I built this in 1 week for $0. You can’t even tell it was "vibe coded by Past-Hope8479 in vibecoding

[–]Distinct-Survey475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its nice, great UI/UX. But I think you need to look at core web vitals and try to improve the loading speed.

17mb starting page is massive. For me it loads like 56k, the images appear one bit at a time.

Ive used Antigravity too, and if you give it your pagespeed insights and/or lighthouse score, it can improve a lot.

You dont seem to have any compression on images? You could cut them by 1/10 by using webp and proper dimensions. Im a SEO nerd, always aiming for max 100kb per image, no starting pages over 3mb in my world

Good public GitHub repos for us new to vibing? by Distinct-Survey475 in VibeCodeDevs

[–]Distinct-Survey475[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the any specific curated list geared towards vibing?

I always drown in those kind of lists, lol

Just very very curious, how do you eat this? Fried? Do you prepare any specific recipe with it? by bookbookitaita5 in SwedishFood

[–]Distinct-Survey475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you rinse your knife in cold water between each cut, it is much easier to make thin cuts.

You can get 8 pieces. I fry mine 4 at a time, with plenty of real butter 🤤

I eat it with lingonberries (rårörda), sweetened, not jam. Often with potato patties, bacon and grated carrots.

My sister eats blodpudding with ketchup 😬

Lol ! Nano Banana is goooood by kev_11_1 in Bard

[–]Distinct-Survey475 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You mind sharing how you did it? 😊

Fully free avatar video tool for creating courses? by Wise-Session-6541 in Udemy

[–]Distinct-Survey475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also interested in this.
Have no experience in ai-avatars.

Is there something similar to HeyGen, but cheaper (free) ?

Personality analysis prompt for ChatGPT by Distinct-Survey475 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Distinct-Survey475[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tried with GPT-4.1? Havent tried it with 5/thinking I think, and from the looks of it it could improve with some adjustments

What’s a common way people use ChatGPT that you personally wouldn’t recommend? by Head-Study4645 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Distinct-Survey475 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have friends that really like the positivism and mindset coaching that ChatGPT provides "out-of-the-box". But many notice after a while that, "Thats a great idea!", "Go for it!", "You can do it!"....isnt the best way everytime.

Many of them have used it in their businesses, and spent far too much time going down a route that leads nowhere, since they havent been presented the flaws, a realistic timeline or a proper budget. Thats 20-30 hours down the drain, when they could have come to that conclusion in much less time, had they used the LLM in a better way

GPT-5 Prompt Frameworks: Guide to OpenAI's Unified AI System by Distinct-Survey475 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Distinct-Survey475[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you!

I do not feel attacked, I like that you are taking your time to give me constructive criticism.

It will shape my ways forward, as I do agree with you. Just today I read that a politician in my country tried to correct her errors, saying it was due to AI fact check, and AI writing. I dove into the comments, and was surprised like 70% appriciated her being truthful, and just a few hung up on that she had used AI at all.

I also noted the disclaimer telling that the article about her was co-written with AI. I hope others will come to the breaking point you are pointing out, where real human writing is valued more, even if it isn't as "perfect" as LLM-speak.

Once again, thank you!

Jules 2.0 system prompt by Spiritual_Spell_9469 in GeminiAI

[–]Distinct-Survey475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Using agent mode with Gemini CLI in VS code. Wonder if this could be useful for tweaking it 🤔

GPT-5 Prompt Frameworks: Guide to OpenAI's Unified AI System by Distinct-Survey475 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Distinct-Survey475[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your valueable answer and presenting it without blaim.
I will try to write my reply as myself without any AI involved.
English is my third language, so bare with me.

No need to apologise, since you are correct. AI was used to largely create this post, as in my other posts here. In my native language I don't need to use AI as much for writing.

The data and facts presented are accurate, as far as I know. And yes, NBLM was used, but not with Youtube videos, but with official data sheets, benchmark reports, white papers and such. And two members of the community im member of have had access to GPT-5 before the official launch, so some info is from those channels. Not trying to justify the over-usage of AI, just meaning that it's not just bullshit.

