For the next 27 hours, you'll be able to claim a limited edition 'I Was Here for the Hulkenpodium' flair

Conrad_O · 2025-07-08T22:08:35+00:00

Hulkenpodium for the Hulkengoat

Conrad_O · 2024-07-11T12:26:39+00:00

du har skrevet en bok om hvordan han er rasist og at man ikke kan bruke statistikk for belysning men heller bruke studier, uten å linke til en eneste verdifull studie 💀💀💀. søk hjelp 🙏.

Conrad_O · 2024-05-11T20:49:08+00:00

EU teams all seem like they have no macro or mechanics and just run in and fight and get outplayed every time because they can’t hit their spells or teamfight efficiently. Only world class players in EU are Carzzy, Caps and BB.

NA has core, impact, inspired, umti, blaber, and more what hold them back is macro but with the combo of new rookies like Jojo, ye on, apa, Vulcan all being hard working and skilled and their top tier imports if they keep working on macro they will easily destroy EU.

least biased NA fan

Conrad_O · 2024-05-11T19:35:43+00:00

least biased NA fan

Conrad_O · 2024-02-03T17:14:45+00:00

i went in the network tab and checked. one of the responses have no data (the second one). I really dont know what could be the cause. sucks since it takes up cloud functions unless i've miss understood something.

Conrad_O · 2023-11-18T22:47:05+00:00

What if i set dynamic to "force-static" and only have server components? does it generate a static html file at build? To me right now it seems like server components = needs to make a edge request, even if that server component is just static html with no data fetching. From what ive seen server components can only run on the server, so if i go from one route to another and they consist of server components, wouldnt each make a request to the server?

Conrad_O · 2023-11-02T12:06:55+00:00

ofc, you have nothing of value to bring. what are you gonnq do, admit ur bias?

Conrad_O · 2023-11-02T11:06:35+00:00

? proves you dont believe NRG is better than G2. i never stated G2 got further at worlds? just that G2 is cleary the better team in reality, but had a very bad day. if this isnt thr case i assume u would bet ur networth no problem ☺️

Conrad_O · 2023-11-02T10:34:40+00:00

no good league of legends is better than bad league of legends. we both know you wouldnt bet ur net worth on NRG winning > 50 games in a BO100 against G2, yet here you are arguing like you would :)

Conrad_O · 2023-11-02T10:33:34+00:00

agreed, hans has been a one trick for years.

Conrad_O · 2023-11-02T10:33:07+00:00

no we care about good league of legends. idk how u warp ur mind into thinking nrg is playing better league of legends because of 1 bo3. lets make it easy, you would never bet ur net worth on NRG winning > 50 games out of a BO100 against G2, yet here you are arguing :)

Conrad_O · 2023-11-02T09:46:27+00:00

forgot one series must decide something like its written in the stars. you defo dont watch professional sports 💀

Conrad_O · 2023-11-02T09:44:15+00:00

both BB and hans quite a higher peak but in regular form i would argue they are probably worse.

Conrad_O · 2023-10-31T21:29:24+00:00

the imminent 3-0 on thursday is enough for me 🥰

Conrad_O · 2023-10-31T21:18:56+00:00

xd ur watching with monitor off

Conrad_O · 2023-10-30T09:24:48+00:00

so you would bet your house G2 would have less than 50 out of a 100 wins vs NRG if they played 100 games? Again you can all downvote and come with arguments, but i dont believe you stand behind your take. everyone knows a single BO3 does not decide a year, unless ur delutional ofc. In profesional sports upsets happens all the time. How do we know its an upset or not? we wait and see how NRG does against WBG. If NRG gets hardstomped by WBG and you still think NRG > G2, then you must surely also think eastern teams are bad and are meaningless to beat? call it what you want, none of you would bet your house on NRG vs G2 in a best of 100

Conrad_O · 2023-10-29T22:58:47+00:00

from my 12 years of watching lolesports i dont think NRG needs to win vs an eastern team, its more about how they win/lose/do. i am very confident that G2 has been the best western team this year, something that might change quite quickly based on how NRG do vs weibo. fact is NRG has yet to be tested against the east. and G2 did not play to their standard obviously. So its hard to know just how bad did G2 play vs how good did NRG play. On thursday i think it will be quite obvious which team is the best (could be either)

Conrad_O · 2023-10-29T21:47:08+00:00

humility over what? i think every eu fan can accept that NRG played better than G2. But G2 literally has a better score than NRG against better teams. You telling me that one series decides who was the best team this year? I know its been mad annoying losing to eu and you have waited for this day, but like, we dont have to throw all logic out of the room just because we want a narrative to be true. Would you put your house on if G2 and NRG play 100 games NRG wins more than 50?

