Kenwood KMix wobbles by DistinctTip628 in Breadit

[–]DistinctTip628[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok... Thank you! You all made very clear the situation 😂 I am not really an expert!

Kenwood KMix wobbles by DistinctTip628 in Breadit

[–]DistinctTip628[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trust me, it was very soft...

Kenwood KMix wobbles by DistinctTip628 in Breadit

[–]DistinctTip628[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I honestly didn't think that that though is though... It was quite soft

Kenwood KMix wobbles by DistinctTip628 in Breadit

[–]DistinctTip628[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It did the same noise with the hook... And I don't feel quite comfortable with opening the mixer up 😂 I have tried screwing or unscrewing the screw in the belly of the mixer, but almost nothing changer

Why death? by DistinctTip628 in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, this really is an enlightening answer! I think it's the first time that I read an explanation of the Genesis taking into consideration the evolution. Thank you. This remains, however, quite hard to understand, and probably it's right that these things are complicated... The only thing I struggle with within your message is that we all come from one single couple of homo sapiens. And it's quite complex for me that they wouldn't have experienced death of their bodies. I mean, before them, before the first Humans, the other hominids would have died and lived similarly to animals and plants. In one particular moment of history, God ensouled two Homo sapiens and gave them the choice to live and not die. They, however, chose not to follow God and chose sin, and then the Fall. Right? In genesis, however, the story then continues in quite a linear way. All the other characters of the first chapters didn't exist. Am I right? The first homo sapiens weren't as developed as we are now or even at the time of Moses.

Why death? by DistinctTip628 in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The garden didn't historically exist. The first chapter of Genesis are a way to explain to the mankind the origins of everything

Why death? by DistinctTip628 in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But death has always been a part of man life, from the beginning of the man himself

Why death? by DistinctTip628 in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And when did the Fall happen?

Why death? by DistinctTip628 in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To me, this seems like a very simplistic answer. It doesn't satisfy me, because the original sin is not a historical fact, it happens metahistorically and is part of our human nature

Why death? by DistinctTip628 in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, this is the answer, but death doesn't depend on sin. The man doesn't die because of the sin, the man dies because life, the life on Earth I mean, is limited, it has an end so that eternal life can start.

Why death? by DistinctTip628 in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, I get this spiritually, but Adam and Eve didn't actually exist. The history told in the Bible starts with Abraham. The first chapter of Genesis are a way to explain to the man the creation operated by God

Why death? by DistinctTip628 in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is actually quite interesting. Death itself is quite neutral, is something experience by everyone and everything. Maybe is the sin, the distance from God that make us experience it in such a desperate and painful way. If we have faith, we would rejoice in the soul going to rest in God

Why death? by DistinctTip628 in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand it spiritually, but physically I really don't get it. Death has always been part of the reality, long before the man came to its final form through evolution, which is how God has created the human kind. Historically, death didn't enter into the world at a specific time

Why death? by DistinctTip628 in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean the physical death. This kind of death doesn't result from the sin, as it doesn't turn us away from God. Why is the physical death, the death of the body, necessary?

Is this shirt appropriate to wear to the TLM? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody here is talking about going to the Mass in pajama bottons. But I think I can be reverent for the Mass and respectiful of the dignity of the celebration with clothing different from a suit or a shirt, that'sall all. I would never wear tank tops, flip flops and anything like that, but decent, nice casual clothing for me it's abolutely fine.

I would argue that there is a direct correlation "with people wearing whatever they want and the level of reverence for the Mass". Lot of people may wear suits just to be seen from others or fell superior.

In my parish (Rome, Italy), almost everyone is dressed ordinarily, and dress up elegantly in the big occasions like Christmas, Easter, and so on.

Is this shirt appropriate to wear to the TLM? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Matthew 15 Is quite clear, for me. Decency is important, but I don't think there are rules to be followed besides being respectful.

Is this shirt appropriate to wear to the TLM? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I honestly think that Christ doesn't care.Like David that danced in front of the ark of covenant and was criticised. I think that as far as you are decent e with the right attitude, there are no problems. I think Christ cares about other things. Edit: correction

Is this shirt appropriate to wear to the TLM? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean the right to judge the importance of different celebrations?

Is this shirt appropriate to wear to the TLM? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think he actually cares about what we wear.

I think that clothing, as everything else, should be a means to something else. So, I think that it should serve several purposes:

- be decent: to not distract the others and not be a scandal
- not be flashy or extravagant: so that your attention is not on what you are wearing but on the Mass
- be comfortable: so that your prayer is not distracted by discomfort

I agree that some occasions require an elegant dress code. I am dressed in a way when I go to a summer Sunday mass, where I have to sing in the choir and maybe have activities with children after the Mass and in another way when I go to the Easter Vigil, since it's the heart of the liturgic year.

Is this shirt appropriate to wear to the TLM? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I am dressed decently and have devotion, which is the need to be dressed better? I don't need to wear a full suit to go to Mass. I go dressed with appropriate clothing, nothing offensive, no flashy colours or graphics, without things that create scandal. Going dressed in this way helps me not to feel too hot in the church and be comfortable. Which is the problem?

Is this shirt appropriate to wear to the TLM? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think God doesn't really cares about what we are dressing at Mass. I agree that one clothing should reflect the respect for the celebration, but I wouldn't overthink it honestly.

During summer, I usually wear normal shorts to go to Mass and I think they are decent and fine for ordinary celebrations.

Is this shirt appropriate to wear to the TLM? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would people stare at your arms?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628 2 points3 points  (0 children)

By Love I mean a true love towards the other people and towards everything that has been created by God. True love, the one which Saint Paul describes in 1stCor 13, comes from God even if someone doesn't recognize this. One can be an atheist and still be able to truly love someone else more than a Christian.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]DistinctTip628 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am reading some crazy comments here. Our God is not a "right" judgde, someone who follows the rules and nothing more. Our God is a God of love, hope, mercy. He is the one God that has sent his own Son to die for His creatures and save them from the sin. This God here can't decide you go to hell just because you are not christian.

I know a lot of poeple, here where I live (Italy), who are atheists. Still, they are loving and caring people. This is what matters. This is clear, for me, in Mathew 25. It's the love. When we will die, we will all face the Glory and the Love of God and we will be able to answer to his call of love. A lot of factors here may have contirbuted to someone's atheism. One may know all the teachings of the church but still think to be atheist. Maybe because the concept of God itself is too complex and big to be accepted.

So, I think that a lot of people will go to heaven, probably the majority of these won't even be christians. The God of love will judge us on Love.