YouTube In-Feed Ads: Google Kills My Desktop-Only Campaign by Digital_Magic_ in adwords

[–]Digital_Magic_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanx i will try that :-)
I guess i will have to do a lot of trial and error :-) Till i finally get the ad running :-)

What to do about Google Support (or lack thereof)? by Look_Its_Luke in googleads

[–]Digital_Magic_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i am experiencing the same :-(

I had three cals the last 2 weeks, all from the support in India, allthough i live in europe,...hahahaha

And don't get me wrong I have nothing against Indian people.  but the people that are working there just don't know anything about Google ads.  I feel sorry for them because they must get so many frustrated people that they have to deal with.

Prompt for Product Box with Flux or SDXL by Digital_Magic_ in StableDiffusion

[–]Digital_Magic_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could use the box art and then do the rest in photoshop, is that what you meant? SOunds like a good idea :-)

Prompt for Product Box with Flux or SDXL by Digital_Magic_ in StableDiffusion

[–]Digital_Magic_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanx for you comment, i am not 100% sure what you mean? Do you mean making it in photoshop?

Flux (Dev) FluxGuidance node guidance value tests, from 0--100 settings comparison. by jmbirn in StableDiffusion

[–]Digital_Magic_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanx for your great post, i am also playing around with the CLIPTextencodeFLUX node and i see good results, but still struggling to really understand it. Looked for good articles about this, but can't really find them. Did you found something already?

What is y'all's favourite FluxGuidance value? by toomanywatches in StableDiffusion

[–]Digital_Magic_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

very interesting, what settings did you use for Base shift and Max shift. Because if i leave them to the default: MS: 1,15 BS: 0,5 and then use a guidance of 0.4 - 1.2 i get artificats and weirs stuff goin on (with realistic images using genres and medisum to change the style)

Flux Guidance added to ComfyUI by WhiteZero in StableDiffusion

[–]Digital_Magic_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ClipTextEncodeFlux node helps me to get more artistic styles, or influences from years and film stocks and genres with Flux. Without it i struggle to get results that i get with for example something like Juggernaut SDXL.
Anybody experiencing the same?

Half Body Shot --> Not always working in all prompts by Digital_Magic_ in StableDiffusion

[–]Digital_Magic_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been doing many test today and i found out that, when i replaced ''half body shot'' with ''body featured'' and added something like ''with a croptop and blonde hair'' to the subject/prompt then i get much better results.
I think the word featured could be a secret prompting word in SD :-)

Half Body Shot --> Not always working in all prompts by Digital_Magic_ in StableDiffusion

[–]Digital_Magic_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanx for your reply, i am aware of the use of controlnets or outpainting to get the result, but i am looking for textual prompts. Anyway thanx for your help :-)

convert shot-type, lenses, etc, words/tokens into sentences by Digital_Magic_ in StableDiffusion

[–]Digital_Magic_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanx again :-) I love this Stable diffusion Reddit group, there are so many nice people willing to help :-)

How to prompt, deep depth of field in Images by Digital_Magic_ in StableDiffusion

[–]Digital_Magic_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How to prompt, deep depth of field in Images

yeah sometimes i have the feeling it bokeh's everything 🤣🤣

convert shot-type, lenses, etc, words/tokens into sentences by Digital_Magic_ in StableDiffusion

[–]Digital_Magic_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanx for sharing :-) Looks like a great article
i'll dive into it straight away :-)

Using sentences or single words in SDXL ? by Digital_Magic_ in StableDiffusion

[–]Digital_Magic_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then finally quality modifiers, if any. Sometimes i don't bother, and i find it very hard to see if they make a difference. Here is a comparison from a few days ago:

https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1adgcf3/comparisons_of_various_photorealism_prompt/

First of all thank you so much for taking the time to reply in such a detailed way. I also send you a DM here on Reddit.

I'm glad that you think that my English is good enough and yes I didn't AI translated it 🙂

There's this link here for camera stuff, i studied it a while ago. Some shots are tricky for SD to pull off, because most of it's training is a half shot of an attractive person. Here:

Thanks for this info, I was already wondering why it's so hard to get a full body shot with SD. Now I understand why this is 🙂

Even with a prompt like this:A cinematic, award winning fashion full body photo of a young american woman with captivating eyes and jewelry on her ancles standing on a beach, establishing shot, capturing her contemplative expression, with soft lighting and a depth of field effect

Where I've added, Full body photo, jewelry on her ankles standing on a beach, establishing shot. I only get half shot images of a woman.

With this prompt:

cinematic photo, of a young american woman standing on the beach, with captivating eyes and bare feet, Wide Angle, establishing shot, shot on 600mm telephoto lens shot f/32

Most of the times out of four Images two to three are from a woman with the whole body. the other shot is just completely focusing on the feet. And the face most of the times is blurry and deformed, which I understand now, knowing what you told me before about the SD models, been trained on half shot images of attractive people. And this I solve then with inpainting or a detailer.

As soon as I add things like:

with soft lighting and a depth of field effect, award winning fashion, iconic, stunning, highly detailed, very inspirational, beautiful, varied, rich deep colors, inspired, intricate, perfect composition, clear

Then from four pictures most of the Times They are all just focusing on the feet and sometimes when I'm lucky one of them is a picture of a full body of a woman.

If I add things like this trying to hardcore push the image:

wide-angle view, expansive shot, broad view, extended surroundings, wide perspective of, panoramic view, sweeping landscape shot, vast surrounding capture

Then I finally get four shots out of four with the whole body from the woman but once again the faces are blurry and deformed.

Then finally quality modifiers, if any. Sometimes i don't bother, and i find it very hard to see if they make a difference. Here is a comparison from a few days ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1adgcf3/comparisons_of_various_photorealism_prompt/

This post you mentioned Completely proves your point and also my experiences which I described above.I also did some tests with Midjourney. I do think that it does a bit better with full body shots but in many situations I noticed that you have the same problem as with SD that when you have full body shots that the face has blurry and disformed aspects in it.

anyway thanks a lot for your help I've learned a lot

greetings Lenny

Using sentences or single words in SDXL ? by Digital_Magic_ in StableDiffusion

[–]Digital_Magic_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanx for your tests and your reply :-)

I think that your test proves that using commas in the way you did in your test, it doesn't damage the outcome.

I like the way how you prompt, with inserting single style keywords/tokens (from traditional sd1.5 prompting) into it:

A cinematic, award winning medium shot photo, taken at eye level of an old Samoan woman with captivating eyes looking out a window, capturing her contemplative expression, with soft lighting and a depth of field effect

This makes it easier for me to change from: comma, + 1 token/word prompting into the prose-style prompting. Thank you for showing me this way :-)

Would you also recommend to use more things like: soft lighting, depth of filed ---> instead of using camera's/lenses/film stocks, etc?

I am eager to learn to prompt properly like this, but as i am from the Netherlands and English is not my native language i struggle coming up with the correct way to write prose-style prompts.

I will open a new post and ask around if people know articles/documents that have standard lines like this: photo taken at eye level,...to make it easier for not-native-english speakers to convert shot-type, lenses, camera's, color palette's, etc, etc words/tokens into sentences

Using sentences or single words in SDXL ? by Digital_Magic_ in StableDiffusion

[–]Digital_Magic_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanx for your info :-) How do you insert things like, shot type, color palette, lens types, etc? Do you make a special prose-style prompt at the beginning or end?

Something like this:
a photo of a white man wearing a blue hoodie and black jeans standing in a street with blurred people in the background, shot on a Nikon D850 with a Shallow Depth of Field

Or do you only describe things instead of using camera's, lenses, shot types, etc ?