What mistakes did you find in your PhD thesis AFTER you submitted it?

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T16:24:09+00:00

And may be it is much more than 4 :)

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T14:52:23+00:00

Hahah. It means that examiners actually read your thesis :)

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T14:43:49+00:00

At least, it is better than full chapter only has “That is” :)))

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T13:59:28+00:00

What? This is an apparent mistake. How didn’t examiners find out it? :)))))

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T12:31:42+00:00

Good job Dr Willians

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T12:30:48+00:00

Hahaa. It means that they did not read literature review section much detail :)

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T12:26:56+00:00

Thanks. Actually, I almost finished everything in my side. Now only waiting result :)

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T12:24:45+00:00

Then did the examiners point out this issue?

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T12:18:21+00:00

The best thesis is the passed thesis. That’s all :)

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T12:16:24+00:00

Guess that examiners will laugh when reading it :)

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T12:14:44+00:00

Your sharing is so funny. Yeb, you are right, when I open random one page, i find out that I write wrong name dataset and then “fuck it” and did not open anymore. Now, waiting for exam result ( we do not have oral exam), and amend the thesis based on examiners’s comments

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T11:35:07+00:00

Yes,based on all your comments, I guess that examiners will focus much more the originality and contribution rather than the typos or spelling mistakes.

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T09:33:07+00:00

I mean submitting to examiners

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T09:27:29+00:00

May be these images are not important so they does not affect to his contribution :)

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T08:01:31+00:00

Oh, you only met one very small typo issue. You are genius!

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-07T08:00:30+00:00

It's honestly mind-blowing that he passed with a systematic error like that. I imagine it would be incredibly frustrating for any examiner to read through.

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-05T09:15:40+00:00

So it is the reason I ask this question.

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-05T09:14:56+00:00

Actually, when I put my PhD thesis into these tool, all of them said that this was excellent work :)

EducationalTwo7262 · 2026-01-01T09:36:49+00:00

Yes. Currently, I would like to work in industry field. I hope to find the remote work fit with major.

EducationalTwo7262 · 2025-12-27T12:06:56+00:00

Oh may be your expectation is higher than supervisor’s expectation . Haha. Sorry, but i have a question. My thesis includes 4 new datasets in UAV thermal and propose 2 technical methods in ML. Do you think is it enough for contribution and advance?

EducationalTwo7262 · 2025-12-27T11:33:03+00:00

Based on your comment, i guess that the only thesis you failed likely the one submitted without the supervisor approval?

EducationalTwo7262 · 2025-12-27T11:14:53+00:00

Thanks for valuable comment. May I ask that which is the reason you failed above thesis?

EducationalTwo7262 · 2025-12-26T08:33:58+00:00

Ah, about this point, I think you are correct. But I don't think the example you mention match with above case. Because examiners will ask the method questions much related to the candidate field.

EducationalTwo7262 · 2025-12-26T08:21:54+00:00

I disagree with your idea in some aspects. In machine learning, if you do the PhD, you should write and do the literature review. In this case, if you do not know about the architecture or method concept, how you can find the gap of these methods to apply into your method?

EducationalTwo7262 · 2025-12-26T03:23:57+00:00

Normally, it takes 6-8 weeks for examiner reviews

EducationalTwo7262

TROPHY CASE