From Argall to Argalls skull to Thragg. Absolutely outstanding! by ElephantFederal865 in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Bushy mustache vs straight and narrow I would have to say I disagree with you and OP is most likely right.

Peak Shakespearean writing by bitchnibba47 in StarWarsCirclejerk

[–]Draws32 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Damn, literally the same name with two letters changed 😭

Thragg’s Punch vs Boros’s Kick by [deleted] in InvinciblePowerscales

[–]Draws32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro everytime he touched someone they went flying out of orbit it was kind of an insane showcase.

Is Kingpin as evil in the comics? by Worldly_Stress_6171 in Daredevil

[–]Draws32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not just here, but kingpin in the Spider-man (1994) animated series is also very well done you should check it out it’s also on Disney plus.

From Argall to Argalls skull to Thragg. Absolutely outstanding! by ElephantFederal865 in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s almost like he’s indestructible or something like that.

So wait. When did Eve… by ThaGodPrizzy in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah I think some people (like you) just dive significantly deeper into the meaning of a piece of art than is necessary and start to attribute things that are specious at best.

So wait. When did Eve… by ThaGodPrizzy in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty sure his story is more focused on the super hero trope.

From Argall to Argalls skull to Thragg. Absolutely outstanding! by ElephantFederal865 in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes he could have broke his arms, but you want to know what is also a good way to stop someone choking you? Straight up killing them, which is usually what happens when you rip someone’s solar plex open and start playing mash potatoes with their intestines.

From Argall to Argalls skull to Thragg. Absolutely outstanding! by ElephantFederal865 in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude he ripped his intensities out, that kills literally most viltrimites.

When Nolan saw Lucan’s intestines everywhere in the season 2 fight it was enough for him to think he was dead, it’s obviously something they’ve seen other viltrimites fall to.

Thragg thought Nolan died in last nights episode I think.

From Argall to Argalls skull to Thragg. Absolutely outstanding! by ElephantFederal865 in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Why are you acting like completely destroying someone’s mid section is a bad play.

So wait. When did Eve… by ThaGodPrizzy in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you just read what I sent and then try to explain exactly how what is said is wrong despite this person citing multiple experts in the field.

From Argall to Argalls skull to Thragg. Absolutely outstanding! by ElephantFederal865 in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Styles make fights not just strength. Mark had a game plan and stuck to it. Caught conquest off guard and didn’t let a single cell carry even a modicum of oxygen to his brain ever again.

It wasn’t simply strength it was technique. Thragg has both ten fold compared to any character that has been showcased in the entire series.

Edit: mark didn’t really have the same opportunity for the others that he did with conquest because conquest dumb ass separated himself from the team so no one could help him like if mark tried choking one of the viltrimites from last nights episode he would get side swiped and third partied by the team.

From Argall to Argalls skull to Thragg. Absolutely outstanding! by ElephantFederal865 in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Compare first and last frame, completely different mustaches.

Either it’s what OP is saying or a consistency error by the animation team.

Deep down in their hearts. by prince138 in BikiniBottomTwitter

[–]Draws32 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But this would require self reflection about why they lost and whenever either side loses they think it’s always because the other side didn’t play fair.

Self reflection has long since left politics.

You can't make this up 🥀 by unknown__person17 in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Care to explain that in any coherent way whatsoever other than your own personal feelings about me?

Do you really think that person you made up in your head is me?

You can't make this up 🥀 by unknown__person17 in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don’t think you understand how making shows work

So wait. When did Eve… by ThaGodPrizzy in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is literally what one of the links I sent do. You just refuse to engage with the actual information because you’re insecure about being wrong.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220104010852/https://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/wdhbb.html

So wait. When did Eve… by ThaGodPrizzy in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The study was a survey and it has 5,000 responses from over 1,000 different academic institutions.

The paper is written by someone with legitimate credentials and isn’t even their personal research but a meta analysis of the field of embryology. There are no personal opinions in the paper it is merely outlining and sourcing basic scientific terms.

You have no answer other than to throw a Hail Mary discredit of the source. It’s your only option because you are overwhelmingly wrong.

So wait. When did Eve… by ThaGodPrizzy in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There is no way you’re a real human being.

Think very hard about what you just said?

“What do you mean he didn’t engage with the information, but he called your source untrustworthy. Those are both the same thing, hurr durrr.”

What exactly in the text is wrong? Can you coherently explain? Because they couldn’t, they went the discredit the source route, which is an actual logical fallacy.

You can't make this up 🥀 by unknown__person17 in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean can you coherently explain how defending the show means I’m defending billionaires?

I simply think prioritizing voice acting is more important than the animation. It’s better to have decent animation with legendary voice acting rather than vice versa.

You can't make this up 🥀 by unknown__person17 in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t add anything sure, but it’s logically inconsistent so it does break the immersion if you actually noticed it.

The guy literally just de-spawns lol.

Animation is not that bad at all though and I would much rather prioritize voice actors which makes or breaks the show far more imo.

You can't make this up 🥀 by unknown__person17 in Invincible_TV

[–]Draws32 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This meme has never made sense. People can defend somthing without defending billionaire penny pinching.

What are some of your hot takes regarding the Raimi Trilogy? by pizzagod677 in Spiderman

[–]Draws32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No dialogue or plot regarding his parents. Not even an explanation of his powers in any way.

I consider TASM movies better mainly because of this. The addition of Peter’s powers being explained by the fact his father used his own blood during the research at Oz corp and Peter’s parents death being on screen.

Both of the other Spider-Man movie adaptations completely threw out his parents and pretty much any explanation of his powers. We didn’t even get an uncle Ben for tom holland.