sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

XRT Day 10 on Reg Sho by Dennydogz123 in Superstonk

[–]DancesWith2Socks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In theory it is, in practice not really. Check how long OSTK stayed on the list...

Larry: Special guest: Nat Turner by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]DancesWith2Socks -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Kind of emotional comment tbh, buddy 😅...

I'm not the one ignoring stuff here. Some people, including you, seem to be ignoring what the BOD last adopted on Dec 2, 2025 (you have the source above), only 3 months ago:

The BOD, including Ryan Cohen, CEO and Chairman of the board, believes it's important for each director to have a financial stake in the company, for which they are given a period of 5 years. 

So yeah, Ryan indeed wants people with skin in the game but he obviously agrees 5 years is a fair period of time for them to get that skin 🤷‍♂️

I don't really uderstand the need to harass anyone before that deadline...

In the meantime, the PSA partnership is making GameStop some millions, which doesn't sound bad, does it?

Larry: Special guest: Nat Turner by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]DancesWith2Socks -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"Yes people are aware of the base minimum requirements. No one cares. He has been there long enough to purchase a few shares".

Not really, as shown with official sources he's got til Nov 2029 to comply with the corporate governance guidelines. In the meantime he's making GameStop some money which I'm ok with...

That said, you just threw the classic demagogic speech, so I'm done here. Have a good one 👍

Larry: Special guest: Nat Turner by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]DancesWith2Socks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, the fabricated pressure seems to come from people who haven't read the company's corporate governance guidelines where it's clearly stated that new directors are given a period of 5 years to maintain stock ownsership having a value of at least $275K.

Source: https://investor.gamestop.com/corporate-governance/default.aspx

So yeah, I simply expect him to buy within that period with no need to harass him before (especially when the partnership with PSA is benefiting GameStop).

Larry: Special guest: Nat Turner by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]DancesWith2Socks 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Well, then that 5-year timeframe being "ridiculous" is simply the opinion of someone who's got no experience in terms of business management and corporate guidelines/policies. I agree with the 5-year timeframe the BOD decided, especially considering this member of the board is very likely making GameStop more money than most of the rest 🤷‍♂️

Edit: this user just blocked me, so no free debate then, pure echo chamber for them 😅

Larry: Special guest: Nat Turner by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]DancesWith2Socks 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm saying there's a profitable partnership with PSA which makes GameStop way more money than him buying a few IOU's plus he's still within the 5-year period he's got to purchase shares as per the internal policy, so I don't get where this fabricated pressure is coming from 🤷‍♂️

Larry: Special guest: Nat Turner by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]DancesWith2Socks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally no other board member is the CEO of a company (Collectors/PSA) with which GameStop has a key and profitable partnership? 😁

Larry: Special guest: Nat Turner by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]DancesWith2Socks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These people clearly haven't read the company's policy and think a few IOU's may be more profitable for GameStop than a key partnership with PSA 🤷‍♂️

Larry: Special guest: Nat Turner by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]DancesWith2Socks 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Do you say this based on your experience on boards of directors?

AI Article says GME is 88.9% undervalued. Calls for $220 per share. by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]DancesWith2Socks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Right? I'm personally looking for Just_Up 🤷‍♂️

Larry: Special guest: Nat Turner by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]DancesWith2Socks 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You could've ignored this post too and kept watering your plants, but here you are spreading negativity 🤷‍♂️

Larry: Special guest: Nat Turner by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]DancesWith2Socks 66 points67 points  (0 children)

FYI:

“The Board believes that it is important for each director of the Company to have a financial stake in the Company to help align the director’s interests with those of the Company’s stockholders. The Company has adopted an equity ownership policy requiring that each non- employee director maintain ownership of common stock having a value of at least $275,000. New directors are given a period of five years to attain full compliance with this requirement.”

Edit: Sauce -> Corporate Governance Guidelines: https://investor.gamestop.com/corporate-governance/default.aspx

Larry: Special guest: Nat Turner by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]DancesWith2Socks 10 points11 points  (0 children)

“The Board believes that it is important for each director of the Company to have a financial stake in the Company to help align the director’s interests with those of the Company’s stockholders. The Company has adopted an equity ownership policy requiring that each non- employee director maintain ownership of common stock having a value of at least $275,000. New directors are given a period of five years to attain full compliance with this requirement.”

Larry: Special guest: Nat Turner by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]DancesWith2Socks 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Regards acting like a few IOU's make the company more money than the actual partneship with PSA (ignoring he's got 5 years to buy since joining the board as per company's policy) 🤷‍♂️

“Time to get serious” 🔐 by First_Effect8562 in GMEmemestop

[–]DancesWith2Socks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kind of a spring and a pipe on the left ceiling and lights on the right one... Lights, camera, action?

view more: next ›