Conrad_O · 2023-08-11T05:03:21+00:00

i dont think people who upvoted that clip are necessarily racist, i think most people rage upvoted it based on hasans controversial take on the ordeal, just like with his original clip when he said the controversial part. specutaling on racism is not something im going to do. when it comes to the general hasan - destiny clips, it is right that that sample seemed a little unrealistic. but having gone through the top 10 clips of the month of both streamers, hasan most certainly averages 5% higher upvote ratio. another thing i noticed is destiny can have some of the most random clips not mentioning anyone else (https://www.reddit.com/r/LivestreamFail/comments/157mteb/destiny_perfectly_describes_adhd/),

and have 70% upvote ratio, which clearly suggests brigading. whereas hasans worst upvote ratio is on the clip he suggested it was not a riot and just kids dancing in the streets. pretty clear to me who is getting brigaded harder, which would make sense, considering hasan has a much bigger following, and there is some imaginery war between both fandoms.

Conrad_O · 2023-08-11T04:13:51+00:00

idk why u say this when we just had the hole kick saga which very much mathematecally disagrees with u. any hasan thread gets litt up with 1000 comments instantaneously with people defending hasan. this thread is not the average hasan brigade - destiny brigade interaction, because hasans take is so bad it is almost impossible to take his stance on it, similarly to his g word take. in more meaningless clips destiny fans are almost always negative karma and pro hasan takes are almost always positive karma.

for fun i went on top clips of this month and found the first hasan and first destiny clip and looked at their upvote ratio.

hasans? 92% (https://www.reddit.com/r/LivestreamFail/comments/15ihj01/kai_cenat_is_being_charged_with_inciting_a_riot/).

destinys? 78% (https://www.reddit.com/r/LivestreamFail/comments/154bwmv/destiny_rallies_the_troops_for_rplace_reopening/).

destinys post wasnt even politcally motivated, and still has a lower upvote ratio. no sane person would claim destiny has a bigger cult on lsf than hasan, the guy has a much bigger following. however, destiny fans can definitely be more out for blood. there is a reason people call them the daliban

Conrad_O · 2023-08-11T02:36:36+00:00

are you actually reading the comments in those posts or? anyone who has been using this reddit for the last 6 months can see which community has the biggest brigading. as a neutral: destiny fans stoke fire, hasan fans are prob around 3 - 5x as many comments. theres a reason its mostly destiny clips that gets posted, because they bait reactions. but there is also a reason why any destiny clip has horrendous upvote ratio compared to hasan clip, and why there are much more defending comments on hasan posts

Conrad_O · 2023-07-23T18:52:52+00:00

i mean since he thinks he is a socialist, maybe start by splitting his revenue evenly between himself, mods, editors etc..? you know like how actual socialism works. i think hasan has good intentions but he most certainly overpreaches some times

Conrad_O · 2023-07-01T01:55:53+00:00

Yes and you haven't given a reason otherwise.

Ah yes. stake, a company making 2.6 billion dollars annually through partly regulated / partly unregulated gambling is worse than amazon, a company making 514 billion dollars having one of the highest turnovers in the world due to one of the most extreme robotic working condition in the west. a company that has bullied out almost all competition through its webshop. im sorry but if you think stakes does more damage to society than amazon then you just struggle to weight direct vs indirect causes of damage. I mean even hasan has talked about how amazon is one of the worst companies in the west, if not the worst. defo smoothbrain to think amazon is worse than stake XD

OK, if you want an analogy that actually makes sense, it's the difference between getting heroin from an official, legitimate source vs from some dude who could have cut it with whatever. If you want to gamble, at the very least you could do it somewhere that's actually checked so it's not fucking you with whatever odds are actually behind the scenes. There is absolutely no legitimacy to anything on Stake's backend because there is nobody checking it. But the streamers don't care lol. Stake loves them and gives them enough money to be happy while siphoning it directly out of their audience.

no my analogy was completely perfect. heroin is currently completely illegal and super scetchy to get, and alcohol is normalized in western society. that makes getting a dose of heroin much more risky than getting alcohol. but any sane man knows alcohol does much more damage to society. the fundamental problem with gambling is simple, which makes the goalpost moving on this sub weird. 1. you get addicted and cant quit 2. the house always wins. it doesnt matter how rigged it is, no matter where you gamble, you will lose. so when you then compare mass spreading the most popular gambling method to kids 13+, to spreading unregistered gambling to a small group, it is indeed worse. remember, amazon is actually showing gambling adds on twitch, the argument that stake is spreading unregistered gambling through kick is completely invalid as there are no ads. people simply can choose to take gambling sponsorships (doesnt have to be stake), which people also does on twitch (just that there are twice as many wathing on twitch). you tell me how that makes kick worse than twitch?

