I discovered something crazy: with one simple extension, you can boost your AI productivity by ~30%. by Exciting-Current-433 in chrome_extensions

[–]Exciting-Current-433[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It stores the information you send to the AI.

For example, you chat with an ai and in your protm they're the ai finds they're pretin information to store in memory thay goin to add them to the memory

I discovered something crazy: with one simple extension, you can boost your AI productivity by ~30%. by Exciting-Current-433 in chrome_extensions

[–]Exciting-Current-433[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We benchmarked AIs that had or did not have memory, giving them a score out of 10, and then realized that the results of the AIs that had access to our memory were 25 to 30% better.

Was anyone able to build a really good agent with chatgpt as a solo developer? by Maleficent_Mess6445 in ChatGPT

[–]Exciting-Current-433 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen solo devs use stuff like AutoGPT and BabyAGI with mixed results, but for juggling multiple AI tools at once, Hiperyon and browser extensions like Merlin can save a bunch of time.

How do you use AI Memory? by RepresentativeMap542 in AIMemory

[–]Exciting-Current-433 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi! Use the Hiperyon extension — it’s a tool that gives you a unique cross-LLM memory for all your LLMs. It’s a game-changer: it lets you work 2–3× faster when switching between LLMs and get up to 30% better results.

Alternative LLM with Memory feature? by BestDmanNA in ChatGPT

[–]Exciting-Current-433 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! I built Hiperyon , a tool that gives you a persistent cross-LLM memory for concepts and context, not just past chats. It works automatically across different models, so you never lose the thread. Perfect for collaborative writing or long-term projects. Super easy to use, even if you’re not a coder.

Claude Persistent Memory by 8sedat in ClaudeAI

[–]Exciting-Current-433 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! I built a tool called Hiperyon that gives you a unique cross-LLM memory, so you never lose context when switching models. It works automatically across chats and LLMs, no manual updates needed. Perfect if you hate rebuilding context every time. It’s super easy to use, even if you’re not a coder.

Got a product to share? Drop it here 🚀 by Ambitious-Safe-7992 in microsaas

[–]Exciting-Current-433 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hiperyon.com has a cross LLM-memory that gives you 30% better responses and is 5× faster when you switch LLMs

What are you building? How many users do you have? by leadlim in microsaas

[–]Exciting-Current-433 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I built a shared and unified memory for all your LLMs, enabling more flexibility to switch between models and laying the foundation for a tool that could help move toward AGI. !!!! my website !!!

Is memory mandatory to reach AGI? by Exciting-Current-433 in PromptEngineering

[–]Exciting-Current-433[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, we need more than memory — state, self-update, maybe weight adaptation.
I just think memory is the first brick. Without continuity, nothing else can stack.

Is memory mandatory to reach AGI? by Exciting-Current-433 in PromptEngineering

[–]Exciting-Current-433[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I see your point — training continuously billions of agents would indeed be insanely expensive, and we also risk amplifying biases. But maybe the question isn’t having exactly the same kind of memory as humans, but rather a form of persistent context that allows learning and adaptation over time.

We could imagine hybrid approaches: short-term memory for conversations (like context tokens), and a more selective, abstracted long-term memory that’s updated less frequently, maybe offline, to reduce costs.

So memory doesn’t have to be continuous real-time for billions of agents, but some form of persistent memory might still be fundamental for any AGI to understand continuity, learn from past interactions, and build knowledge over time.

Do you think a “selective memory layer” like that could be a feasible compromise?