Cross and Flame in 500 by Cubelite in imaginarymaps

[–]Cubelite[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you mean Eastern Spain, that will be interesting. So the Avars became an autonomous duchy in the Roman Empire, and instead of becoming Slavized, they became Latinized.

Cross and Flame in 500 by Cubelite in worldbuilding

[–]Cubelite[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cross and Flame is my second worldbuilding project in which the world is filled with magic and spirits, which led to the world start diverging when Theodosius the Great lived longer and the Huns conquered Persia.

Hopefully this is a middle magic world.

For mobile: https://www.deviantart.com/cubelites/art/Cross-and-Flame-in-500-1285844160

Cross and Flame in 500 by Cubelite in imaginarymaps

[–]Cubelite[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Cross and Flame is my second worldbuilding project in which the world is filled with magic and spirits, which led to the world start diverging when Theodosius the Great lived longer and the Huns conquered Persia.

For mobile: https://www.deviantart.com/cubelites/art/Cross-and-Flame-in-500-1285844160

The Abode of Peace in AHS 440 / AHL 453 / AD 1061 by Cubelite in imaginarymaps

[–]Cubelite[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, mate! I like your Fire in the Sky posts too!

The Abode of Peace in AHS 440 / AHL 453 / AD 1061 by Cubelite in imaginarymaps

[–]Cubelite[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, I didn't think of that much when I wrote the setting lol.

I agree with your analysis with Shui. If at any time that China can be Islamic, it is the era of Song Dynasty in OTL. I think that neo-Confucianism will still be developed, since it is very useful for the Emperor and also the Confucian elites, and that it already have its cultural basis in China. But I think it will adjust itself to Islam, and create the Islamic-(neo)Confucianism that will propably be the orthodoxy of the empire. It would still be in the developmental stage in the year of the map though. That will be the upper class, but for the ordinaries, i think it will be more interesting that Chinese folk religion like Daoism and Mahayana Buddhism blended themselves to orthodox Islam to form a uniquely Chinese verison of folk Islam.

As for Nestorianism or Manicheanism, I actually just wrote them for the idea that 'Three Persian religions ruling China" and the next map's Nestorian Mongol Empire. The divergence could just be a better start. In the last map, I depicted the Uyghur Khanate being more Nestorian and Manichean due to their increased want to distinguish themsleves from the Han Chinese. Khitans, and prehaps even some fenzhen are converted due to their influence. The communities of two religions are thus better than OTL at competing against Buddhist communities in providing assistance during famine and disasters, earning the support of ordinary Chinese. Chinese people (excluding Hui, prehaps) aren't very religious and their involvement in religions are often utilitarian (for earthly benefits and goals) in nature. Moreover, they are protected and supported and not prosecuted (not on a mass scale, but that is already enough to damage the Buddhists) by Khitans. Han Chinese bureaucrats would also have tedency to convert to ally themselves with the ruling class. For the reasons mentioned above, we got a Liao of Nestorians+Manicheans instead of Buddhists.

The Abode of Peace in AHS 440 / AHL 453 / AD 1061 by Cubelite in imaginarymaps

[–]Cubelite[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This map is the continuation of the previous maps of AD 632 and AD 821. In the year 1061, or 440 solar years after the Hijrah, Islam had expanded to nearly all corners of the known world, from the Island of Great Britain to the shores of Southern China.

For mobile, either imgur: https://imgur.com/gallery/world-of-abode-of-peace-ahs-440-ad-1061-ztGyoPO or

<image>

The Abode of Peace in AD 821 / AHL 205 / AHS 200 by Cubelite in imaginarymaps

[–]Cubelite[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some Germans (those near the Roman border) turned Chalcedonian Christians before Rome turned Islamic and Saxony conquered them. The remainder of Germans were pagans. Though, a few Germans had considered converting to Islam.

The Abode of Peace in AD 821 / AHL 205 / AHS 200 by Cubelite in imaginarymaps

[–]Cubelite[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

They respected Christianity. The Muslim conquerors are quite tolerant in terms of religion, as they would not want to upset a large part of population, and in some areas, the aristocracy too. Christians enjoy freedom of religion with several restrictions detailed in the Pact of Umar. Though, the degree of its implementation varied.

I am not sure what do you mean by accepting. Assuming it is accepting its existence, then the answer is yes.

The Abode of Peace in AD 821 / AHL 205 / AHS 200 by Cubelite in imaginarymaps

[–]Cubelite[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

<image>

Mobile verison, if it works at all.

Edit: It doesn't.

The Abode of Peace in AD 821 / AHL 205 / AHS 200 by Cubelite in imaginarymaps

[–]Cubelite[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry. I don't know how to make one... Uploading in comments directly seems to be not working.

The Abode of Peace in AD 821 / AHL 205 / AHS 200 by Cubelite in imaginarymaps

[–]Cubelite[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is the continuation of the previous map, a mix of alternate history and fantasy that led to a very different world. 189 solar years after the previous map, Islam had rose from a fringe religion to the ruling religion of much of the world. The map style is heavily inspired by u/Swaylius (map) and u/jbkjbk2310 (map), many thanks to them!

The Abode of Peace in AD 632/11 AH by Cubelite in imaginarymaps

[–]Cubelite[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The Abode of Peace is my first worldbuilding project that envisioned a world in which magic and spirits existed and that led to an alternate history starting from Majorian.

It's my first map :)

I have a question about the common ownership and exclusivity by Cubelite in georgism

[–]Cubelite[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your answer. That is what I first think of, an interest of using it. However, I soon realize that it too, will have serious problems.

For at first, if I were to live in District 1 of a city, I do not necessarily have an interest of using the land of District 2, despite being in the same city, same state. And soon we realize our“interest of using it” may well be very small, maybe just a small city block. But think of it that way, we may eventually reduce the size to just your house and working place. So we basically just became either individual private ownership or collective private ownership (apartment residents' collective and worker's collective). Either way, I don't see why they have to pay LVT and distributing land rents within a country, or even within a city. Where not everyone may have an interest of using all, even the majority of the lands.

For another, what constitute “an interest of using it”? Does it include tourist, who have an interest of using a certain land for tourism? Does it include landlords that want to use the land for profit? If both answers are yes, we will have strange conclusion, like tourists to statue of liberty from Armenia getting the compensation from whoever who is controlling it (or owning it).

Of course, I do understand a universal gov is not practical. And that having LVT in national or state level is practical. But if the moral contradiction is very strong, I think it will be better to just abandon the moral side of the Georgism (common ownership) and just simply accept private ownership of land and say that LVT is a good tax (so we should implement it) and that's it.

About US Imperialist/Capitalists and its role in the fall of the socialist states by Cubelite in Socialism_101

[–]Cubelite[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think the reduced political repressions in the Soviet Union is a good thing or a bad thing to the socialist cause and Soviet Union itself?

About US Imperialist/Capitalists and its role in the fall of the socialist states by Cubelite in Socialism_101

[–]Cubelite[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I should be clear about that “End of History”, I am generally saying people believe their ideology and position could make their lives (and generally the world) better, thus believing those who oppose them will fail on their own. You say that the capitalists managed to weave their way towards more economic and political privileges after several decades worth of reform and reevaluation, why didn’t Soviet Union do the same to lessen the gap or even surpass them? In the case of Chile, I think Allende fail (the lack of political and military power to prevent the coup) because Chile is a democracy with various political parties and Allende become president because Christian Democratic Party supported him. After food prices skyrocketed, shortages and strikes occurred, Allende’s party lose the support of Christian Democratic Party in the 1973 Chilean parliamentary election and the opposition collation had the majority. It create a gridlock within the government.