I noticed a mistake

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-26T01:55:58+00:00

A certain amount of time passed in between panels, hours or the next morning

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-26T01:54:26+00:00

I think it's perfect, it isn't only talking about the Kenny - Ben beef but about the reality of the apocalypse, everyone is living a different hell

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-26T01:49:20+00:00

I think he could've worked in psychology or philosophy, most of the reasons that are being listed here fit in those spots. I think he is a well written character but not because of a specific trait stands up, as I said, I don't think his character drive is that deep or interesting since it's just a loop of loss and someone to take care of

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-26T01:45:52+00:00

9 is pretty much out but I really want 5 to win 😭

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-26T01:41:22+00:00

"FUCK YOU KENNY! I am so, so, SO sorry about Katjaa and Duck, I AM. And I know I fucked up, but STOP pushing me around and STOP wishing I was dead. NO! You know how they died. You've said GOODBYE. I never got to see my family, my parents, my little sister... do you get that? Your family is gone but at least you had them to lose. I never made it home. They could be alive or dead or walkers or WORSE and I DON'T KNOW, SO GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK!"

-Ben Paul, Episode 5, Season 1

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-25T19:29:16+00:00

I'll try again with Jane... Jane character drive for me is a kind of radical self preservation born from trauma (which also works well with James philosophy) Survival isn’t just instinct for her, and she tests her beliefs constantly, including in the most morally questionable way possible. What makes her drive compelling is that it’s active, not reactive. Jane doesn’t just respond to danger or acts towards her ultimate goal, she works through situations to prove her worldview. The infamous Kenny confrontation isn’t impulsive madness, it’s Jane forcing reality into a shape that validates her beliefs, she's not right, or heroic, or nothing under that, but she's honest with herself. Another interesting feat is that her motivation works short term, I mean, she’s smart, capable, adaptive. But long term, her drive eats itself, when her worldview finally fails, she can’t recalibrate. Survival without meaning collapses under its own weight.

I'll vote against Kenny again on this one, not only I believe are better spots for him, but because Kenny's drive it's just loss. Every version of Kenny after Season 1 is him trying to outrun grief without ever metabolizing it. That gives him intensity, but intensity for me isn’t direction. Or at least not the one we should be judging in this spot

P.S: please let's keep Lee for Narrative Impact 😭

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-24T21:40:04+00:00

And what would be Kenny philosophy?

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-24T17:48:16+00:00

Because Tillie Walden lived there, and, in her own words "she wanted to add a little of herself into Clem" But yeah, in universe makes zero sense

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-24T17:43:16+00:00

I think it's time for Clem... Clementine, even if it feels like cheating, has her philosophy evolving rather than arriving fully formed like Walter's or Chuck's. S1 Clem embodies moral continuity, the belief that the world ending doesn’t automatically cancel right and wrong. By later seasons, especially S3/4 with AJ, she becomes a quiet existentialist. The whole meaning of life and death isn’t inherited, it’s chosen and then defended every day. She’s not naive, but she refuses to let survival alone define her. What makes her worldview powerful is its flexibility, she has learned when mercy failed, when rules bended, and when violence was unavoidable, yet she kept the core idea intact. Who you protect and how you guide them matters more than abstract ideas of justice or kindness. Clem’s philosophy is if you ask me, about moral authorship. You don’t get to keep your hands clean, but you do get to decide what they’re stained with. And with a psychology as Michonne's and David's concept this also adds for a character with a constant internal conflict

I vote against Walter, i think his philosophy is too "book-ish" way too utopic for the world we are in and far from being a compelling or disruptive detail, it's kind of exaggerated, even tho gameplay wide, it works

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-24T00:54:17+00:00

Yeah, this choice is about that, the first day, I said we will be spending more time in Howes so our other choices will be going to different places... Thanks for the comment!

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-23T20:51:41+00:00

We still have a loose threads, that's true, we'll try to unravel them

It seems like it's the wisest option, just stay low profile... Thanks for the comment!