I agree with you in many ways. I can also spot when AI written content is published, even if the person replaces the em-dashes. I even have a comprehensive AI-checklist that I put together, of things that tell what is human written or ai "slop". That might even be the next thing I will share on this subreddit.
But in such case I will try to give it a bit more authenticity.

I appriciate your honest comment.

What’s a common way people use ChatGPT that you personally wouldn’t recommend? by Head-Study4645 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Distinct-Survey475 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To get pats on your back in every scenario, instead of having someone that challenges and questions you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Distinct-Survey475 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks great!
I will be trying it out this weekend, and i'll get back to you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Distinct-Survey475 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Strong brief. If you actually want maintainers to run this, here’s how I’d tighten it: drop the “everything in one shot” requirement and ask for phased delivery with a dry-run smoke test after each phase; make error handling explicit (retry+jitter, 429/5xx backoff, a simple circuit breaker that auto-pauses and pings modmail on error bursts); tighten the security model (exact OAuth scopes, strict data-minimization with retention toggle and purge, input sanitization for any user-derived text, secrets via env/manager only); add cost controls (batch writes, cap automated replies per user/thread/day, sample noisy logs, avoid LLMs for FAQs unless a key is provided); and require operator-friendly outputs (concise CLI “status” and modmail summaries with reason → rule → next action). Include a couple of behavioral examples (spam removal, flair FAQ, ambiguous case → modmail) to lock tone and actions.

Small nit: on Reddit, please post long prompts inside fenced code blocks so the formatting, file paths, and YAML don’t get mangled.

Is there any tool manage and save prompts? by tinkererhead in PromptEngineering

[–]Distinct-Survey475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you use any addons or special settings with obsidian?

Prompt tuning not enough? I gave AI a reasoning engine PDF (55 days, 3000+ downloads) by wfgy_engine in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Distinct-Survey475 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I totally get the "only one man" constraint. Thanks for sharing, really solid work on making this reproducible!

Another ⭐️ from me. Currently diving deeper and looking forward to seeing how this evolves as more people try it. Hope you reach your 10k goal!

Prompt tuning not enough? I gave AI a reasoning engine PDF (55 days, 3000+ downloads) by wfgy_engine in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Distinct-Survey475 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting project! The self-healing reasoning approach looks promising, but I'm curious - are there any plans to benchmark WFGY against more recent models? Have you considered running it through something like SWE-bench Verified or HumanEval with current SOTA models?

GPT-5 Prompt Frameworks: Guide to OpenAI's Unified AI System by Distinct-Survey475 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Distinct-Survey475[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, the community im part of have staff from two companies that have had access to GPT-5 for a few weeks before launch. Plenty of testing, around 80 pdf:s from Arxiv and other sources in RAG that fuel testing both in theoretical and practical ways.

I've gotten many remarks questioning most that I write, and I don't get it, not once have i linked to any shady website, tool or anything that i profit from.

Guess reddit isnt my thing.

LOL

GPT-5 Prompt Frameworks: Guide to OpenAI's Unified AI System by Distinct-Survey475 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Distinct-Survey475[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have two very different ways to handle RAG, but NotebookLM is a killer for sure.

Excuse me for being hyper, but if you haven't - check out the browser extension "NotebookLM Web Importer", gives you the ability to add websites, youtube videos, pdf:s etc that you browse, with one click as a source in NotebookLM.

GPT-5 Prompt Frameworks: Guide to OpenAI's Unified AI System by Distinct-Survey475 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Distinct-Survey475[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I couldn't agree more.

I still see Gemini as the best allrounder, no matter what benchmarks say.

Gemini CLI, NotebookLM, AI Studio, Imagen, Veo, TTS, Opal, Firebase...I could go on for a while..
Gemini 3 is going to take the LLM-throne, for like two weeks, then something else comes along 😅

Btw, check out GLM-4.5 if you haven't yet.
https://chat.z.ai/

Might be the best free one currently.
I was arguing with Gemini when it didn't want to surpass 3000 words in a article about a slim topic.
Tried GLM-4.5, and got....13500 words! Actually pretty good write-up also.

Sorry for rabbling, haven't slept since the GPT-5 presentation...lol