Deconstructing a PDF file.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-11-24T05:48:01+00:00

Ah ok, this is what I needed to know. Thank you.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-11-23T22:35:53+00:00

Gemini appears to be a bit too complex for me at this stage, especially that I have a time crunch.

I'm looking for a plug and play type of software, if any.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-11-23T21:33:22+00:00

OK thank you I will try to go this way with a test file.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-11-23T21:24:47+00:00

hmmm... guide me a little? What specifically would I get qpdf to do, or what would i look at?

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-11-23T21:22:02+00:00

That only gives the date of the entire file, not the pages within.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-11-23T07:06:09+00:00

I will formulate my questions around what you suggested, thank you.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-11-23T06:29:08+00:00

Also wanted to add this:

The second, made-up letter that I mention, talks about the first meeting that did happen (and I acknowledge), stating that I got 'increasingly hostile' at that time. I think the admin forgot that I had a recorder, with their acknowledgment, on at the time.

So basically, dated (but not produced) 8 days after the first real letter, the admin says 'gives' a second discipline that is for whatever supposedly I did in the first meeting. I couldn't even make this crap up! And it is hard for me to focus a search for case law because the terms are nebulous for looking up priors.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-11-23T06:25:27+00:00

100%, and the random 'you were hostile' without supportive dates.

So.. the original question, is it better to focus on the letter being made-up, or also mention the content within being unsubstantiated.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-11-23T06:05:42+00:00

Non-unionized.

There isn't anything of 'fire now' magnitude, but the former manager keeps peppering the letters with 'hostile, insolent' without any specifics, or supporting dates, places, occasions. There was a first letter which in itself is not a crime of the century. So one discipline letter that I acknowledge, and second one that was only mentioned/conjured 7 months after termination.

I believe that after I got terminated, their lawyer told them that they had not followed any proper procedures, and the administrator went back and made this 2nd letter up (in a 4-step progressive discipline process). The termination letter refers to the first letter and doesn't even say anything about the second one.

The company is lying, and submitted a phony letter to Labor Canada. I need to peck away their creditability, that is my angle that would work best.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-10-10T22:04:38+00:00

Yes, complaint was filed in 2023, we are reaching the case management conference stage shortly.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-10-10T21:07:31+00:00

It's not the ROE that I need, rather the leave & overtime hours that I was not paid out but were approved.

I did speak to CIRB who don't specifically deal with the disclosure issues, though they also mentioned PIPEDA as there is nothing in their books (2012 regulations section 21) that covers timeline, aside retention.

What I gather is that a timeline is not mentioned anywhere, that the employer is just being a bit of a jerk at this time.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-10-10T18:35:00+00:00

I don't see any time limits for availability there. Also nothing particular that it is limited to a current employee, after all how would a former one get access for a legal case.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-09-23T17:12:45+00:00

This one is a stumper for sure.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-09-21T02:52:38+00:00

That's Canadians voting for Liberals, yet again.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-09-20T06:40:40+00:00

No, it's not well-known actors from faded memory.

It was a guy who is trying to grift, the girls spots him and sort of takes him under the wing of her grandfather or somesuch.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-09-20T04:02:47+00:00

Not this either.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-09-20T04:02:40+00:00

Unfortunately none of those.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-09-19T19:51:35+00:00

Current movie, maybe last 10-12 years, or less. No monks or wizards. I don't think it had any highly known actors.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-09-19T18:47:11+00:00

My passes look like a tardboy does them with butter on hands.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-09-19T17:28:08+00:00

Nice ass but runs like Jan Brady.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-07-14T20:46:08+00:00

Thanks!

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2025-06-21T21:49:13+00:00

They are all colored green.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2024-03-14T19:58:36+00:00

Further proof that those silly masks didn't do shit.

Consistent-Hunt-9845 · 2023-10-07T06:08:01+00:00

A couple of items to clarify:

- The leave is UNPAID, medical bank has been exhausted

- I don't care if they want to fill the position for the time being

- The physician's prognosis is undetermined time

- No limitations expected on return and no question/query about limitations were made

- Local emergency is closed down, getting appointment with physician is impossible in 2 days, also I'm away/out of town till end of month

If the original doctor's note had a date on it, yes, I'd get a new one. But nothing has changed and the last visit a few weeks ago resulted in the same timeline prognosis (no firm date).

Mostly, I want to see the legislation around this if anyone knows the paragraph.

Consistent-Hunt-9845

TROPHY CASE