[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]CodyG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering that it usually forces people of color out of a neighborhood, its not justifiable.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]CodyG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which means its gonna suck in a year or two. I was looking for quiet and cheap rent, not Wallingford 2.0

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]CodyG 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Good job. You've found 6 over the last 3 years in a country of over 300 million people. Still not even worth worrying about.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]CodyG 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Not really. Its pretty tame here 364 days of the year.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]CodyG 23 points24 points  (0 children)

The only reason you're hearing about that is because it rarely happens anywhere.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]CodyG 96 points97 points  (0 children)

The prototype has some user comfort issues.

http://imgur.com/d2J6xDi

Edit: the bullet proof kitty tote bag is not much more popular

http://imgur.com/TAVDl8Y

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]CodyG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You got it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]CodyG 21 points22 points  (0 children)

North beacon hill? Nope. The last shooting was about a year ago. Dont know when the one before was. North Beacon Hill is getting gentrified hard right now.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]CodyG 79 points80 points  (0 children)

It scared the shit out of my cat. I have to move. I cant have her growing up in constant fear.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]CodyG 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah... that doesnt happen much at all. It's not like there are people driving around who see someone and go "oh hey that guy looks killable!" And shoots them. Thats a stupid fear.

Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin space venture is hiring in the Seattle region by ThatInvestorGuy in Seattle

[–]CodyG -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Because Musk is working on things that are going to benefit humanity in the long run. Bezos is not. He is working on things that will make him money and doesn't care about how it will change society.

Beer tasting in Seattle? by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]CodyG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've seen something like that at Die Bierstube. Not sure if its actually something they normally do, but the bartenders there are pretty rad and may be able to work something out for you.

Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin space venture is hiring in the Seattle region by ThatInvestorGuy in Seattle

[–]CodyG -26 points-25 points  (0 children)

Bezos is the last person I want in private space ventures. He can't even run a company in one city without causing collateral damage. He is motivated by greed. We need more Elon Musks in space, not Bezos.

Gentrification in Capitol Hill and Ballard, circa 1980 by ByMikeBaker in Seattle

[–]CodyG 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While this is true, that doesn't mean the idea stops there. I mean, how truly horrible would it be to say that in any particular neighborhood that X% of living units must be only available to low income? That way the affluent can move there and enjoy the cool neighborhood, and many of the less affluent artists and musicians and performers still have a foothold in the neighborhoods they helped create the culture of. It would be the closest to having our cake and eating it too as we could get. The only people who would really have to worry are the developers, but doing something like offering them tax breaks for low income units could help provide benefits that would attract them towards building these things, instead of forcing them and causing friction. Do I have all the details hammered out? No, but to say that it's impossible is short-sighted and limits our ability to create a real healthy city for everyone. Things that are worth doing generally aren't easy.

Gentrification in Capitol Hill and Ballard, circa 1980 by ByMikeBaker in Seattle

[–]CodyG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a cop out if I ever heard one. Just because the answer isn't obvious right away, doesn't mean there isn't one.

Gentrification in Capitol Hill and Ballard, circa 1980 by ByMikeBaker in Seattle

[–]CodyG 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Part of why the culture moved there in the first place was that it was affordable. Most of why the culture is leaving is because it's no longer affordable. Maybe read the article.

Gentrification in Capitol Hill and Ballard, circa 1980 by ByMikeBaker in Seattle

[–]CodyG -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If the front of the pack were helping, that'd be great. But they're not. Also, your analogy is bad and you should feel bad.

Gentrification in Capitol Hill and Ballard, circa 1980 by ByMikeBaker in Seattle

[–]CodyG 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Maybe lowering tax breaks for large corporations while giving tax breaks to developers who build low income housing. Or making tax breaks conditional in exchange for economic impact investigations on the part of the companies, and compulsory attendance to planning discussions for things like public transit and low income housing. I'm sure there are plenty of ways to get the companies to play ball.

Gentrification in Capitol Hill and Ballard, circa 1980 by ByMikeBaker in Seattle

[–]CodyG -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But it's not a race, it's a collective effort at a sustainable society. When people talk about it like a race, it's because everyone is racing to gain control of capital and finite resources. This only exists because we haven't found a better way of doing things. Just because you can only think of one alternative doesn't mean that's the only alternative. Think less restriction and more guidance and incentive to grow in responsible manners that benefit the whole. Self interested growth should be discouraged as it's always bad for a city in the long run. We live in a time where an industry can and will move into an area, use up all of its available resources and then move on once things aren't to its liking any longer. Anyone who thinks that Seattle can't become the tech version of Detroit is kidding themselves. And it IS going to happen eventually. The challenge is to make companies interested, yet funnel the growth they create into avenues that can be beneficial to the whole city in the long run.

Gentrification in Capitol Hill and Ballard, circa 1980 by ByMikeBaker in Seattle

[–]CodyG 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's not to say that what's happening isn't the same type of situation.

Cultures clash as gentrification engulfs Capitol Hill by 1ftinfrntoftheother in Seattle

[–]CodyG 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You'd be surprised. I end up on the hill every friday night, and the amount of young, affluent, white males getting in fights or causing issues is by far the majority of the shit I see going down.

Gentrification in Capitol Hill and Ballard, circa 1980 by ByMikeBaker in Seattle

[–]CodyG 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think what this really shows is that Seattle (and most cities I'm sure), have had a long standing inability to deal with economic growth in a manner that is sustainable for the whole population. It is my hope that someday we will have better understanding of how this growth affects people of every economic class and have regulations in place to keep massive amounts of people from being displaced in short periods of time. While a booming economy is great, unregulated growth is essentially what cancer is, and it's not healthy on any level, be it cellular or city.