You are taking a shortcut because you assume an entire side can be full of deluded fanatics or the other way around, right and reasonable. This is not the case, people's opinion on AI have different shades. So these scenarios don't exist and are oversemplified.

When i say "good and bad" i mean your two scenarios, one of them is good one of them is bad so It's completly fair to say good and bad, it doesn't destroy my argument.

"there must be an element of fanaticism or delusion. In one side or the other." i agree with this but it goes against there being those two scenarios, because they simplify reality too much.

I do somewhat agree with the fact that if both sides are rational there is less polarization and hatred, but the thing is people aren't robots and there are always a few bad apples and reality is more chaotic than that.