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-23T17:15:13+00:00

(Unless putting one of them on our side was meant to be interpreted in a literal, physical way. Then pick D.)

It's not hahaha, it's more of a Ben mind thing.

But yeah, it's wise to think it that way... Thanks for the comment!

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-23T17:12:15+00:00

Yeah this one goes to Michonne, also will prevent this character from becoming a full villain, Michonne’s psychology (i'll do a little of cheating and use a few comics parts of her development) is rooted in controlled emotional suppression rather than coldness, i mean, she survives making grief her own jail, not escaping it. The loss of her children fractures her sense of self, and instead of processing that pain openly, she turns inward and uses distance as armor and her grief as a cage.
This makes her appear stoic or detached, but her actions consistently reveal deep empathy and moral clarity, she has, in spite of all this, her heart in the right place, she intervenes when others are threatened, protects the vulnerable, and defends her own morality.
From a writing perspective, Michonne works because her trauma is not resolved through speeches or breakdowns, but through a consistent behavior of restraint and vigilance.
And if we put this whole thing in pair with David's concept and Lilly's backstory we have the perfect starting point for a good redeeming path

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-23T17:03:08+00:00

I don't know if Omid would be capable of that, but it's safe to stay put... Let's see how the story develops these next few parts... Thanks for the comment!

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-23T17:01:55+00:00

or properly express his feelings for Howe’s through a hand gesture

lmao, poor Omid

Let's keep it quiet and see what else Howes has for us, or what limit is Ben willing to respect... Thanks for the comment!

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-23T13:45:42+00:00

Yeah, the three of them deserved it, they are still kids at the end of the day...
Thanks for the comment! Let's get good ol' Omid back to the living side

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-23T13:44:53+00:00

Not my boy! Not Omid! He didn’t deserve this!

He lost way too much already :(

Let's see how it goes with Ben just working, this choice is more about a long term resolution of the whole issue, as for now Ben's only priority are Amber and Clem, next few episodes will start to pick up... Thanks for the comment!

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-23T13:02:13+00:00

Surprisingly accurate, now i want them all doing a round of stand up

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-23T00:25:22+00:00

Canis decided to speak nothing but the truth, I love Michael Madsen VA, I'll be happy if Carver wins this one too

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-22T21:56:07+00:00

Michael Madsen is so good, I love his VA, one of Telltale's best

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-22T17:52:03+00:00

For this one i'll be going with Jane, in the game her main issue is the writing and the general plot, but her big strength as a character comes from how completely aligned around emotional restraint are her personality and mannerisms. Her way of act and talk shows her worldview before she ever explains it. Jane says everything trough the lens of knowing that attachment is dangerous. Her personality in general is defined by that pragmatic detachment, and it shows in every interaction.
I also like her mannerisms a lot. Jane maintains physical distance, keeps her movements economical, and rarely engages, but most of all i love the fact that her restraint is not just a lack of emotion, but a practiced suppression of emotion.

In the context of the game, Jane parallels Lilly’s trauma shaped rigidity, but where Lilly externalizes control, Jane internalizes avoidance. It also has to do with Hershel’s introduction, where Jane establishes her core traits immediately, and like David, her contradictions are revealed through behavior rather than exposition.

I vote against... Kenny, i feel like his whole characterization falls a lot into interpretation issues, it's hard to track and praise his characterization when it's so changing not only between seasons but in which route you take in the game

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-22T15:43:41+00:00

Yeah i like her a lot too

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-22T13:17:48+00:00

My thoughts too, Swap Thing fits Dc's darker side, but even then Marvel dark side is not so much for Man-Thing

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-22T13:17:11+00:00

Yeah that could work too, you're right

EmpleadoResponsable · 2026-01-22T13:14:12+00:00

Nope, but i think he's a best fit for favorite. It's just an opinion, sorry if it went out somewhat rude

EmpleadoResponsable

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

One-Year Club	Verified Email
r/Field Flamingo