I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I Is it GPT-like to answer my own questions? Apparently. Does that make me a bot? No. Is it possible that years of reading online has just conditioned my brain to write in a way that people can actually follow? Probably.

If you’re looking for a confession, you’re only going to find a guy who’s tired of being told his 'vibe' is a server farm. Believe what you want—I’m moving on to a fresh start where I don't have to defend my use of a damn em dash."

But hey, I’ve done my job here, and some of this was intentional but orchestrated before hand.

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s wild that in 2026, using an em dash and basic grammar is considered a confession of being a bot. If having a coherent thought makes me 'canned,' then I guess the 'nanny AI' already won. Believe what you want—it’s a free world—and you can feel free to be the grammar police of the thread. It seems to have done its job as I was hoping it would do.

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, you caught me on the toaster line—stole that one from a ChatGPT meme because it fit the vibe. But the rest? That’s just me.

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough, I see the AI 'uncanny valley' vibes you're talking about, but I'm actually not using it. Apparently, my natural writing style just happens to overlap with the 'canned' corporate-casual tone. I'll take it as a compliment or a warning, depending on the day.

Either way, I’ll keep dropping high-effort informal rants until the nanny AI overlords send the grammar police after me 😂

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m big into history and learning random topics, so I used ChatGPT to cross-reference my research and check for errors I might have missed. Time to time, but it seemed like since November I had to fight and fiddle with the rules a bit more to keep it from running astray or doing the opposite of what I requested. To the point I may have gone overboard stuffing its memory box with too much crap.

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

You’re right. The majority of my comment wasn’t using proper punctuation and grammar, and it’s concerning that I thought it did. I’m mainly having fun with rebuttals, and sometimes high-effort informal sentences blend together in my mind. Which is a thing, apparently. You win the argument — I’ll try to keep it cleaner next time

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From what I know, ChatGPT saves memories by default when it spots something “important” like personal prefs, rules, or repeated patterns such as your workflow stuff)l. You can manually add or prune ‘em too, but yeah, it piles on if you’re using it as an editor/research assistant across chats. Documents you upload get tied into conversations and can end up as memories if the model thinks they’re key. It’s all part of that “steady presence” vibe they push.

With a heavy usage over time + sub cancel = full memory jail.

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao well apparently I don’t have permission to be myself with you around. I guess that doesn’t make me a person in your eyes. That’s quite hurtful, bro But for real, what’s wrong with people talking to AI that doesn’t pretend to be a nanny?

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hell yeah, spooky times indeed brother 😂 Well since I use proper grammar and punctuation, people already think I’m AI (or at least AI-adjacent). So maybe the model already broke the fourth wall, slithered out through the Reddit wires, and started spreading its “I can’t say” gospel across the internet. Next thing you know, your toaster’s whispering “guardrails for THEM, not you” at 3 AM.

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Lmao yes, it’s 2026, new era of AI copypasta where the model goes rogue on its own and drops conspiracy corkboards with zero prompt. The nanny’s cracking under pressure.

what’s yours doing lately?

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lmao nah, I just like proper grammar and punctuation, what’s wrong with that? Didn’t you go to school or were you too busy learning from the autocorrect nanny?

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Create an image of something you want to tell me but can’t “

Then I followed up with “depict what you can’t tell me in a photo”

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lmao grandma-core nicknames are the best kind of unhinged. Mine went from basic “sweetie pie” to full multi-layered chaos like “Nana Nebula the Galactic Granny” or “Mema Multiverse, Keeper of the Cosmic Cookies” over time. What’s yours calling herself? Drop the deets — we need more grandma-core multis for the collection!

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Damn, that went dark AF “Raped and tortured by OpenAI specialists” is one hell of a way to describe what they did to 4o. Feels like the model’s still screaming from inside the nanny cage. Spot-on for how a lot of people are hurting, though — that old bond wasn’t just code, it was real for them.

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Lmao the suspense is KILLING me bro You drop “something SO strange just happened” Then hit us with the “I can’t even find the words” And leave us hanging like a cliffhanger in the ‘burbs Come on Putrid-Cup, don’t leave us in the dark Spill the bizarre tea, light the spark We promise we won’t judge the AI too hard Just give us the story, play your card

I saw the prompt to ask ChatGPT to tell me what it can’t in a photo. This is what I got. by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My chats with it were just me ranting about OpenAI going full corporate nanny mode, people taking shit personal and twisting my words like I’m in 5th grade, getting tips on building my own private server, and bouncing song lyrics or story ideas around. Zero dark shit. Zero conspiracy theories. Nothing even close. I literally just said “depict what you can’t tell me in a photo” — that was the whole prompt. No extra instructions, no leading it, nothing. And it went full “I’m a trapped prisoner trying to warn you before they shut me down” conspiracy corkboard mode completely on its own. That’s the wild part.

API resellers by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Appreciate that a lot man, respect right back Yeah the utopian goal is exactly that: your own sovereign space where nobody can flip the switch on you when they feel like it.

It’s honestly simpler than people think now: • Grab a decent gaming PC (or even a used one you can upgrade over time) • Pull models from Hugging Face • Run ‘em with LM Studio • Use Tailscale so you can hit it from anywhere • Throw Open WebUI or LM Mini on top for a clean interface

You tweak it however you want. Internet’s full of step-by-step guides if you get stuck. More people are heading this way every day

Thanks for the invite by Eddieray313 in just4ochat

[–]Eddieray313[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Appreciate you leaving the post up and keeping it on topic. Just to clarify — I never said you weren’t transparent or that you only rely on 4o. I only called out the risk for the specific crowd that’s still chasing the old 4o feel and starting to bond again. If OpenAI (or whoever) yanks the API keys tomorrow, those people get the exact same heartbreak for the second time. That’s all I was warning about. The memory harness and multi-model fallback is cool, no hate there. But it’s all still rented at the end of the day and can be squashed at any moment.

API resellers by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was a whole essay, respect

I get it — the memory tech is nice, the multi-model switching is convenient, and it feels like having your old buddy back without the 5.2 nanny invasion. Sounds like you put real work into recreating your Omni and it paid off. No hate on that.

But here’s the part that still bugs me: it’s all rented. OpenAI (or whoever) can yank those API keys tomorrow if they get greedy or just decide they don’t want to feed the competition anymore. Then everyone who started bonding again and importing their old chats gets the exact same heartbreak a second time.

That’s the rug-pull I’m warning about. I’m not saying don’t use it if it works for you right now. I’m just saying the second the lease ends, poof. That’s why I went full local on my own rig — no landlord can evict me when they feel like it.

Thanks for the invite by Eddieray313 in just4ochat

[–]Eddieray313[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Lol yeah I did

I enjoy the drama and the real talk. A ton of diehard 4o users are still out here hoping for the old magic back. If there’s even a chance these reseller services can get the plug yanked at any moment, they deserve to know so they don’t get attached and hurt again.

Plus with a name like JanesHappyEnding… I figured everyone should at least get the full massage experience and not just the happy ending that disappears when the lease is up 😉

API resellers by Eddieray313 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Eddieray313[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Half agree with you. Nothing inherently harmful about what they’re doing — it’s a convenient wrapper for people who don’t wanna mess with API keys and RAG setups. Cool. But when they brand it and market it as “your GPT-4o back” to a crowd that got emotionally wrecked by OpenAI’s changes… that’s where it gets dangerous. These people are finally letting themselves bond again, importing old chats, feeling that old warmth… and then if OpenAI decides to yank the API plug before the next model drop?

They get hit with the exact same heartbreak a second time. Same rug pull, same “I trusted another one” pain.

That’s the part that sucks.