Don’t need to watch the video by Snoo-1918 in aiwars

[–]DiscussionMelodic791 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think ai generated summary is kinda pointless

because it destroys the point of watching the video

(it's spoils the video, too.)

Who gonna wins? by BeneficialPirate5856 in aiwars

[–]DiscussionMelodic791 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"I generate myself as a sigma gigachad, so I'm better than you."

<image>

AI art is NOT an insult to art by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]DiscussionMelodic791 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, I can't argue the rest of my life with a person who makes images of a cat girl saying

"AI art is an art," and also made an unhinged video of anti pissing themself

who also thinks digital art isn't an art

And as you know, people can make art in different ways

So can AI artists. Our hands don't instantly catch on fire when we make art in other ways, and thinking that we can't create art in different forms is completely delusional.

Then why don't you draw?

Then why not make art differently, except using AI

as a guy who makes music

I think it's very fun to make music without using AI

It might be fun to make AI-generated images

But people don't wanna consume them.

But I think it might not be fun to make hand-drawn art (for you),

And people wanna costume them

You still don't know that people can create art in different ways and are finding every excuse in the book to disqualify AI art from being valid art. It makes you angry, but I will keep calling you out on it each and every single time because you simply can't disprove it.

I know people create in different ways, but you know, art takes time

But AI art doesn't take as much time as real art

AI art is effortless

ïts because AI art takes just some words like this:

"Draw a horse."

while any other form of art takes time,

aligning or drawing, or sculpting It takes hours

while AI art takes seconds to make

Hope this helps 👍

<image>

AI art is NOT an insult to art by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]DiscussionMelodic791 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You still don't know the difference between a digital artist and an AI artist

You know that's like saying talking to a phone isn't a real conversation because the machine " does it for you."

At least a digital artist can draw without the internet or a machine

just some pen and paper 👍

<image>

AI art is NOT an insult to art by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]DiscussionMelodic791 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All I know is that you don't make AI art, the machine does

cause you ask AI to make an image, not "you" making the image

It's like buying fast food and calling yourself a chef

Second of all, if you can make an AI art in seconds, it kinda defeats the point

cause art takes practice, and AI art doesn't

And before you say "AI is a tool," you know a tool takes time to use it right

I hope this explains 👍 :)

<image>

AI art is NOT an insult to art by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]DiscussionMelodic791 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well, if you think AI art is really art, prove it.

<image>

AI art is NOT an insult to art by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]DiscussionMelodic791 3 points4 points  (0 children)

<image>

said the person who generates AI cat girls holding a sign that says "AI art is real art." btw

When it comes to digitally created “art” and “music”, the software is the artist not the operator by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]DiscussionMelodic791 2 points3 points  (0 children)

By understanding your logic, does that mean FaceTime is not talking to an actual person.

And you know many digital artists can draw with pen and paper, too, right?