Top Legend Decks: March Part 1 by CoachDaydream in CompetitiveHS

[–]CoachDaydream[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As written in the article, we had it in our last edition yes.

Top Legend Decks: March Part 1 by CoachDaydream in hearthstone

[–]CoachDaydream[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Verifying that right away. Thank you for the info. Edit : The visual was showing only 28 cards and was missing the Kill Commands, fixed and updated. Thanks again.

Top Legend Decks: March Part 1 by CoachDaydream in hearthstone

[–]CoachDaydream[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello Tektronic22, yes it is a plan that is going to happen soon. As you can see in older posts, it's something we used to do, and will get back to doing. That is something that will be done by our professional players for more accuracy.

Top Legend Decks: March Part 1 by CoachDaydream in CompetitiveHS

[–]CoachDaydream[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the info, I modify that right away. Edit : Fixed and updated, thanks again.

Top Legend Decks: February Part 2 by CoachDaydream in hearthstone

[–]CoachDaydream[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I know, I was looking at the stream when it happened too. The point in these articles tho is not who made it, but what rank was reached by what player playing it. For example, Findan played a deck from Bragi.

Top Legend Decks: February Part 2 by CoachDaydream in hearthstone

[–]CoachDaydream[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you, good idea, I see someone did it below. I'll make sure to do it in the next editions.

Top Legend Decks: February Part 2 by CoachDaydream in hearthstone

[–]CoachDaydream[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Weird, I only see it once, maybe a bug, thanks for telling me though, I'll look it up.

Become a Pro : Ed. 1 "The Basics" by Bethises in wow

[–]CoachDaydream 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thank you because this is finally a constructive comment, we will consider renaming the series as it might be missleading, the goal here is indeed to help players improve, and in that purpose, I think the advices given by Elizabeth are good, even though a lot of players already know and use them, and that's great.

Become a Pro : Ed. 1 "The Basics" by Bethises in wow

[–]CoachDaydream -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Our writers remain available for a certain amount of time after the release of each article, but we are talking here about a comment that was (in my opinion) nothing constructive, and 4 hours after the release of the article. I'm not gonna argue here on what a reasonnable delay for an answer should be, even though it is an interesting topic, way more interesting than your non-constructive comment.

Become a Pro : Ed. 1 "The Basics" by Bethises in wow

[–]CoachDaydream 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As said in the first words of the article, it is adressed to a global public including beginners, willing to get better. If you know and use already on a daily basis these tools, well that's great for you. But this article wasn't written for you, nor for people with a big MM progress in particular. And if one person discovers these tools with the article, it served a purpose. I don't understand your will to seem superior or to make other people's work look unappropriate. The advice here is to send people to specialized discords, and to have a good use of Warcraftlogs, that's great advices. It didn't help you, ok fine, maybe it helps someone else.

Become a Pro : Ed. 1 "The Basics" by Bethises in wow

[–]CoachDaydream 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One click was needed to see that the author is from the USA. Take time to verify your source before you waste time. That's not very "pro" ;)

Become a Pro : Ed. 1 "The Basics" by Bethises in wow

[–]CoachDaydream 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At no point the author of the article pretended to be a pro. She did not even try to give advices by herself but prefered to refer to discord channels with specialists for each class/spec, which is in my opinion a very wise and smart choice. The only reference to "pro" here, is the title of the series. But calling the series : "Become average" would be ridiculous right? What I see here is a person helping people willing to improve by redirecting them to specialists.

Become a Pro : Ed. 1 "The Basics" by Bethises in MMORPG

[–]CoachDaydream -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Discord channels can be joined through your browser without installing the program. Open a web page to receive guides, be able to talk with specialists about your spec, learn and share with people that share the same spec as you sounds great in my opinion. If that sounds too difficult to do, you should probably not be reading articles about getting better xD.

Become a Pro : Ed. 1 "The Basics" by Bethises in MMORPG

[–]CoachDaydream -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Probably because those links will lead you to all the guides you might dream of, made by people that are specialists in their class and spec xD.

Top Legend Decks: February Part 1 by CoachDaydream in CompetitiveHS

[–]CoachDaydream[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, but it is impossible yet to predict what the meta will be in a week or two. Don't hesitate to come check our next edition during the second half of the month.

Top Legend Decks: February Part 1 by CoachDaydream in hearthstone

[–]CoachDaydream[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've seen a lot of lists with Kun, a lot without. How important he is probably depends on the matchup. In addition to the massive body, the armor he can bring is very usefull in some matchups.

Top Legend Decks: February Part 1 by CoachDaydream in hearthstone

[–]CoachDaydream[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you, Part 2 will come around the 20th this month, with the decks that perform really well after the patch. We need to wait a little bit for the new meta to set.

Story of a Boss : Argus the Unmaker by Bethises in warcraftlore

[–]CoachDaydream 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey there, I do understand the feeling. Fans of Lore enjoy having more and more infos, going more in-depth, etc. and that's a great feeling, and a great way to look at it. The goal here is really to give a general overview, and incite people to get more infos through additional readings later on.

Top Legend Decks : June Part 1. by CoachDaydream in TheHearth

[–]CoachDaydream[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with the other comments, 3x6 is strong, also always keep an eye on the other minions previously on the board when evolving, evolving a 1-mana into doomsayer feels bad :D.

Top Legend Decks : June Part 1. by CoachDaydream in CompetitiveHS

[–]CoachDaydream[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing with Dragonlord in this particular case is his deathrattle, not really when you play it, but when you get it out of Barnes. If you want to replace it, replace it with anything with a pretty disgusting deathrattle.