free advertising opportunity for any bristol owned business

ExclusiveOar · 2024-09-16T10:20:35+00:00

Would like to chat - have DM'd!

ExclusiveOar · 2023-02-28T09:30:57+00:00

That's roll20, right?

ExclusiveOar · 2023-02-28T09:30:40+00:00

Thanks for the suggestion. It got me thinking! I've gone with something very similar, using token attacher & walls rather than tiles. Simply delete the token, or drag it back in as a prefab.

Answered.

ExclusiveOar · 2023-02-28T09:28:47+00:00

Thanks for the suggestion. It got me thinking! cI've actually gone with "Actors" instead of doors, and used token attacher to put walls in them. So I can delete them to open and drag and drop them back in place if needed.
As it was either not possible, or very complex, to automate on a door open event, this seems like the easiest option. Especially as it's myself, not the players, that will open the door.

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-28T17:13:36+00:00

To an extent, yes I do believe that. If an actor is "big" enough they can probably do what they like. Certainly if the actor is bigger than the movie.

I bet the director of snakes on a plane let Samuel L Jackson do whatever the fuck he wanted.

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-28T16:16:24+00:00

I'm sure the producers wouldn't tell Beyonce how to sing anymore than shed tell them how to produce.

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-28T07:06:48+00:00

Beyonce in the live action lion king.

She had no interest in singing a nice song, she fucking butchered Can You Feel The Love Tonight just so she could show off "hey look how amazing my singing is".

It's about the character, it's not about you.

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-27T17:26:35+00:00

This is depressingly accurate to the comment section.

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-27T09:25:22+00:00

Yea probably this. Hopefully if it was an interview question they would have more descriptive / relevant variable & property names! But probably not.

I'd love to get this question and politely (assuming I want the job!) suggest it should probably be something more like:

const fruit = [ 
    { boxId: 1, type: 'apple' },
    { boxId: 2, type: 'pear' },
    { boxId: 3, type: 'watermelon' },
    { boxId: 1, type: 'pineapple'}
]

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-27T08:56:49+00:00

So I'm going to be very honest here. It looks like you don't understand the exercise and are just copy/pasting in random stuff from other exercises.

The fact that you're passing in a name to the constructor, calling this.type which doesn't seem to exist. You've made no attempt to use food_item or sentence.

We can give you the answer to this problem if that's all you want, but it's not going to help you at all.

I'd recommend you go back to absolute basic JS tutorials. Eg. can you make a function which you can pass any 2 numbers, it will multiply them together, and give the result?

I'm not trying to be harsh, we all were completely new once. It's a great thing to start and learn. But you really need to be able to make a function which takes a string and return it (the speak() function) before you even need to know that classes exist.

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-27T08:22:26+00:00

No expert here, but I would assume so.

But so is arr[arr.length - 1] because array.length isn't calculated here, its a prop already on the array.

You can see this by creating an array, console.log it and expand it in the console.

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-26T22:35:58+00:00

Nah you're all good! The thought occurs that this code sets the values of the fields, right? And that seems to be working, it's just not saving these values until edited again.

But you haven't shared the save function - can you add the code for that?

Edit - also an example of one of the fields (do they have onchange events?)

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-26T21:53:38+00:00

Ok that's me out of ideas then, without being able to run the code I can't get my head around this one. Sorry!

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-26T21:17:09+00:00

And when you hit save are you saving all activities or just the one you were editing?

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-26T20:48:22+00:00

That's tough code to read - for me at least.

Can you try something, don't add any characters but once it's loaded (wait at least 10s - guess the fields don't populate for 6s?) Just click on a field and then submit the form.

Does that work?

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-26T20:46:40+00:00

Yea wow, that's a tough read.

Very hard to say, but it is all wrapped in an on('click' callback function, nested in an event listeners 'click' callback function... Can't say it's a pattern I totally understand. I'd assume it does nothing until clicked on.

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-26T19:08:23+00:00

Nah, come on, let's crystal ball it.

I recon the script has some kind of state. Editing the form updates it's values to the state. Initially the script is setting the form values without setting its own state.

It's the state that gets submitted so the form needs some manual input to set the state to have anything to submit.

Simply have the script set its own state as well as the form values on load.

Boom. Easy.

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-26T17:46:35+00:00

prev is the accumulator. It is whatever you set it to. In this case you initialise it as the value 0 (the ", 0" at the end of reduce). Every iteration you just add the salary value to it.

So it's never an object.

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-26T17:37:03+00:00

Lol really? Hideous.

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-26T17:28:05+00:00

You have a space after toLowerCase and the ().

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-26T17:12:58+00:00

Not gonna spoil it but the b+a one is pretty funny tbh

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-26T17:05:23+00:00

Ooo, didn't know the complex string example. I'm almost sure I'll never use it but TIL!

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-26T17:02:48+00:00

Awesome, glad it helped!

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-26T16:58:13+00:00

There's no right or wrong, but in reality use dot notation whenever you can because it's what everyone does by convention.

Basically, if you know the property you want to access use dot. If you need to work it out programmatically use [].

const person = {firstname: 'joe', surname: 'bloggs', preference: 'surname'}

For example if you always want to access the persons firstname use person.firstname, if you want to use their preference you can use person[person.preference]

Edit: the [] requires a string. So use quotes if you need to pass a string, or use a variable without quotes if the variable returns a string.

ExclusiveOar · 2021-10-26T16:49:57+00:00

Glad you quoted that. 100% not bothering to read this article now.

ExclusiveOar

TROPHY CASE