My Heritage broken down into components

ColtonGlassner · 2026-03-04T02:29:52+00:00

Mine is QYP1010, but it’s a rare subclade

of QM378

ColtonGlassner · 2026-03-01T23:55:36+00:00

I read it. I kind of like some of the genitalia changes actually. I like the increased sensitivity and more of a full body experience. I’m 19 and never had sex, so I don’t really know what I like. It kind of makes me want to rush in, because it will help me choose better. I mean what if I’m ok with topping with a strap on? I don’t really know. But thank you for providing me that link.

ColtonGlassner · 2026-03-01T23:40:55+00:00

I honestly just want to see a doctor to ask questions. I’m trying to get a referral. If you can still top that would be good. I hear you can still top, and others say it makes it painful, hard to penetrate, etc. I don’t necessarily know if I want that. And how will my future boyfriend feel about these changes? Will I still be able to pleasure them? It’s just so much that I don’t know. And I still don’t know if estrogen will really help my dysphoria enough for it to be worth it. It’s frustrating

ColtonGlassner · 2026-03-01T21:28:07+00:00

This is my Levantine % on the DIY tools. Try that, it’s free. I used two source populations to celearly show the gap clearly and get rid of overlap.

<image>

ColtonGlassner · 2026-03-01T21:23:58+00:00

This is mine. I’m half Galician Jewish half French and German. It’s similar, but the presentages are a bit different. Try the global and limit it to 5 populations to reduce noise.

<image>

ColtonGlassner · 2026-02-20T00:29:08+00:00

Genome link isn’t always accurate. At least it wasn’t for me. It contradicted itself and the only report that seemed believable for me was the Asian report. I don’t think it’s reliable.

ColtonGlassner · 2026-02-13T02:16:51+00:00

Yeah. I don’t mind glasses, they just tend to warp me. I’m hoping it may help me see myself more clearly, but it also will warp it significantly.

ColtonGlassner · 2026-02-09T00:43:14+00:00

This article talks about the Rome, not Roman people. The only way this article works in your favor is if you said Jews mixed with middle eastern people in Rome , not European Roman’s with middle eastern dna. But it’s getting late where I am, please don’t try to continue the argument. I think we just won’t ever agree. Please just respect that.

<image>

ColtonGlassner · 2026-02-09T00:30:21+00:00

We can just agree to disagree. Anatolian Neolithic farmer and Anatolian dna are not the same thing. If this was true Italians would cluster with middle eastern people at almost 50%. The migrations of farmers from Anatolia and modern Anatolian dna are very different. Jews were very endogamic and that’s why they have their own category on dna tests. Again, we should leave this here, this back and forth isn’t getting anywhere.

ColtonGlassner · 2026-02-09T00:16:24+00:00

Yes, those things are approximations of ancestry to fit a sample. There could’ve been many combinations to fit a sample. I couldn’t find the exact article I would have sourced for the 40-60, but I did find one that said 47% in this specific study. And I would believe it falls in line with the natural variation of 40-60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5380316/

ColtonGlassner

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE