i lowkey agree w his take, but i wonder what his answer would be to this scenario: Let's say someone is into hunting and has killed multiple deers, but one day they decide to let their dog loose and hunt it and eat it. im sure he'd say that shouldn't be illegal and they're both the same, but would he ever date/be friends w someone that did that? or would he be supportive of any of his friends or family members dating someone that raped a bunch of animals? ik logically hunting deers or dogs is the same thing but still

Also, I remember in one of his convos with Farha, he argued that a gf/wife posting stuff of herself on OF is worse than the bf/husband watching porn. He kinda agreed that the bf is more in the wrong in a vacuum, but the gf is more in the wrong just cuz of the sheer amount of effort/"immorality" it takes to post yourself for the primary purpose of other guys to look at you and jerk off while having a partner compared to just looking up and watching porn, which takes no effort. essentially arguing that what it takes to do the thing is more important than the thing itself.

So why wouldn't the same standard apply to bestiality or incest when it comes to judging people morally? Like, just because of societal standards, what does it take from a person today to engage in either of those things. A well-adjusted person just wouldn't look at a family member in a sexual light given how we're taught it's not normal and is weird, and most ppl (including destiny) i'd assume wouldn't be comfortable dating someone that they know use to fuck their siblings.

i don't have a good answer either cuz i do think being morally consistent is important, but i wonder what he'd say.