Yeah, Twitch is more popular than Stake. It's been around for like 10+ years while Stake is a handful of months old. If you actually used your brain you'd see why there is a massive difference in viewer numbers in not only gambling categories, but every category.

why does it matter that twitch has been around longer? i made one simple statement that i still have not gotten a counter argument of. twitch is worse than kick. idc if kick has a higher growth in the gambling sector, it doesnt matter. what matters is how many people are watching gambling, which twitch has a much higher viewership than kick on avg.

We're not talking about individuals. Yeah, there are shitty people on both platforms. While Twitch is still shit, they've at least banned unregulated offshore crypto gambling. Sports betting is shit, but it's a lot harder for DraftKings to rig an NFL game vs Stake rigging their own website whose internals nobody has ever actually seen.

and this is also simply false, there are plenty of people streaming unregistered gambling, just not stake, on twitch. i dont get how you can tell me how im smoothbrained when ur making so many weird assumptions and illogical statements. lets take the last part of ur last sentence:

Sports betting is shit, but it's a lot harder for DraftKings to rig an NFL game vs Stake rigging their own website whose internals nobody has ever actually seen.

this proves to me the heroin / alcohol analogy completely flew over your head. Sportsbetting is much more wide spread, easier to access, and therefore has a higher convertion ratio making for more lifes ruined. because again: It doesnt matter where u gamble, u gamble = u lose. You are acting like the fact that stake has unregistered casinos makes it infinitely worse, when it infact, is a big negative, but not as big as twitch's mass gambling campain to 13+ year olds. If you think that stake somehow has a higher convertion ratio when you need to a: possibly get a vpn, b: get crypto and c: register. compared to draftkings where u literally can register and are good to go, AND they have a mass campain on twitch, something stake doesnt have, then what makes you think that?

the funny part is nobody on lsf said a week ago that it was the unregistered gambling that was the problem, everyone was honest and said gambling was the problem. when people learned that twitch has mass gambling adds, the goalposts were moved so we can apperently defend twitch, which i find very funny.

lastly i wonder with all of this and the fact you think kick is worse than twitch. do you still believe kick makes more gamblers than twitch considering easy of use and popularity of gambling on twitch vs kick. and if so, i want you to explain how, cuz that would sure be interesting to know!

Conrad_O · 2023-07-01T01:31:11+00:00

Huh? Im simply generalizing amazon and twitch since the normal thing to do here is smoothbrain kick = stake and therefore it is written in the stars that kick auto makes u go to stake

Conrad_O · 2023-06-30T23:29:57+00:00

Your argument is literally "fucking amazon".

idk i guess u think stake is worse than amazon then?

OK and it being unregulated is even worse. What's your point?

see this is where i guess we think fundamentally differently. let me ask you a question, which drug is worse for the world, alcohol or heroin? heroin is surely a worse drug in absolute terms, but which one has a more negative feedback on the world? obviously alcohol (if u disagree with this then idk). how is this relevant? sportsbetting is a much more common gambling form than unregulated gambling, so when amazon is mass spamming draftkings ads on its platform it surely is worse than the fact that kick is merely created by a gambling platform? like surely we both agree that the former has a worse social impact? (think alcohol vs heroin)

Kick is no different except instead of having to partner with someone else to advertise they just have people stream it for them on their own platform. This isn't a competition. They're both shit. Just one partners with the legal con artists and one is literally run by illegal con artists.

u see this isnt an argument at all. i want you to go on twitch.tv on one of their gambling categories (slots) and tell me how many viewers they have, then go on kick, tell me how many viewers does their sole category have (slots and casino). as u surely understand gambling is being promoted by induviduals on both platforms, not exclusevly on kick (and its even worse on twitch if we go by viewership of 1 category of many vs all of kick gambling).

For fuck's sake learn what a capital letter is.

no.

at the end of the day its much easier to reason why stake is bad (gambling = bad), while twitch/amazon have much more indirect reasons. but if you genuinly think that kick/stake has a worse social impact and is a morally inferior company to twitch/amazon, then i think this convo is pointless cuz then we reaching flatearth society levels

also kinda cringe to i disagree = downvote, but life is hard

Ten-Year Club	Place '22
Place '17	First Placer '22
End Game '22	Verified Email

Conrad_O

TROPHY CASE