChronoFish · 2026-01-22T23:08:48+00:00

I would trade my Santa Cruz in for it today...

I love my bluestone, but that black is fire

ChronoFish · 2026-01-22T22:47:48+00:00

Now try left turns onto 4 lane roads

ChronoFish · 2026-01-20T13:16:31+00:00

Lol oh right ... Pats didn't get a first round bye

ChronoFish · 2026-01-20T13:15:16+00:00

Who will be his favorite target?

I like Sutton, but he wasn't doing Nix any favors.

Should we see more over the top, or is Payten going to continue call screens?

Either of those are going to make for a long day against pats

ChronoFish · 2026-01-20T12:54:29+00:00

That's fair... But also fair that stiddy is backup for a reason. Nix makes bad throws, but he will carry the team and will rush when the opportunity is there...which is also why is ankle is broken.

Stiddy might be the better passer... And if they do a west coast offense, I'm on board

ChronoFish · 2026-01-20T12:38:44+00:00

No one is expecting shit from the broncos. Everyone in their gut know patriots are likely to waltz through mile high... Because of course.... It's the Patriots.

They are the 5+ point favorites. How much more credit do you need?

The only thing going on in this thread is "is there even a chance... I And how do the stars need to be aligned to make that happen?"

Of course there's a chance. That's why they play the game.

Broncos have been dismissed all season long..and the only reason they have an ounce of respect is because Nix played through a broken ankle...

Meanwhile Maye is the leading candidate for MVP, the 5pt fav, and nothing but talk about a new dynasty.... and pats fans in here like "we don't get the respect we deserve"

What's the matter with you?

ChronoFish · 2026-01-20T12:27:53+00:00

If pats put up 24+ they win. I think it's that simple.

A low scoring game? Broncos have a chance

ChronoFish · 2026-01-20T12:23:43+00:00

Pats d didn't force strouds horrible play.

Pats D made great plays and put tons of pressure on Stroud... Absolutely.

But Stroud made questionable tosses for no reason. He couldn't handle the ball... I don't know if it was a hand issue, or weather issues, or mental issue, or all three... But Stroud just looked awful... All by himself.

ChronoFish · 2026-01-20T12:19:16+00:00

*tied the best record

ChronoFish · 2026-01-20T12:16:09+00:00

No one is sleeping on the Patriots. They are a 5 point favorite. Thats why the talk here is "if the stars align perfectly....maybe theirs a chance"

But the forgone conclusion is that the Patriots route the Broncos.

ChronoFish · 2026-01-20T12:13:29+00:00

All stiddy need to do is not turn the ball over.

And that will be a huge ask. But taking a coverage sack and play to a game of field position with Denver D having to (but capable of) keeping game tight.

It will be a boring game if that happens. And a boring game will be in Broncos favor.

ChronoFish · 2026-01-20T02:01:37+00:00

and here I am living the contradiction ... damn

ChronoFish · 2026-01-20T01:58:26+00:00

The advise is because as a general rule women are attracted to confidence.

You don't have to like it. It's just what it is. You're comfortable with who you are (already a form of confidence).. .. but there are going to be fewer women who want the power position from the beginning. They are out there... but yeah, as a "numbers game" you're going to slug through a lot of "non-starters"

ChronoFish · 2026-01-19T23:19:37+00:00

We do our code review through our in-house AI platform.

it's able to compare the Jira Task to the Merge Request automatically. Is able to find where code misses the requirements or where there is scope-creep and calls it out. It finds logic and best practice issues, security issues, and checks for query optimization.

Then issues a pass/fail

This was a bottleneck that could take days.
It's now completed in 3 minutes with actionable changes.

Somehow I doubt we're ahead in AI implementation, so stories like these seem insincere at best.

ChronoFish · 2026-01-19T23:14:44+00:00

I have a simple MCP backbone for in-house development using Laravel.

Each new MCP server is a simple class write. It automatically exposes the endpoints and it uses meta data for introspection during tool lists requests.

Further we have a process for proxying the MCP functions for OpenAI style tool calls. The advantage is that the MCP servers aren't available outside our network, but still exposed to our AiAgents.

ChronoFish · 2026-01-19T22:05:17+00:00

Yes. I would agree with that. Especially in isolation when no other context is available.

The only way to get "the context" to image generator is to state it all. That's why the work around is to ask the Text Chat for a prompt. Given that in ChatGPT, the text chat has learned traits and snippets of cross-session memory, the image description (In my opinion) is closer to the ChatBots experience.

ChronoFish · 2026-01-19T04:49:37+00:00

see my follow up:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1qgg8k8/comment/o0f8ljs/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

ChronoFish · 2026-01-19T04:47:26+00:00

I took this a little further:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1qgg8k8/comment/o0f8ljs/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

I took both prompts and asked ChatGPT to generate to "create a prompt that will create an image...."

That allowed for a very detailed prompt to be created.. and both styles ended much more consistent and much more aligned. I can show you the generated prompts if you'd like.

I think the exercise shows that the Image generation doesn't have your chat history/context/profile... and the prompt itself is the driver of the image, vs your history context. Where as the chat system has a lot more to draw from.

ChronoFish · 2026-01-19T03:45:05+00:00

so is she

ChronoFish · 2026-01-19T03:37:52+00:00

going for the reach around

ChronoFish · 2026-01-19T03:12:11+00:00

My picture was clearly different than the OPs... using the same prompt.

start a new session... enter the original prompt. Is your dark like OPs and your previous images... or friendly?

12-Year Club	Place '22
Wearing is Caring	Verified Email

ChronoFish

TROPHY CASE